SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Since Sharks Fans Have an Apparent Interest

Created by: Shakabakes
Team: 2023-24 New York Rangers
Initial Creation Date: May 11, 2023
Published: May 11, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$2,250,000
5$5,200,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$1,100,000
1$900,000
Trades
NYR
  1. Barabanov, Alexander
Additional Details:
Rangers get Cap Space for this year and beyond.
SJS
  1. Goodrow, Barclay
Additional Details:
Sharks reunite with a well liked Veteran Forward who's not on an expiring Contract.
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2023
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the COL
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the WPG
2024
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
2025
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$83,500,000$83,297,082$610,892$965,000$202,918
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the New York Rangers
$6,500,000$6,500,000
LW
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the New York Rangers
$8,500,000$8,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the New York Rangers
$2,250,000$2,250,000
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the New York Rangers
$11,642,857$11,642,857
LW
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the New York Rangers
$5,625,000$5,625,000
C, RW
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the New York Rangers
$2,100,000$2,100,000
RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$450,000$450K)
LW
RFA - 3
Logo of the New York Rangers
$4,437,500$4,437,500
C, LW
UFA - 4
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$828,333$828,333 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
LW
RFA - 2
$900,000$900,000
C, LW
UFA
Logo of the New York Rangers
$800,000$800,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the New York Rangers
$762,500$762,500
C
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the New York Rangers
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$9,500,000$9,500,000
RD
UFA - 6
Logo of the New York Rangers
$5,666,667$5,666,667
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the New York Rangers
$5,200,000$5,200,000
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the New York Rangers
$8,000,000$8,000,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the New York Rangers
$1,100,000$1,100,000
G
UFA
Logo of the New York Rangers
$797,500$797,500 (Performance Bonus$32,500$32K)
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$400,000$400K)
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$787,500$787,500
LD
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
May 11, 2023 at 11:32 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2023
Posts: 2,341
Likes: 976
Probably need a mid round draft pick going to SJ. Maybe a 3rd if they are happy to get rid of Barbanov and taking the cap hit of Goodrow.
May 11, 2023 at 11:33 a.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 1,363
Likes: 621
Rangers add at least a mid round puck
May 11, 2023 at 11:34 a.m.
#3
1GarthSnowFan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2021
Posts: 11,744
Likes: 4,803
Barbanov has significant trade value, while Goodrow is a severely overpaid fourth line winger/center. I’m not saying this to hate on the rangers, but a fourth line “center” who can’t win face offs is just not going to have positive value. Like ever.
May 11, 2023 at 11:54 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 8,550
Likes: 3,870
Literally zero sharks fans have this interest. ZERO. Why take on that much more cap for a less productive overpaid 4C?
palhal liked this.
May 11, 2023 at 12:23 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2019
Posts: 3,005
Likes: 879
Quoting: glarson17
Literally zero sharks fans have this interest. ZERO. Why take on that much more cap for a less productive overpaid 4C?


6 of the last 8 posts created by Sharks fans that involved the Rangers had Goodrow included in them. Hence, why I felt there was genuine interest.
May 11, 2023 at 12:24 p.m.
#6
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 60,924
Likes: 23,463
Quoting: glarson17
Literally zero sharks fans have this interest. ZERO. Why take on that much more cap for a less productive overpaid 4C?


Why? Because Ranger fans have no respect for other teams cap, or Goodrow's M NTC, and in this case other team player's value.
May 11, 2023 at 12:34 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 11,669
Likes: 4,901
Barabanov is a top 6 player for us (likely a middle 6 for a playoff team) and Goodrow is a bottom 6 making a mil + more a season. Sharks would never swap them 1 for 1. We do like Goodrow and he’s a great depth guy for a playoff team… but sharks aren’t a playoff team so this doesn’t make sense.
May 11, 2023 at 1:04 p.m.
#8
Grierless Sharks Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 3,020
Likes: 947
You need to pay to move Goodrow and need to pay for Bara.

Rangers need to add a high pick in this draft or the next. Sharks would retain too if it was a future 1st. Could probably add a 3rd.
May 11, 2023 at 1:49 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 8,550
Likes: 3,870
Quoting: Shakabakes
6 of the last 8 posts created by Sharks fans that involved the Rangers had Goodrow included in them. Hence, why I felt there was genuine interest.


And if they did, I presume there was an asset attached to that dump and San Jose wasn’t sending a top 6 forward the other way. That’s just ridiculous
May 11, 2023 at 1:51 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 8,550
Likes: 3,870
Quoting: Shakabakes
6 of the last 8 posts created by Sharks fans that involved the Rangers had Goodrow included in them. Hence, why I felt there was genuine interest.


Also, filter out the feed to just sharks central teams and none of them have Goodrow to San Jose. All of the Goodrow to San Jose trades are made by rangers fans making their lineup moves
May 11, 2023 at 4:58 p.m.
#11
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2019
Posts: 3,005
Likes: 879
Quoting: goodfella
You need to pay to move Goodrow and need to pay for Bara.

Rangers need to add a high pick in this draft or the next. Sharks would retain too if it was a future 1st. Could probably add a 3rd.


A Goodrow Buyout provides 100 %Cap relief for the next 2 years. Rangers would go that route before packaging major assets with Goodrow.
May 11, 2023 at 5:37 p.m.
#12
Grierless Sharks Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 3,020
Likes: 947
Quoting: Shakabakes
A Goodrow Buyout provides 100 %Cap relief for the next 2 years. Rangers would go that route before packaging major assets with Goodrow.


Then your issue is if you want Bara and at what cost.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll