SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Moving on

Created by: Tylerh
Team: 2023-24 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: May 17, 2023
Published: May 17, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$3,000,000
1$800,000
1$800,000
2$875,000
2$775,000
2$800,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
4$5,500,000
2$950,000
5$3,500,000
5$4,000,000
1$900,000
Trades
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2023
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
2024
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the OTT
2025
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$83,500,000$81,703,700$0$0$1,796,300
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$925,000$925,000
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$7,350,000$7,350,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$6,962,366$6,962,366
RW
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,000,000$11,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$10,903,000$10,903,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,250,000$3,250,000
LW
UFA - 1
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,100,000$2,100,000
RW, C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$796,667$796,667
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,150,000$1,150,000
RW, C, LW
UFA - 1
$900,000$900,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$800,000$800,000
LW, C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$762,500$762,500
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
$5,500,000$5,500,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,000,000$3,000,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$7,500,000$7,500,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$950,000$950,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$766,667$766,667
G
RFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,100,000$1,100,000
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$800,000$800,000
LD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,625,000$5,625,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
May 17, 2023 at 9:17 a.m.
#1
Gabagool44
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 329
Likes: 32
why Matthews????
May 17, 2023 at 9:18 a.m.
#2
Rip
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2022
Posts: 11,014
Likes: 2,975
Quoting: Gabagool44
why Matthews????


Because Canuck fans love to dream
May 17, 2023 at 9:19 a.m.
#3
Gabagool44
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 329
Likes: 32
Quoting: RipNasty
Because Canuck fans love to dream


Canucks fans will be taking huge L's for the next decade
May 17, 2023 at 10:07 a.m.
#4
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 17,615
Likes: 17,624
Not trading Pettersson for a guy who will leave Vancouver in 2 years
Warpbox liked this.
May 17, 2023 at 10:09 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 139
Likes: 46
As a Canucks fan, I would not want to make this move. EP40 has become a 200ft centre and has the kind of temperament I want as a 1C.
Liljegren is far more valuable than Pearson.. since he could be a top-4 some day.
May 17, 2023 at 10:39 a.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 3,101
Likes: 2,221
Quoting: RipNasty
Because Canuck fans love to dream


It wasn't even made by a Canucks fan? Vancouver wouldn't even accept this. There is a roughly 0% chance Matthews would stay and we aren't going to be pushing for the cup between now and then
May 17, 2023 at 11:13 a.m.
#7
Rip
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2022
Posts: 11,014
Likes: 2,975
Quoting: dereliicte_campaign
As a Canucks fan, I would not want to make this move. EP40 has become a 200ft centre and has the kind of temperament I want as a 1C.
Liljegren is far more valuable than Pearson.. since he could be a top-4 some day.


Matthews is a 200ft centre who is better defensively than EP40. This would be a slam dunk win for you guys. As much as I love Petterson, he's not as good as Matthews.
May 17, 2023 at 12:26 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 10,007
Likes: 9,288
Quoting: RipNasty
Matthews is a 200ft centre who is better defensively than EP40. This would be a slam dunk win for you guys. As much as I love Petterson, he's not as good as Matthews.


Pettersson isn’t as good as Matthews, but he is also an elite 200 ft centre. He also has more team control, while Matthews would be very unlikely to sign an extension with us. The only way the Canucks give up Pettersson for Matthews is if there’s an extension involved, otherwise it doesn’t make any sense
May 17, 2023 at 1:14 p.m.
#9
Rip
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2022
Posts: 11,014
Likes: 2,975
Quoting: mv21227
Pettersson isn’t as good as Matthews, but he is also an elite 200 ft centre. He also has more team control, while Matthews would be very unlikely to sign an extension with us. The only way the Canucks give up Pettersson for Matthews is if there’s an extension involved, otherwise it doesn’t make any sense


And Matthews is going to sign in TO anyways
May 17, 2023 at 2:38 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 39
Likes: 8
I'd rather keep Pettersson. Liljegren is cool, though. Maybe a deal could be worked out there.
May 17, 2023 at 3:05 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 139
Likes: 46
Quoting: RipNasty
Matthews is a 200ft centre who is better defensively than EP40. This would be a slam dunk win for you guys. As much as I love Petterson, he's not as good as Matthews.

Genuinely curious how you are measuring that Mathews is better defensively than EP.
I disagree with that take, but it’s not an easy thing to debate, (same goes for me saying EP40 is better defensively) b/c a lot of it is subjective and nuanced.

Whatever the case, it’s an interesting proposal and your valuation is very fair. I just personally think EP40 has a more well rounded game and seems like he’s still improving.

On the other hand, Mathews could score 70 goals next year. Ha.
May 17, 2023 at 3:47 p.m.
#12
Rip
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2022
Posts: 11,014
Likes: 2,975
Quoting: dereliicte_campaign
Genuinely curious how you are measuring that Mathews is better defensively than EP.
I disagree with that take, but it’s not an easy thing to debate, (same goes for me saying EP40 is better defensively) b/c a lot of it is subjective and nuanced.

Whatever the case, it’s an interesting proposal and your valuation is very fair. I just personally think EP40 has a more well rounded game and seems like he’s still improving.

On the other hand, Mathews could score 70 goals next year. Ha.


Matthews had more defensive touches by a forward than literally every other player in the league last season. He should be a selke finalist every year but that trophy is entirely a reputation award. Marner is a finalist this year and is not as good as Matthews defensively.
May 18, 2023 at 10:35 a.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 139
Likes: 46
Quoting: RipNasty
Matthews had more defensive touches by a forward than literally every other player in the league last season. He should be a selke finalist every year but that trophy is entirely a reputation award. Marner is a finalist this year and is not as good as Matthews defensively.


Agreed it’s often a reputation award. Yet, you can’t argue how defensively dominant guys like datsyuk, mark stone, Bergeron, Barkov are. It jumps off the page.
But you didn’t answer my Q. How do you rank defensive abilities of forwards? Exclusively defensive touches? Genuinely curious, not trying to argue w/ your opinion on matthews.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll