Joined: Dec. 2022
Posts: 2,677
Likes: 1,370
I discussed this with you in the last thread. But you can’t possibly rationalize that this is appealing at all to the Blues. We’re adding more salary for next season to have a gaping hole on RD one of the hardest positions to fill for the foreseeable future. To take on Garland who probably has a net zero value, assuming a team isn’t planning on competing during the length of his contract.
You’re asking us to get much much worse for multiple years for a 3rd (let’s say pick 80 in 24) and giving us no real hope or plan of competing in 3-5 seasons. It’s not realistic, nor appetizing at all for the Blues.