SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Stolen Ideas

Created by: Hammerwise
Team: 2023-24 Philadelphia Flyers
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 7, 2023
Published: Jun. 7, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
stolen ideas from other posters.....

lots of youth with a top/high end prospect at every position, at least one youngster on every line and lots of somewhat reclamation projects: Lefreniere, Jokiharju, roslovic....and cap space.

And if some of these guys arent the right fit, (Roslovic, Jokiharju, etc...) they can de dealt (and PHI could retain)

Its about playing the youth, getting more draft capitol, acquiring more quality prospects and trying to see if we can develop a couple of still young guys who have stalled elsewhere
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
1$1,475,000
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$975,000
3$975,000
3$975,000
3$2,475,000
3$2,975,000
3$2,775,000
3$2,775,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
6$6,275,000
Trades
1.
PHI
  1. Roslovic, Jack
  2. 2024 3rd round pick (LAK)
CBJ
  1. Hayes, Kevin ($1,142,857 retained)
2.
PHI
  1. Formenton, Alex [Reserve List]
  2. Sokolov, Egor [RFA Rights]
  3. Thomson, Lassi
  4. 2024 4th round pick (TBL)
  5. 2025 1st round pick (OTT)
  6. 2025 3rd round pick (OTT)
Additional Details:
Two solid prospects, Formenton (if cleared) in summer is a solid player, the picks are 2025, which costs the 2024 4th
3.
PHI
  1. Hirvonen, Roni
  2. 2024 1st round pick (TOR)
4.
PHI
  1. 2024 6th round pick (TBL)
  2. 2025 4th round pick (TBL)
  3. 2025 6th round pick (TBL)
5.
6.
PHI
  1. 2023 2nd round pick (TOR)
  2. 2024 3rd round pick (TOR)
SEA
  1. Deangelo, Anthony ($2,000,000 retained)
7.
PHI
  1. Goodrow, Barclay
  2. Lafrenière, Alexis [RFA Rights]
Additional Details:
goodrow close to a cap dump, so its approx a 2024 1st, a 2nd (Jay Obrien compensation), 3rd and 4th (goodrow dump)
NYR
  1. O'Brien, Jay [Reserve List]
  2. 2024 1st round pick (TOR)
  3. 2024 3rd round pick (TOR)
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2023
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the PHI
2024
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the PHI
2025
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the PHI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
24$83,500,000$77,621,191$1,187,500$495,000$5,878,809
Left WingCentreRight Wing
$2,775,000$2,775,000
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$7,750,000$7,750,000
C
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$5,875,000$5,875,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$2,975,000$2,975,000
C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$863,333$863,333
RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$2,475,000$2,475,000
C, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$2,000,000$2,000,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$1,500,000$1,500,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$1,750,000$1,750,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the New York Rangers
$3,641,667$3,641,667
C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$825,000$825,000 (Performance Bonus$37,500$38K)
C, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$785,000$785,000
RW
RFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$2,775,000$2,775,000
LD/RD
RFA - 2
$6,275,000$6,275,000
RD
UFA - 8
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$859,167$859,167 (Performance Bonus$32,500$32K)
G
RFA - 1
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$6,250,000$6,250,000
LD/RD
NTC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$5,100,000$5,100,000
RD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$2,650,000$2,650,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$775,000$775,000
LD/RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$975,000$975,000
RD
RFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$6,250,000$6,250,000
RD
UFA - 4
Taxi Squad
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$918,333$918,333 ($0$0$0$0) (Performance Bonus$475,000$475K)
C
RFA - 3
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$894,167$894,167 ($0$0$0$0) (Performance Bonus$525,000$525K)
RW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$856,667$856,667 ($0$0$0$0)
LW
RFA - 2
$1,475,000$1,475,000 ($325,000$325K$325,000$325K)
LW
RFA
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$863,333$863,333 ($0$0$0$0) (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$847,500$847,500 ($0$0$0$0) (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$903,333$903,333 ($0$0$0$0) (Performance Bonus$32,500$32K)
LD
RFA - 3

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jun. 7, 2023 at 6:47 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2021
Posts: 2,200
Likes: 1,668
No thx, too much and our priority top 4 D and goalie.
BUFF36, sabres89, Hammerwise and 1 other person liked this.
Jun. 7, 2023 at 6:52 a.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 5,592
Likes: 4,729
Well give that idea back! While I really like Konecny, Buffalo needs a Dman a bit more than more scoring. Not getting both Ostlund and Rosen
sabres89, Hammerwise, wojme and 1 other person liked this.
Jun. 7, 2023 at 7:36 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 3,041
Likes: 1,024
Insane overpay for Laughton; dude has career high of 18 goals - Engvall territory - and you want a 1st + decent prospect. Laughably ridiculous
Jun. 7, 2023 at 7:44 a.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2018
Posts: 6,310
Likes: 2,226
Quoting: MitchJr
Insane overpay for Laughton; dude has career high of 18 goals - Engvall territory - and you want a 1st + decent prospect. Laughably ridiculous


Points are everything? Insane overpay for a guy who plays all 3 positions, any situation, plays with grit and leadership and on a team that CAN'T score but he still gets 35-45 pts in less than top 6 minutes.

But thats fine, the leafs are all good, and dont need any of that. Since you used engvall = you got a good 3rd for a guy who has scored 15 goals once/over 30 pts once, was a 2mil+ expiring UFA who didnt excel at anything, comparing engvall to laughton is laughably ridiculous.

Is it an overpay? Yes, but then he doesnt need to be traded and is exactly what TOR needs, do you think they get reasonably priced quality for an under offer? Leafs spend every season looking for leadership, two way play and grit, and have given up far more for temporary solutions than this. I've seen your schtick before, you dont think Laughton is worth it, thats fine.
Jun. 7, 2023 at 7:45 a.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2018
Posts: 6,310
Likes: 2,226
Quoting: BUFF36
Well give that idea back! While I really like Konecny, Buffalo needs a Dman a bit more than more scoring. Not getting both Ostlund and Rosen


Alright PHI adds Seeler. (hahaha)
BUFF36 liked this.
Jun. 7, 2023 at 7:47 a.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 5,592
Likes: 4,729
Quoting: Hammerwise
Alright PHI adds Seeler. (hahaha)


And Buffalo takes out Rosen and adds Kisakov
Hammerwise liked this.
Jun. 7, 2023 at 7:47 a.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 2,267
Likes: 699
Leafs decline
Hammerwise and PhillyDip123 liked this.
Jun. 7, 2023 at 7:50 a.m.
#8
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2018
Posts: 6,310
Likes: 2,226
Quoting: BUFF36
And Buffalo takes out Rosen and adds Kisakov


Hahaha, no thanks to Kisakov.....

While its a huge offer, (I found it on a BUF thread, not my idea), its what it'll take from PHI probably, and one of the only big over offers I've seen. Most proposals for Koneckny are a late round 1st and a meh prospect, which probably isnt enough for PHI, who don;t have to move him EXCEPT for an overpayment. But I appreciate for most BUF fans its too much
BUFF36 liked this.
Jun. 7, 2023 at 7:51 a.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 5,592
Likes: 4,729
Quoting: Hammerwise
Hahaha, no thanks to Kisakov.....

While its a huge offer, (I found it on a BUF thread, not my idea), its what it'll take from PHI probably, and one of the only big over offers I've seen. Most proposals for Koneckny are a late round 1st and a meh prospect, which probably isnt enough for PHI, who don;t have to move him EXCEPT for an overpayment. But I appreciate for most BUF fans its too much


How about Poltapov instead of Kisakov. He was the 33rd pick a couple years ago.
Jun. 7, 2023 at 8:07 a.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 3,041
Likes: 1,024
Quoting: Hammerwise
Points are everything? Insane overpay for a guy who plays all 3 positions, any situation, plays with grit and leadership and on a team that CAN'T score but he still gets 35-45 pts in less than top 6 minutes.

But thats fine, the leafs are all good, and dont need any of that. Since you used engvall = you got a good 3rd for a guy who has scored 15 goals once/over 30 pts once, was a 2mil+ expiring UFA who didnt excel at anything, comparing engvall to laughton is laughably ridiculous.

Is it an overpay? Yes, but then he doesnt need to be traded and is exactly what TOR needs, do you think they get reasonably priced quality for an under offer? Leafs spend every season looking for leadership, two way play and grit, and have given up far more for temporary solutions than this. I've seen your schtick before, you dont think Laughton is worth it, thats fine.


The league is full of players that have ‘grit’ - work hard, take the body, show leadership, win face offs. I’m not discounting that but bottom 6 players can be obtained (Acciari for example) at lower aav and no acquisition cost. And Yes points matter more than anything else; offense is what pays the bills. Players like Laughton are valuable but in no scenario, under no circumstances, in no way are they worth a 1st round draft pick +. Just insanity to try to argue that but keep on trying
Hammerwise liked this.
Jun. 7, 2023 at 8:07 a.m.
#11
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2018
Posts: 6,310
Likes: 2,226
Quoting: BUFF36
How about Poltapov instead of Kisakov. He was the 33rd pick a couple years ago.


No thanks, 10 pts in 73 KHL games doesn;t scream out to me for Poltapov. Would take Ryan Johnson though, (even though PHI is pretty set at LD). I think it was the immense over offer quality of the offer, although to be fair the original poser had TWO 2nds in the deal with PHI including Seeler, so I lessened it.
Jun. 7, 2023 at 8:26 a.m.
#12
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2018
Posts: 6,310
Likes: 2,226
Edited Jun. 7, 2023 at 8:31 a.m.
Quoting: MitchJr
The league is full of players that have ‘grit’ - work hard, take the body, show leadership, win face offs. I’m not discounting that but bottom 6 players can be obtained (Acciari for example) at lower aav and no acquisition cost. And Yes points matter more than anything else; offense is what pays the bills. Players like Laughton are valuable but in no scenario, under no circumstances, in no way are they worth a 1st round draft pick +. Just insanity to try to argue that but keep on trying


I get what you're saying but again, Acciari is not a Laughton. In the simplest terms, acciari had a career high of 27 pts back in 2017 or 2018, and has been pretty pedestrian/an afterthought in the bottom 6 since, similar to Motte and a dozen other guys. Its also Accari was a 1mil+ UFA, and TOR didnt just give up a solid midlevel prospect, a 1st, a 2nd, a 3rd and a 4th for O'Reilly alone, so Accairi did cost some of that. Theres a contract and age difference too, but as you've posted before if Laughton is an Engvall or an Acciari to you, we'll never agree.
And Toronto doesn;t lack on offense, they lack on all around skill, leadership and yes, grit that can play in top 6-8 minutes. Theres a reason leafs have brought in Foligno, Nash, Ritchie, Bunting, O'reilly, Clifford, Simmonds, Gabriel, Lafferty, Acciari in the past 2-3 yrs, its to bring top 9 grit, and hopefully some production with it.

Laughton comparables, much older guys like expiring and more expensive UFAs Foligno and O@reilly brought in a 1st and more by Toronto alone
Jun. 7, 2023 at 8:36 a.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 3,041
Likes: 1,024
Quoting: Hammerwise
I get what you're saying but again, Acciari is not a Laughton. In the simplest terms, acciari had a career high of 27 pts back in 2017 or 2018, and has been pretty pedestrian/an afterthought in the bottom 6 since, similar to Motte and a dozen other guys. Its also Accari was a 1mil+ UFA, and TOR didnt just give up a solid midlevel prospect, a 1st, a 2nd, a 3rd and a 4th for O'Reilly alone, so Accairi did cost some of that. Theres a contract and age difference too, but as you've posted before if Laughton is an Engvall or an Acciari to you, we'll never agree.


ROR went for 1st + 3rd (4th was retention); Acciari most likely for second. So when we talk about Acciari who has more grit (& lower aav) than Laughton points matter but when we talk about Laughton, points don’t matter as much because he has grit ? What? And you discount Engvall as a comparison because he has similar goals but lacks ‘grit’? 🤯Agree to disagree, Laughton is bottom 6 (3C) on a terrible flyers team - he’d be 4th line on Leafs. Just unwise to waste valuable assets on 4th liners making $3M
Jun. 7, 2023 at 8:39 a.m.
#14
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2018
Posts: 6,310
Likes: 2,226
Quoting: MitchJr
ROR went for 1st + 3rd (4th was retention); Acciari most likely for second. So when we talk about Acciari who has more grit (& lower aav) than Laughton points matter but when we talk about Laughton, points don’t matter as much because he has grit ? What? And you discount Engvall as a comparison because he has similar goals but lacks ‘grit’? 🤯Agree to disagree, Laughton is bottom 6 (3C) on a terrible flyers team - he’d be 4th line on Leafs. Just unwise to waste valuable assets on 4th liners making $3M


So a UFA to be, career high 27 pts 5 seasons ago, Accairi is worth a 2nd but Laughton, the much better player on a worse team, isn;t worth a 1st and a bit more?

And hes on your 4th line, you'd be winning 2nd rounds, because your top 9 would be far better. Im not saying Laughton is a top 6 guy, but hes be the best 3rd liner on the present Leafs team.
Jun. 7, 2023 at 9:09 a.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 225
Likes: 173
On the Hayes deal, I suspect it will be a younger winger (Foudy or Bemstrom if Torts has any input) rather than Roslovic coming back. Also I think the retainage for Hayes will get him closer to $5 million per year which may end up being a different pick or another pick being included. All depends on what is deemed the price for 1 million in retainage by the GM's. As of now, it's difficult to extrapolate how much the Provorov 30% retainage is actually worth pick wise.

Ex: Bemstrom/Foudy/Bean, '23 CBJ 4th rounder, and '24 LA 3rd rounder for Kevin Hayes w/ $2,142,857 retained
Hammerwise liked this.
Jun. 7, 2023 at 9:10 a.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 3,041
Likes: 1,024
Quoting: Hammerwise
So a UFA to be, career high 27 pts 5 seasons ago, Accairi is worth a 2nd but Laughton, the much better player on a worse team, isn;t worth a 1st and a bit more?

And hes on your 4th line, you'd be winning 2nd rounds, because your top 9 would be far better. Im not saying Laughton is a top 6 guy, but hes be the best 3rd liner on the present Leafs team.


You are all over the place here - first points don’t matter that much , now they do. Disagree that Laughton is much better player than Acciari - they score at similar rate, Laughton produces much higher points but Acciari is much grittier. Leafs can sign FA Max Domi for similar aav as Laughton (no aquisition cost) and he produces more points. You still seriously going to argue leafs would be justified sending a 1st + prospect for Laughton? Come on man
Jun. 7, 2023 at 9:35 a.m.
#17
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2018
Posts: 6,310
Likes: 2,226
Quoting: MitchJr
You are all over the place here - first points don’t matter that much , now they do. Disagree that Laughton is much better player than Acciari - they score at similar rate, Laughton produces much higher points but Acciari is much grittier. Leafs can sign FA Max Domi for similar aav as Laughton (no aquisition cost) and he produces more points. You still seriously going to argue leafs would be justified sending a 1st + prospect for Laughton? Come on man


Just never mind....Laughton is more than pts, I said that in the beggining, you compared his goal totals to "Engvall territory". Then you said Acciari was acquired for nothing, then you said he cost a 2nd.You made it about offense, now you're pivoting again.... And when it comes to measurable stats, most of which Laughton has in spades over Accairi. If you truly think toronto gave a 2nd for an expiring Accairi, a 27 pt career high 5 yrs ago, a 12-13 minute a night player, etc, is better than Laughton who plays more minutes, has more Takeaways, is a candidate for captain, has more hits, more pts on a lesser club, are even equal than just stop commenting, we get it. Resign Acciari and best wishes, its a ACGM, and your opinion is not supported by stats, and is just your opinion.

And you think you can get Domi for 3mil?

Good luck dude
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll