SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Mock-Draft

Dmen go early as usual

Dmen go early as usual

Draft Class: 2023
Created By: AlTintin1122
Published: Jun. 1, 2023 at 10:32 a.m.
Jun. 1, 2023 at 11:15 a.m.
#1
Joe
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2022
Posts: 7,805
Likes: 5,676
If all three of the top 3 RHD are gone by 17 I'd be kinda disappointed.
Jun. 1, 2023 at 11:23 a.m.
#2
SK
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 912
Likes: 291
I agree. I have Reinbacher at 5, ASP at 7 and Willander at 20. WPG says... *YOINK* to Cristall at 18, since I have him at 12.
Jun. 1, 2023 at 1:16 p.m.
#3
mokumboi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 30,119
Likes: 11,613
The Blues are not taking two tiny offensive defensemen and a winger (though it would be almost impossible to pass up Barlow at #25).

Probably would be Moore or Willander at #10, let's say they go Barlow at #25 and then probably LIndstein/Molendyk/Price or Stramel at #29.
Jun. 1, 2023 at 9:05 p.m.
#4
aldore
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2022
Posts: 256
Likes: 67
Quoting: mokumboi
The Blues are not taking two tiny offensive defensemen and a winger (though it would be almost impossible to pass up Barlow at #25).

Probably would be Moore or Willander at #10, let's say they go Barlow at #25 and then probably LIndstein/Molendyk/Price or Stramel at #29.


Where do you have Danielson in relation to Moore as far as center rankings go?
Jun. 1, 2023 at 9:28 p.m.
#5
mokumboi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 30,119
Likes: 11,613
Quoting: aldore
Where do you have Danielson in relation to Moore as far as center rankings go?


The next best one, or maybe even with Ritchie after Moore and Dvorsky. And he's a total Blues type player. I certainly would be happy to have him.
Jun. 1, 2023 at 9:50 p.m.
#6
aldore
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2022
Posts: 256
Likes: 67
Quoting: mokumboi
The next best one, or maybe even with Ritchie after Moore and Dvorsky. And he's a total Blues type player. I certainly would be happy to have him.


I wanted Reinbacher or Moore at 10 for the longest time. I think Reinbacher will be off the board and am leaning danielson>Moore as of late. Would be happy with either tho. I’ve seen a lot of people talk about wallinder getting there but I’m unsure at 10. Think the C might be more important with the D I hope are available at the later picks
mokumboi liked this.
Jun. 1, 2023 at 10:04 p.m.
#7
mokumboi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 30,119
Likes: 11,613
Quoting: aldore
I wanted Reinbacher or Moore at 10 for the longest time. I think Reinbacher will be off the board and am leaning danielson>Moore as of late. Would be happy with either tho. I’ve seen a lot of people talk about wallinder getting there but I’m unsure at 10. Think the C might be more important with the D I hope are available at the later picks


Yeah, the 10 pick is in the range of some excellent C's and only one or two Dmen worth the pick. The picks we have in the 20's will be right in the range of some really solid LDs, and maybe Bonk, as well. Something like Moore, Bonk and Lindstein/Molendyk/Price would be sweet. The thought of Moore centering Kyrou is mouthwatering.

At the same time, there will likely still be a couple of nice C's left in the 20's. So something like Reinbacher, Stramel and one of the LDs also works for me. Whatever the plan, we really need to hit a grand slam with this draft, and that includes any relevant trading. This is the year to smash it, and we have the picks to do so. It better be done right.

Of course, if both Moore and Reinbacher are already gone at 10, I am all for trying to trade down a few spots for a goodie and grabbing Danielson. That works for me, as well.
Jun. 1, 2023 at 10:16 p.m.
#8
aldore
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2022
Posts: 256
Likes: 67
Quoting: mokumboi
Yeah, the 10 pick is in the range of some excellent C's and only one or two Dmen worth the pick. The picks we have in the 20's will be right in the range of some really solid LDs, and maybe Bonk, as well. Something like Moore, Bonk and Lindstein/Molendyk/Price would be sweet. The thought of Moore centering Kyrou is mouthwatering.

At the same time, there will likely still be a couple of nice C's left in the 20's. So something like Reinbacher, Stramel and one of the LDs also works for me. Whatever the plan, we really need to hit a grand slam with this draft, and that includes any relevant trading. This is the year to smash it, and we have the picks to do so. It better be done right.

Of course, if both Moore and Reinbacher are already gone at 10, I am all for trying to trade down a few spots for a goodie and grabbing Danielson. That works for me, as well.


Wouldn’t hate Edson at one of the late picks either. Also, if michkov fell to 10 you couldn’t pass it up
Jun. 1, 2023 at 10:20 p.m.
#9
mokumboi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 30,119
Likes: 11,613
Quoting: aldore
Wouldn’t hate Edson at one of the late picks either. Also, if michkov fell to 10 you couldn’t pass it up


Yeah, Edstrom fits the profile. If Michkov falls to #10, I say trade down with some GM who's in love with him. We could then get Danielson AND a deluxe goodie. But I don't think it's realistic to think he could drop to 10.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll