Quoting: Ritzy
Chicago took a 2nd round pick 3 drafts from now for 5M Bailey (3.5M in salary), but no one will take Murray at less than 5M on the cap (6M in salary, check retention) with a first round pick next year?
Oh boy, take the bias blinders off.
Wait did you just compare an overpaid but effective players to Murray and talk sh*t?
You're usually pretty savvy and get why CHI before the buyout window while running a team dominated by youth and lower end contracts would take Bailey and not Murray????
They took a chance on him like Perry hoping they could actually play him. In this even its win win for CHI whether he wants to stay like Perry or got mad and they buy him out.
They still eat up enough cap to just make it over the cap floor while using largely youth pieces.
Eventually people need things as with Seabrook or Weber's contracts deemed unmovable.
Eventually someone needed the relief they offer regardless of how small it is
If you're asserting moving Murray's gonna be cheap and easy then why are the cap strapped leafs sitting on him for the 2nd years now?
You want to debate fine but take your slander on bias ,shine it up real nice ... Turn it sideways and Stick it straight up your Candy A$$.
I got no issue debating in context any topic.
But i will not tolerate ignorance instead of Intelligence.
Bias means i have to care or have a horse in the race.
I dont,cause its a fictional trade between rivals
That and We arent burdened with Murray , just Hoffman
Atleast our guy shows up healthy and ready to put in an effort.
Murray does nothing and makes bank
TeddyLovesTheJets liked this.
Reply
Slafkovsky,
CapFriendly
CapFriendly