SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

My best guess - Avs offseason

Created by: bcooke
Team: 2023-24 Colorado Avalanche
Initial Creation Date: May 27, 2023
Published: May 27, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Expecting a fairly quiet summer for the Avs other than trading for a 2C. Keep the D-core together and give Malinski a shot in camp to beat out some combo of Hunt/Johnson/other depth D on PTO.

Cap crunch leads to some young guys getting a shot early in the season. Meyers is due for some positive offensive regression. Foudy is a fit for a middle 6 role. Pavel is a name that keeps coming up as a guy with good fit on the 4th line. Heavy checking game and good in the face-off circle. Really good fit between Cogs and LOC.

This also leaves room to make deadline moves for a wing if Foudy/Meyers/Pavel struggle to fill their roles. This Avs core should have no trouble getting into the playoffs. They need to use the early part of the season to give some young guys a chance to show they can contribute on ELCs. Then upgrade at the TDL for the cup run. Ultimately need to know who can help the core moving forward as Landy comes back and Toews gets extended.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$4,750,000
3$1,050,000
2$2,500,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$1,100,000
3$3,700,000
Trades
COL
  1. Hayes, Kevin ($3,500,000 retained)
PHI
  1. 2023 1st round pick (COL)
Additional Details:
Doubt the Avs pick at 27th OA. Expecting this pick moved for a 2C. Hayes is a better fit in COL than with Torts. Good cheap solution for 2C with Philly retaining.
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2023
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
2024
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
2025
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
21$83,500,000$78,888,929$637,500$137,500$4,611,071
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LW, RW
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$12,600,000$12,600,000
C
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$9,250,000$9,250,000
RW, C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$3,700,000$3,700,000
C, LW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$71,429$71,429
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$6,125,000$6,125,000
RW, LW
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$1,050,000$1,050,000
LW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$2,500,000$2,500,000
C, LW
RFA - 4
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$847,500$847,500 (Performance Bonus$57,500$58K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$1,100,000$1,100,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$870,000$870,000 (Performance Bonus$80,000$80K)
C, LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$1,050,000$1,050,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$4,750,000$4,750,000
LD/RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$9,000,000$9,000,000
RD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$3,400,000$3,400,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$4,100,000$4,100,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$4,500,000$4,500,000
RD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$2,000,000$2,000,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$850,000$850,000
RD
RFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$987,500$987,500
LD/RD, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LW, C
NMC
UFA - 6

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
May 27 at 1:26 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 654
Likes: 81
Workable
Samsoc222 liked this.
May 27 at 1:27 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2016
Posts: 218
Likes: 112
This looks like Philly doing the Av's a huge favor. Id expect a larger return for 3 years of Hayes at that cap hit.
May 27 at 1:48 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 3,192
Likes: 1,178
Quoting: mferraro
This looks like Philly doing the Av's a huge favor. Id expect a larger return for 3 years of Hayes at that cap hit.


Ya I agree. I do think Hayes to Colorado could make some sense but that is too much retention.
mferraro liked this.
May 27 at 1:53 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 355
Likes: 372
Quoting: mferraro
This looks like Philly doing the Av's a huge favor. Id expect a larger return for 3 years of Hayes at that cap hit.


Quoting: Mediumyeet
Ya I agree. I do think Hayes to Colorado could make some sense but that is too much retention.


Price might be off a bit, but several Philly fans have been ok with it. Could see a few additional assets going to Philly or elsewhere to split the retention.
May 27 at 2:00 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2016
Posts: 218
Likes: 112
Quoting: bcooke
Price might be off a bit, but several Philly fans have been ok with it. Could see a few additional assets going to Philly or elsewhere to split the retention.


3 years of retention is almost unheard of in the NHL. Especially when its a 2nd line center at 3.6m. 27th OA doesn't get it done in my opinion. As a Leafs fan id be comfortable giving up our 1st around that range and prospects possibly future mid round picks at that cap hit.

I think the market would be HUGE for Hayes at 3.6m for 3 years.

Edit: Just to add I think its a great idea and creative for the Avs and potentially other teams around the league.
Mediumyeet, radtad and bcooke liked this.
May 27 at 2:07 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 3,192
Likes: 1,178
Quoting: mferraro
3 years of retention is almost unheard of in the NHL. Especially when its a 2nd line center at 3.6m. 27th OA doesn't get it done in my opinion. As a Leafs fan id be comfortable giving up our 1st around that range and prospects possibly future mid round picks at that cap hit.

I think the market would be HUGE for Hayes at 3.6m for 3 years.

Edit: Just to add I think its a great idea and creative for the Avs and potentially other teams around the league.


I agree that is a lot of retention and would give a huge market for Hayes. I see Philly retaining closer to 2mil on him which gives someone Hayes at ≈5mil for 3yrs. That is a good price for either a second or third line C.
mferraro liked this.
May 27 at 2:09 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2019
Posts: 3,324
Likes: 807
Avs could get the same from Haula for free. With so many othet options, I think the Avs should just avoid Hayes
May 27 at 2:18 p.m.
#8
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 355
Likes: 372
Quoting: mferraro
3 years of retention is almost unheard of in the NHL. Especially when its a 2nd line center at 3.6m. 27th OA doesn't get it done in my opinion. As a Leafs fan id be comfortable giving up our 1st around that range and prospects possibly future mid round picks at that cap hit.

I think the market would be HUGE for Hayes at 3.6m for 3 years.

Edit: Just to add I think its a great idea and creative for the Avs and potentially other teams around the league.


Agree that 3 years of retention is rare. Just think Hayes is probably the cheapest 2C available in the trade market with term as far as the cost in assets to aquire. And the Avs don't have a ton of trade chips. Ideally there would be some retention or additional assets going somewhere like Anaheim or Chicago to retain some. If retention isn't an option it, would cost them the ability to resign E-Rod. Likely replacing him with someone looking for a small 1 year prove it deal (Drouin, Toews, etc).

Ultimately the Avs plans will revolve around what it costs to sign Byram and fill 2C.
May 27 at 2:26 p.m.
#9
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 324
Likes: 177
Quoting: mferraro
3 years of retention is almost unheard of in the NHL. Especially when its a 2nd line center at 3.6m. 27th OA doesn't get it done in my opinion. As a Leafs fan id be comfortable giving up our 1st around that range and prospects possibly future mid round picks at that cap hit.

I think the market would be HUGE for Hayes at 3.6m for 3 years.

Edit: Just to add I think its a great idea and creative for the Avs and potentially other teams around the league.


Quoting: Mediumyeet
I agree that is a lot of retention and would give a huge market for Hayes. I see Philly retaining closer to 2mil on him which gives someone Hayes at ≈5mil for 3yrs. That is a good price for either a second or third line C.


Quoting: bcooke
Agree that 3 years of retention is rare. Just think Hayes is probably the cheapest 2C available in the trade market with term as far as the cost in assets to aquire. And the Avs don't have a ton of trade chips. Ideally there would be some retention or additional assets going somewhere like Anaheim or Chicago to retain some. If retention isn't an option it, would cost them the ability to resign E-Rod. Likely replacing him with someone looking for a small 1 year prove it deal (Drouin, Toews, etc).

Ultimately the Avs plans will revolve around what it costs to sign Byram and fill 2C.


The retention is high for sure and I would probably like another decent prospect to go with the 1st but honestly if Danny gets a 1st for Hayes I don’t care what he has to retain to do it. He’s not a part of our future and if he can get a 1st back for him. Good enough lol
May 28 at 12:51 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 3,192
Likes: 1,178
Quoting: Samsoc222
The retention is high for sure and I would probably like another decent prospect to go with the 1st but honestly if Danny gets a 1st for Hayes I don’t care what he has to retain to do it. He’s not a part of our future and if he can get a 1st back for him. Good enough lol


I don't disagree with that but it's often more of an ownership issue retaining. 50% retention is 8.5million over the three years all to get a late 1st round pick. That is a tough sell to ownership. They probably prefer you retain much less and get a mid round pick or whatever instead.
Samsoc222 liked this.
May 28 at 1:19 p.m.
#11
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 324
Likes: 177
Quoting: Mediumyeet
I don't disagree with that but it's often more of an ownership issue retaining. 50% retention is 8.5million over the three years all to get a late 1st round pick. That is a tough sell to ownership. They probably prefer you retain much less and get a mid round pick or whatever instead.


Maybe who knows
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll