Quoting: arafay
I think chisholm is definitely a good prospect coming back. That said, what else would you want? He’s not exactly on an appealing contract long term, even though he’s worth it now. Asking for Heinola probably breaks the deal as well. So I’m not sure.
Parayko to a divisional rival makes sense. But if the price is right, I’d imagine they would do it regardless. I’m not saying this is enough, cause idk what is. That’ll depend on what the market and blues decide is enough.
I don’t think they move him to be honest with you. I don’t think we can. He’s not the high end #1D we thought he would be initially. But it’s hard not to overlook the fact that he’s been thrown into the hardest usage by far for the team with the lack of a competent partner. Mikkola was god awful with the puck and is a serviceable defender as a bottom pair PKer. Leddy is an ok 3 zone player who’s strength is transitioning the puck mostly with his legs versus his passing. Parayko has around 65% dzone starts and has been used as a shutdown defender, but is being asked to be the number 1 guy.
He’s not perfect by any means. Isn’t a great first passer. Pretty good skater, and isn’t all that physical. But he’s far and away the best the Blues have, and we’re extremely far from having anyone else be able to handle the minutes he gets.
I wasn’t meant to slight the prospects involved. But taking more dart throws when we have as many picks and a couple of top end forward prospects doesn’t make a lot of sense. As much as most of us want to solidly a few top picks in the next couple of drafts, there’s nobody that will be in this FA class to at least shelter the current group we have to ensure we don’t turn into a 5-10 year train wreck.
I’ve went back and forth on this, but without a pretty sure fire right handed defensemen near term coming back it doesn’t make sense to move him. Faulk/Krug/Leddy are vastly different conversations to have though.