SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Trade Machine Proposals

Another idea

Created by: eliasweide
Published: May 27, 2023 at 9:16 p.m.
Salary Cap: $83,500,000
Season Days: 185/186 (99%)
Central Registry Determination: This trade has been rejected because the cap hit of one of the teams is below the lower limit

Logo of the Chicago BlackhawksChicago Blackhawks

OutStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
2023 1st round pick (Logo of the Tampa Bay LightningTBL)---100------
2023 2nd round pick (Logo of the Chicago BlackhawksCHI)---010------
InStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Garland, ConorVancouver CanucksNHL-$4,923,387011---0000--
2023 1st round pick (Logo of the Vancouver CanucksVAN)---100------
ChangeCap SpaceRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Initial$41,844,87713345661310
Change-$4,923,3871110-10
Final$36,921,490 (↓)14 (↑)35 (↑)57 (↑)612 (↓)10000

Logo of the Vancouver CanucksVancouver Canucks

OutStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Garland, ConorVancouver CanucksNHL-$4,923,387011---0000--
2023 1st round pick (Logo of the Vancouver CanucksVAN)---100------
InStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
2023 1st round pick (Logo of the Tampa Bay LightningTBL)---100------
2023 2nd round pick (Logo of the Chicago BlackhawksCHI)---010------
ChangeCap SpaceRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Initial-$668,7501838543513
Change$4,923,387-1-1-1010
Final$4,254,637 (↑)17 (↓)37 (↓)53 (↓)36 (↑)13000
May 27, 2023 at 9:19 p.m.
#1
eliasweide
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 38
Likes: 4
I wasn't sure which second-round pick would make the most sense, so I picked randomly. Scott Powers talked about the Blackhawks moving up in the draft and suggested the Canucks as the best suitable trade partner. Thoughts on something like this happening between the two teams? Canucks save cap space on a long-term contract and the Blackhawks get closer to the cap floor, and get a winger for Bedard
May 28, 2023 at 2:06 a.m.
#2
Aasen6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 1,361
Likes: 593
Vancouver isn’t paying to dump garland he’s not a negative asset, they’d use this package and move up in the draft if anything. If you want Vancouver to trade down take either Myers or OEL
May 28, 2023 at 4:27 a.m.
#3
IjustNEEDaTROYgamble
Lets go Canucklehea
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 2,153
Likes: 209
Quoting: Aasen6
Vancouver isn’t paying to dump garland he’s not a negative asset, they’d use this package and move up in the draft if anything. If you want Vancouver to trade down take either Myers or OEL


OEL is untradable and no one is trading for Myers until after his bonus is paid and wingers like Garland have negative value
Canucks will have to move back to dump Myers, Garland and if they don't do it by the draft the price goes up with more teams having less cap space
May 28, 2023 at 3:57 p.m.
#4
DarthRightus
Bruins are Pond Scum
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2023
Posts: 341
Likes: 66
Quoting: Aasen6
Vancouver isn’t paying to dump garland he’s not a negative asset, they’d use this package and move up in the draft if anything. If you want Vancouver to trade down take either Myers or OEL


Garland is a negative asset just not this big of one.

Myers is a 1 year contract, we're not paying to move him now.
May 28, 2023 at 7:08 p.m.
#5
Dutchies
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2021
Posts: 6,616
Likes: 4,756
Quoting: Aasen6
Vancouver isn’t paying to dump garland he’s not a negative asset, they’d use this package and move up in the draft if anything. If you want Vancouver to trade down take either Myers or OEL


Myers is the choice, since he's only one year. VAN is stuck with OEL
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll