SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Help Leafs Cap Again

Created by: MikeyVC97
Team: 2023-24 Chicago Blackhawks
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 6, 2023
Published: Jul. 6, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
3$925,000
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$2,000,000
Trades
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
Recapture Fees
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CHI
2025
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
2026
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
24$83,500,000$69,130,125$0$3,105,000$14,369,875
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000
C
RFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,250,000$4,250,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LW, C, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$505,000$505K)
LW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$758,333$758,333
RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
RW, C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$775,000$775,000 (Performance Bonus$325,000$325K)
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,650,000$2,650,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,200,000$1,200,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$916,667$916,667 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$9,500,000$9,500,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,800,000$3,800,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,250,000$1,250,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,400,000$4,400,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$962,500$962,500
G
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$918,333$918,333 (Performance Bonus$1,000,000$1M)
LD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$856,667$856,667
RD
RFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,100,000$1,100,000
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$950,000$950,000
C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$916,667$916,667 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$800,000$800,000
LW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$800,000$800,000
RW, C
RFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jul. 6, 2023 at 12:15 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2023
Posts: 2
Likes: 1
Not happening
CapFriendlysFinest liked this.
Jul. 6, 2023 at 12:18 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 1,674
Likes: 468
Yeah no, Murray will likely be bought out or the only sweetener that has been heard going back with Murray is Robertson.
Jul. 6, 2023 at 12:20 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 1,266
Likes: 1,984
Why would Hawks help them like this. Seems terribly one sided in favor of the Leafs. Leafs need help in the present & should be made to pay for it w/their future.
Hawksguy81, Garak and vikhodush liked this.
Jul. 6, 2023 at 12:20 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 455
Likes: 595
I think any trade revolving around Murray going to CHI is past its "sell by" date.
Hawksguy81, Garak and PaulKorea liked this.
Jul. 6, 2023 at 12:23 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
MikeyVC97
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 965
Likes: 154
Quoting: YeahRighttt
Why would Hawks help them like this. Seems terribly one sided in favor of the Leafs. Leafs need help in the present & should be made to pay for it w/their future.


Niemla is a top RD prospect that could actually be part of the Hawks future. Hawks definitely get something back in this deal.
Sjohns8888 liked this.
Jul. 6, 2023 at 12:30 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 1,266
Likes: 1,984
Quoting: MikeyVC97
Niemla is a top RD prospect that could actually be part of the Hawks future. Hawks definitely get something back in this deal.

He has got potential no doubt, but jury is still out. He is 21 & played a total of 6 games of North American hockey. Leafs are over a barrel & need to make something happen to get cap compliant. I think they should be paying more than 1 possible D prospect for this help.
Garak and vikhodush liked this.
Jul. 6, 2023 at 12:33 p.m.
#7
NoQuitInNewYork
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 2,124
Likes: 743
No. Murray will be bought out most likely.
Garak liked this.
Jul. 6, 2023 at 12:47 p.m.
#8
Cowan Season
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2022
Posts: 2,509
Likes: 1,026
Quoting: YeahRighttt
Why would Hawks help them like this. Seems terribly one sided in favor of the Leafs. Leafs need help in the present & should be made to pay for it w/their future.


Not one sided, Timmins is a great bottom pair D/7th D but Niemela is an extremely good prospect.
Sjohns8888 liked this.
Jul. 6, 2023 at 12:53 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 1,266
Likes: 1,984
Quoting: CameronSquires
Not one sided, Timmins is a great bottom pair D/7th D but Niemela is an extremely good prospect.

I appreciate your opinion but will need to see more before I could agree.
CameronSquires liked this.
Jul. 6, 2023 at 12:56 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2022
Posts: 9,308
Likes: 11,430
Only team that can buy out Murray is the Leafs. If he is traded to the Hawks, he's here all season. And neither Korchinski or Niemela are ready to play in the NHL.
LivingAnew liked this.
Jul. 6, 2023 at 1:09 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 455
Likes: 595
Quoting: CameronSquires
Not one sided, Timmins is a great bottom pair D/7th D but Niemela is an extremely good prospect.


The problem with any Murray trade to CHI now is that the buyout window is closed (I think) for the Hawks to buy him out (a la Bailey). If that's true, it means we must keep him on the roster. And in so doing, we deprive Soderblom of NHL time HE needs to develop. And if we sent Soderblom down to the AHL again (unsure that's workable now in his case), it'd obstruct two other goalies we have down there from getting their development time.

That's why I say that the time of sending Murray to the Hawks has passed. I think CHI would have been willing to move up in the 2023 draft to get the Boston first round pick that TOR held, and give TOR a second in the deal. (I have to think that Easton Cown would still have been available in the second round, but who knows?) That way, Murry would be totally off TOR's books and TOR could still have had a good pick. Alas, that time has passed for the Hawks. Or, I should say, that any deal NOW for the Hawks to take Murray has to be a LOT better than before the buyout window closed. My sense is that TOR will just buy him out, now.

He's all yours. Good luck.
YeahRighttt liked this.
Jul. 6, 2023 at 1:15 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2023
Posts: 94
Likes: 16
I don’t understand how other teams keep saying the leafs are bent over a barrel or in cap hell. We can easily buy Murray out and it costs 600k against the cap this year and 2 mil next. We have 17,650,000 in just Brodie, klingberg, Bertuzzi and domi expiring. And the cap is going up about 4 mil. We can afford to eat 2 mil buyout of Murray.

Why would we give up a ton of assets to move that contract?

If your Chicago you have 11 million in cap space this year with the team above. Why would you not try and weaponize that and get any assets you can?

To say that getting Timmins a young roster player and niemela a top D prospect is not enough is insane!
Jul. 6, 2023 at 1:18 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2023
Posts: 94
Likes: 16
Quoting: LivingAnew
The problem with any Murray trade to CHI now is that the buyout window is closed (I think) for the Hawks to buy him out (a la Bailey). If that's true, it means we must keep him on the roster. And in so doing, we deprive Soderblom of NHL time HE needs to develop. And if we sent Soderblom down to the AHL again (unsure that's workable now in his case), it'd obstruct two other goalies we have down there from getting their development time.

That's why I say that the time of sending Murray to the Hawks has passed. I think CHI would have been willing to move up in the 2023 draft to get the Boston first round pick that TOR held, and give TOR a second in the deal. (I have to think that Easton Cown would still have been available in the second round, but who knows?) That way, Murry would be totally off TOR's books and TOR could still have had a good pick. Alas, that time has passed for the Hawks. Or, I should say, that any deal NOW for the Hawks to take Murray has to be a LOT better than before the buyout window closed. My sense is that TOR will just buy him out, now.

He's all yours. Good luck.


Why couldn’t you just bury Murray or Mrazek in the minors and take the assets?
Jul. 6, 2023 at 1:23 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 455
Likes: 595
Quoting: Sjohns8888
Why couldn’t you just bury Murray or Mrazek in the minors and take the assets?


Perhaps that is a possibility... Honestly, I don't know the arcane rules governing the process of "burying" someone in the minors. What are costs/limitations of doing that?
Jul. 6, 2023 at 1:28 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 1,266
Likes: 1,984
Leafs are currently almost 9 mil over the cap . Buying Murray out doesn’t get them compliant. They need to do something else & everyone knows it. The cap going up next year doesn’t help them in the here & now. Nothing personal, it’s just business.
Hawks got goalies in the minors they want to develop also , namely Commesso. Why take starts away from him for an old goalie, especially if the assets they would get are only mildly appealing?
vikhodush liked this.
Jul. 6, 2023 at 1:31 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2023
Posts: 94
Likes: 16
Quoting: LivingAnew
Perhaps that is a possibility... Honestly, I don't know the arcane rules governing the process of "burying" someone in the minors. What are costs/limitations of doing that?


They have to go through waivers and then a portion of the contract goes against the cap. Which wouldn’t be an issue for Chicago as they have plenty of cap space remaining.
Jul. 6, 2023 at 1:41 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2023
Posts: 94
Likes: 16
Quoting: YeahRighttt
Leafs are currently almost 9 mil over the cap . Buying Murray out doesn’t get them compliant. They need to do something else & everyone knows it. The cap going up next year doesn’t help them in the here & now. Nothing personal, it’s just business.
Hawks got goalies in the minors they want to develop also , namely Commesso. Why take starts away from him for an old goalie, especially if the assets they would get are only mildly appealing?


But moving Muzzin to LTIR does get them cap compliant….
Jul. 6, 2023 at 1:53 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 455
Likes: 595
Quoting: Sjohns8888
They have to go through waivers and then a portion of the contract goes against the cap. Which wouldn’t be an issue for Chicago as they have plenty of cap space remaining.


How much of a portion and for how long? Also, I assume "minors" means the AHL? So, a player "buried" there takes up a roster spot on that team, too? I wouldn't want Murray to take time and space away from our goalie development in Rockford, either. Do AHL teams have "healthy scratches"?

I guess I'd need to learn of the full costs, including opportunity costs (as in taking time and development away from others), before making a deal with this in mind. (Not that you have to provide them for me; I'd just need to know more about this option properly to evaluate such a deal.) If anyone can enlighten me (or steer me to a resource to do so, myself) , I'd appreciate it.

Cheers
vikhodush liked this.
Jul. 6, 2023 at 1:53 p.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 1,266
Likes: 1,984
Quoting: Sjohns8888
But moving Muzzin to LTIR does get them cap compliant….

I’m could be wrong but it appears that they are over cap w/Muzzin already on LTIR. Or am I reading it incorrectly?
LivingAnew liked this.
Jul. 6, 2023 at 2:03 p.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 455
Likes: 595
Quoting: YeahRighttt
I’m could be wrong but it appears that they are over cap w/Muzzin already on LTIR. Or am I reading it incorrectly?


Question about LTIR... My understanding is that the cap hit for all players - including those on LTIR - applies to the team roster and cap on the first day of the season. On the second day, the LTIR player(s) can then again count as "overage" that a team can use to exceed the cap. But not the first day. Is this correct? If so, any team exceeding the cap with an LTIR player must adjust their roster for that first day, limiting their flexibility, yes?

Sorry, I'm not a "capologist;" this area is murky to me, too.
Jul. 6, 2023 at 2:03 p.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2023
Posts: 94
Likes: 16
Quoting: YeahRighttt
I’m could be wrong but it appears that they are over cap w/Muzzin already on LTIR. Or am I reading it incorrectly?


It has him listed on LTIR but his cap hit is still counted. If you’re looking on the site. It says it right under the cap hit. Preseason LTIR candidate- $5,625,000. Were really only 3.2 over before a Murray buyout.
Jul. 6, 2023 at 2:05 p.m.
#22
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 1,266
Likes: 1,984
Quoting: Sjohns8888
It has him listed on LTIR but his cap hit is still counted. If you’re looking on the site. It says it right under the cap hit. Preseason LTIR candidate- $5,625,000. Were really only 3.2 over before a Murray buyout.

Thank you.
Jul. 6, 2023 at 2:09 p.m.
#23
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2023
Posts: 94
Likes: 16
Quoting: YeahRighttt
Thank you.


https://puckpedia.com/LTIR22
Jul. 6, 2023 at 2:10 p.m.
#24
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 1,157
Likes: 1,512
I would still consider Murray as a dump, but he is owed 6 million actual salary so the juice has to be worth the squeeze. Hawks can either float with 5 goalies playing the odds that Murray and Mrazek are unlikely to be healthy at the same time or the Hawks can buyout Mrazek and play Murray since Kurashev filed for arbitration opening a buyout window. But again...that is all contingent on enough value to taake on 6 million in salary. That is definately 1st rounder value in cost (ask your GM what it cost him to dump Monohan). Niemela develoment took a little step backward last season as opposed to the prior and he is 5'11 which makes him ever being inpactful as a D in the NHL a little longer odds. I would want a 2nd rounder with Niemela to consider taking Murray and could care less if Timmins is involved or if you keep him...Hawks have Seth Jones, Murphy, & Zaitsev as RHD with big contracts this season.
PaulKorea and LivingAnew liked this.
Jul. 6, 2023 at 2:20 p.m.
#25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 455
Likes: 595
Quoting: Sjohns8888
https://puckpedia.com/LTIR22


Thanks for this. Took a quick glance at it... Yikes! I guess this is why teams have capologists! Interesting and complex stuff to me. Gonna have to spend more time on it, truly to understand it.

Cheers
Sjohns8888 liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll