SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Getting C depth

Created by: Jacketsman61
Team: 2023-24 Columbus Blue Jackets
Initial Creation Date: May 26, 2023
Published: May 27, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Montreal in this scenario is enamored with Leo Carlsson. They want him and plan to sign Dubois to an offer sheet come July 1. The Jackets take Will Smith in this scenario as The Sharks take Michkov. For trading down two spots and having to wait a year at least on Will Smith the Jackets get some depth down the middle by getting Dach and Dvorak. The Jackets throw in Roslovic to even the value.

The Jackets land Hanifin to secure the left side of the defense for years to come. The Jackets give up two 1st in the deal while also giving up Boqvist but Hanifin would be a huge get and moving Boqvist opens up a spot for Jiricek to get NHL PT.

The Kings trade is simply getting an expiring contract that is useable to help bridge the gap for Jiricek. Roy is very serviceable and the Kings need to move one and the Jackets move Jake Bean who is also an expiring contract who fills depth on the left side.
Trades
1.
CBJ
  1. Dach, Kirby
  2. Dvorak, Christian
  3. 2023 1st round pick (FLA)
  4. 2023 1st round pick (MTL)
MTL
  1. Roslovic, Jack
  2. 2023 1st round pick (CBJ)
2.
CBJ
  1. Hanifin, Noah
  2. Vladar, Daniel
Additional Details:
Hanifin extends 6x6.5
CGY
  1. Bemström, Emil
  2. Boqvist, Adam
  3. 2023 1st round pick (LAK)
  4. 2023 1st round pick (FLA)
3.
CBJ
  1. Roy, Matt
  2. 2023 5th round pick (LAK)
LAK
  1. Bean, Jake
  2. Bjork, Marcus [RFA Rights]
  3. 2023 2nd round pick (CBJ)
Buyouts
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2023
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the CBJ
2024
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
2025
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the VGK
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$83,500,000$71,805,833$0$4,550,000$11,694,167
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$9,750,000$9,750,000
LW
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,362,500$3,362,500
C, RW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$8,700,000$8,700,000
C, RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$1,850,000$2M)
LW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$4,450,000$4,450,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$1,525,000$1,525,000
LW, C, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$800,000$800,000
RW, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$3,750,000$3,750,000
C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$2,500,000$2,500,000
C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$975,000$975,000
RW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$1,600,000$1,600,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$762,500$762,500
LW, C
RFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$9,583,333$9,583,333
LD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$3,150,000$3,150,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$5,400,000$5,400,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,237,500$1,237,500
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$918,333$918,333 (Performance Bonus$1,000,000$1M)
RD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$1,050,000$1,050,000
G
RFA - 2
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$825,000$825,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$2,750,000$2,750,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$4,000,000$4,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
May 27, 2023 at 6:40 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 1,659
Likes: 711
I don't see Mtl trading those 4 pieces for 2d overall, let alone 3rd.

I could see them trading Dach+5th OVR for 2nd OVR.

At the end of the day, the prices for moving up in the draft are too high. They bring too much risk. If teams rly ask these pieces for changing from 3rd to 5th ovr, it's a surefire way to FastTrack GMs to being relieved of their duties.
Now, if you look at the GMs picking in the top 5, only CLB has a veteran GM...so the rest wouldn't dare take on this risk.
Indy liked this.
May 27, 2023 at 6:40 a.m.
#2
Dekesaladekes
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 2,873
Likes: 1,039
So you have the 3OA pick with the potential of picking a franchise Center prospect in Leo carlsson and instead you trade down to get a lesser prospect and acquire an average 3C in Dvorak and Kirby dach who is terrible at Center and played RW all year for Montreal?

Sure sounds like improving your Center depth.

Boone Jenner is on your 4th line LW and he’s still the best Center on your team.

You are way better of with Leo Carlsson.
And maybe giving him a year longer to develop and running with sillinger and Jenner as your top 6 centers.


Calgary trade I feel is unnecessary too with mateychuk in the system and probably a year or 2 out from cracking the roster
May 27, 2023 at 6:42 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 1,659
Likes: 711
The Jack Roslovic piece is interesting though, MTL would flip him for 1st rd pick 2024 + prospect easy
May 27, 2023 at 6:43 a.m.
#4
Dekesaladekes
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 2,873
Likes: 1,039
Quoting: Ste_Catherine_Street
I don't see Mtl trading those 4 pieces for 2d overall, let alone 3rd.

I could see them trading Dach+5th OVR for 2nd OVR.

At the end of the day, the prices for moving up in the draft are too high. They bring too much risk. If teams rly ask these pieces for changing from 3rd to 5th ovr, it's a surefire way to FastTrack GMs to being relieved of their duties.
Now, if you look at the GMs picking in the top 5, only CLB has a veteran GM...so the rest wouldn't dare take on this risk.



Montreal would jump on that trade in a heartbeat.

Roslovic and Dvorak are of similar skill level one better offensively the other defensively.
Dach isn’t a true Center and was somewhat carried by Suzuki and caufield when he was their RW.

And you get the pick to select Leo Carlsson who has the potential to be Montreal’s franchise Center, he has a much higher ceiling the Suzuki does
Civil_Eng_PE liked this.
May 27, 2023 at 6:50 a.m.
#5
HuGo is a Boss GM
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2021
Posts: 6,921
Likes: 3,023
Everyone has their opinion, but IMO Dach will be a 70-80 point Center in his prime. He protects the puck better than Suzuki. He has great vision and is equally creative. He has started to attack the net.

I am too high on Dach to trade him. I would do something like 5th OA, Florida pick, Dvorak, Kidney to move up and pick 3rd OA.
May 27, 2023 at 6:58 a.m.
#6
Pop Pop
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 14,561
Likes: 8,255
Just take Carlsson 3oa and don't overthink it, if you like Smith better take him. Your risking not getting either here in this deal if the sharks don't want michkov
Ste_Catherine_Street and Indy liked this.
May 27, 2023 at 6:58 a.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 976
Likes: 835
This is pretty interesting. It's one of the few ACGMs where we move 3rd ovr that doesn't instantly make me wanna throw up, so that says something. There's a lot of temping things here and the explanations are very justified. Here would be my list of concerns/criticisms

* Carlsson looks like a world beater right now. The deal is very temping, but I'm wondering if Dach + the other parts is worth the drop, which says a lot about how Carlsson has looked
* No need (or room) for Vladar with Elvis/Tarasov, so I'd take him out and change the value a bit. (Maybe change the LA 1st to CBJ 2nd or something along those lines.
* I like Roy as a player, so I'm cool with picking him up, but givne your explanation, I wouldn't really want to give up pick 34 (on top of whatever value you give Bean) if the plan is just a 1 year stop gap. I'd probably try to change that to our 3rd and drop the 5th in return, but not sure if that's realistic value or not. Regardless, I'd wanna plan to resign Roy if possible, either to an extension or during FA to a 1-2 year deal. Would love him as 1RD and sliding down to 2RD whenever Jiricek is ready, then holding that spot for Ceulemans and allowing Peeke to play a more fitting 3rd pairing spot.

Very very interesting ideas.
May 27, 2023 at 7:47 a.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 1,659
Likes: 711
Quoting: Dekes
Montreal would jump on that trade in a heartbeat.

Roslovic and Dvorak are of similar skill level one better offensively the other defensively.
Dach isn’t a true Center and was somewhat carried by Suzuki and caufield when he was their RW.

And you get the pick to select Leo Carlsson who has the potential to be Montreal’s franchise Center, he has a much higher ceiling the Suzuki does


How many Habs games did you watch last year?
Dach drove the net, carried the puck up the ice, won puck battles.
If anything, he carried Suzuki. His production dropped when Dach got injured.
You're too low on Dach, but ok.
Habs wouldn't do this.
May 27, 2023 at 7:48 a.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 1,659
Likes: 711
Quoting: Dekes
Montreal would jump on that trade in a heartbeat.

Roslovic and Dvorak are of similar skill level one better offensively the other defensively.
Dach isn’t a true Center and was somewhat carried by Suzuki and caufield when he was their RW.

And you get the pick to select Leo Carlsson who has the potential to be Montreal’s franchise Center, he has a much higher ceiling the Suzuki does


Just noticed you're a Bruins fan. Now it makes sense. Any games you watched the Habs play were on NESN with two baffoons calling the game.
May 27, 2023 at 8:18 a.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 245
Likes: 59
Value aside, those saying Dach is not a true center has clearly never watched a single Habs game in their life.
TheRealisticGuy and Xavier02 liked this.
May 27, 2023 at 8:23 a.m.
#11
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 40,124
Likes: 25,038
Matt Roy is too central to our defense for us to trade him, even for the 34th overall pick in this draft and more. We're pretty confident that he'll re-sign with us, so the fact that he's on an expiring contract isn't really a concern, and won't be unless and until we approach the trade deadline next February and we still don't have a deal.
May 27, 2023 at 8:51 a.m.
#12
Habs4Ever
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 4,297
Likes: 1,737
Quoting: Ste_Catherine_Street
I don't see Mtl trading those 4 pieces for 2d overall, let alone 3rd.

I could see them trading Dach+5th OVR for 2nd OVR.

At the end of the day, the prices for moving up in the draft are too high. They bring too much risk. If teams rly ask these pieces for changing from 3rd to 5th ovr, it's a surefire way to FastTrack GMs to being relieved of their duties.
Now, if you look at the GMs picking in the top 5, only CLB has a veteran GM...so the rest wouldn't dare take on this risk.


Mais qu’est-ce que je lis
Une chance t’es pas DG, Dach + 5th OA for Fantilli 😂😂
May 27, 2023 at 8:51 a.m.
#13
Habs4Ever
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 4,297
Likes: 1,737
Quoting: Dekes
So you have the 3OA pick with the potential of picking a franchise Center prospect in Leo carlsson and instead you trade down to get a lesser prospect and acquire an average 3C in Dvorak and Kirby dach who is terrible at Center and played RW all year for Montreal?

Sure sounds like improving your Center depth.

Boone Jenner is on your 4th line LW and he’s still the best Center on your team.

You are way better of with Leo Carlsson.
And maybe giving him a year longer to develop and running with sillinger and Jenner as your top 6 centers.


Calgary trade I feel is unnecessary too with mateychuk in the system and probably a year or 2 out from cracking the roster


Now Leo Carlsson is a Franchise Center prospect
What
May 27, 2023 at 9:32 a.m.
#14
Prime Primeau
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2023
Posts: 5,412
Likes: 2,140
Quoting: Dekes
Montreal would jump on that trade in a heartbeat.

Roslovic and Dvorak are of similar skill level one better offensively the other defensively.
Dach isn’t a true Center and was somewhat carried by Suzuki and caufield when he was their RW.

And you get the pick to select Leo Carlsson who has the potential to be Montreal’s franchise Center, he has a much higher ceiling the Suzuki does


No, Montreal decline. Dach is a center. He played almost all year at center (except the few games with Suzuki and Caufield). Remove 5 overall and add Calgary's pick and it's more fair
May 27, 2023 at 9:45 a.m.
#15
Subbanator
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 7,316
Likes: 3,329
MTL is fine at center so they have no incentive to move up and pick a center. They're likely going to see who is left over between Smith and Michkov, draft one of them and sign PLF later, win - win
May 27, 2023 at 9:54 a.m.
#16
CbjSabresDucks
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 4,721
Likes: 2,180
wayyyy too much for Hanifin, holy cow
Civil_Eng_PE liked this.
May 27, 2023 at 11:08 a.m.
#17
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 4,353
Likes: 851
Quoting: OldNYIfan
Matt Roy is too central to our defense for us to trade him, even for the 34th overall pick in this draft and more. We're pretty confident that he'll re-sign with us, so the fact that he's on an expiring contract isn't really a concern, and won't be unless and until we approach the trade deadline next February and we still don't have a deal.


