exo2769
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 14,955
Likes: 8,539
I'm hopeful the Hawks could do better than this, but ultimatley if this is what it is...I guess.
NYI, sounds good to me.
TOR, would prefer the NYR 2nd, but that's really just a homer comment. Those are minor details. I like the overall theme of the TOR trade.
PIT, It's a big jump up...#28 - #14. Still $11M owed to Granlund though.
The VAN trade is just no good imo. For a few reasons.
A.) TMyers is owed a $5M bonus. Maybe Hawks management saw the ticket sales from the #1 OA and told KD that he can spend that cash, but I have to think VAN has $5M too. If VAN does, which they do, then they could get a team like AZ to take on TMyers cap it for only $1M. Seems like an AZ special to be honest and something VAN should do rather than trade him away. All depends on the Money I guess.
B.) Garland is a change of scenery player. the Hawks certainly aren't paying FOR his Servies. if VAN wants to pay in order to drop him, we'll think about it.
C.) Per one of the most aggressive charts to move up in the draft. (Link below). The Hawks are WAY overpaying for the #11 pick. That VAN 2024 2nd rounder will be a better pick that CHI's 2024 pick. We should keep it. OR If you factor in the dumps...Drop the TBL 1st, then they can have their 2024 2nd back.
https://soundofhockey.com/2022/06/06/examining-the-value-of-nhl-draft-picks/