Stovetop
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 1,832
Likes: 811
Interesting that preds fans think the value is off on EK65. I get if you think it doesn't make sense for the team, but the Value is objectively skewed massively in the preds favor here.
A late first, a bad depth player who's an RFA, an underperforming cap dump center, a c+ prospect, and a future second? Thats god awful value for EK on a 9.5 mil contract.
Also the Tony D comparison that someone made is just laughable. The only thing they have in common is that they are offense focused. Anyone who actually watches EK knows whos great at defending off the rush, intercepting passes, and blocking shots. His weakness is when he gets stuck defending the cycle and board battles as well as getting out of position. In a more structured system he's very good defensively.