Interesting take. But serious question, what are the Kings going to do with Spence, Durzi, and Clarke all being RD. Seems overcrowded.
OldNYIfan liked this.
May 27, 2023 at 11:11 a.m.
#18
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 40,124
Likes: 25,038
Quoting: Jacketsman61
Interesting take. But serious question, what are the Kings going to do with Spence, Durzi, and Clarke all being RD. Seems overcrowded.

It IS overcrowded, no doubt. I expect Sean Walker and one of Sean Durzi or Jordan Spence to be traded. It's highly unlikely that Matt Roy gets traded -- one of the primary objectives of this off-season is to find a partner for him.
pocke liked this.
May 27, 2023 at 11:55 a.m.
#19
Indy
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2022
Posts: 378
Likes: 288
Quoting: Ste_Catherine_Street
I don't see Mtl trading those 4 pieces for 2d overall, let alone 3rd.

I could see them trading Dach+5th OVR for 2nd OVR.

At the end of the day, the prices for moving up in the draft are too high. They bring too much risk. If teams rly ask these pieces for changing from 3rd to 5th ovr, it's a surefire way to FastTrack GMs to being relieved of their duties.
Now, if you look at the GMs picking in the top 5, only CLB has a veteran GM...so the rest wouldn't dare take on this risk.


He's also has a reputation to swindle too when he's in the seller's seat so I think most GMs would be cautious too. This is actually the first 3OA trade proposal that doesnt want me to weap for humanity but as you say game theory says that Sharks will possibly take Michkov so what do you gain with those assets being moved basically having your second option land in your lap. Too expensive for Montreal for even two spots when anyother year that 5th pick is basically a 2nd with the amount of skill in this draft.
May 27, 2023 at 12:07 p.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2017
Posts: 611
Likes: 498
I don't think Habs would chose Carlsson and Roslovic over Dach, Michkov, Dvorak and 31st/32nd.
May 27, 2023 at 12:54 p.m.
#21
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 4,353
Likes: 851
Quoting: ohmyjlord
I don't think Habs would chose Carlsson and Roslovic over Dach, Michkov, Dvorak and 31st/32nd.


The Habs aren’t going to take Michkov. Montreal is just like Columbus in the idea they want to be better sooner than later. Waiting three yrs for Michkov is out of the question.
OldNYIfan liked this.
May 29, 2023 at 12:49 a.m.
#22
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2017
Posts: 611
Likes: 498
Quoting: Jacketsman61
The Habs aren’t going to take Michkov. Montreal is just like Columbus in the idea they want to be better sooner than later. Waiting three yrs for Michkov is out of the question.

It doesn't matter...the value just isn't there. Dach + Michkov (even if you have to wait) + Dvorak + 31st/32nd >> Carlsson + Roslovic.
May 29, 2023 at 12:57 a.m.
#23
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 11,742
Likes: 3,094
Quoting: Ste_Catherine_Street
I don't see Mtl trading those 4 pieces for 2d overall, let alone 3rd.

I could see them trading Dach+5th OVR for 2nd OVR.

At the end of the day, the prices for moving up in the draft are too high. They bring too much risk. If teams rly ask these pieces for changing from 3rd to 5th ovr, it's a surefire way to FastTrack GMs to being relieved of their duties.
Now, if you look at the GMs picking in the top 5, only CLB has a veteran GM...so the rest wouldn't dare take on this risk.


Dach is not nearly enough to get to fantilli. Dach had TWENTY even strength points last year.
May 29, 2023 at 6:48 a.m.
#24
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 1,659
Likes: 711
Quoting: dgibb10
Dach is not nearly enough to get to fantilli. Dach had TWENTY even strength points last year.


i said Dach PLUS(+) 5th overall dude applaud
and then I said it's too risky and no one will move in the top 5
May 29, 2023 at 12:14 p.m.
#25
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 11,742
Likes: 3,094
Quoting: Ste_Catherine_Street
i said Dach PLUS(+) 5th overall dude applaud
and then I said it's too risky and no one will move in the top 5


Yes, Dach isn't nearly enough to move up from Will Smith to Fantilli
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll