SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Retool

Created by: fangm
Team: 2023-24 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 20, 2023
Published: Jul. 20, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$2,250,000
Trades
1.
TOR
  1. Larsson, Adam
  2. Wright, Shane
  3. 2024 1st round pick (SEA)
2.
TOR
  1. Karlsson, Erik ($3,000,000 retained)
SJS
  1. Liljegren, Timothy
  2. Robertson, Nicholas
  3. 2024 1st round pick (TOR)
  4. 2024 3rd round pick (NYI)
3.
TOR
  1. Dostal, Lukas
  2. 2024 2nd round pick (BOS)
ANA
  1. Samsonov, Ilya [RFA Rights]
4.
TOR
  1. 2026 2nd round pick (VAN)
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the SEA
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the OTT
2025
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
2026
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$83,500,000$81,650,116$0$0$1,849,884
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$6,962,366$6,962,366
RW
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,640,250$11,640,250
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,500,000$5,500,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,000,000$11,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Seattle Kraken
$918,333$918,333
C
RFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,000,000$3,000,000
C, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$925,000$925,000
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$800,000$800,000
C, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,100,000$2,100,000
RW, C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
$2,250,000$2,250,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,400,000$2,400,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,350,000$1,350,000
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$775,000$775,000
C
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$7,500,000$7,500,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Seattle Kraken
$4,000,000$4,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$766,667$766,667
G
RFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$7,000,000$7,000,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$812,500$812,500
G
RFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$4,150,000$4,150,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$800,000$800,000
LD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,625,000$5,625,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$4,687,500$4,687,500
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jul. 20, 2023 at 12:49 p.m.
#1
Rip
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2022
Posts: 12,371
Likes: 3,250
Capfriendly, where a 33 year old guy making 11.5 million for several more seasons is worth more than a 26 year old Selke finalist 100 point winger. Yup that makes sense
Fabi liked this.
Jul. 20, 2023 at 12:53 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 4,350
Likes: 1,411
Woeful, but I think you already knew that but posted this drivel anyway 👏
Jul. 20, 2023 at 1:01 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 16,662
Likes: 12,856
Hard pass for Anaheim who just shave Dostal that contract

We have a goalie that could be moved but it isn’t Dostal and the guy who it is has already said no to Toronto so
Jded liked this.
Jul. 20, 2023 at 1:01 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 11,196
Likes: 10,052
Canucks aren’t trading a 2nd for a 4th liner and a #6/7 dman
Warpbox liked this.
Jul. 20, 2023 at 1:03 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 11,196
Likes: 10,052
Quoting: RipNasty
Capfriendly, where a 33 year old guy making 11.5 million for several more seasons is worth more than a 26 year old Selke finalist 100 point winger. Yup that makes sense


In what world is Liljegren, Robertson, a 1st, and a 3rd a better return than Wright, Larsson, and a 1st?

Seattle’s 1st is likely > Toronto’s 1st
Wright >>> Liljegren, Robertson, and the 3rd
Then Larsson on top of that
Warpbox, matthias893 and vikhodush liked this.
Jul. 20, 2023 at 1:22 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 3,319
Likes: 2,302
Quoting: RipNasty
Capfriendly, where a 33 year old guy making 11.5 million for several more seasons is worth more than a 26 year old Selke finalist 100 point winger. Yup that makes sense


Capfriendly, where Timothy Liljegren is worth more then Shane Wright
vikhodush liked this.
Jul. 20, 2023 at 1:26 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2023
Posts: 820
Likes: 326
Seattle doesn't even pick up. Trade would make them a worse team. Does nothing to improve them. They have plenty of scoring (Outscored Toronto) and Larrson is a key cog on the defense.
Quillanrocks liked this.
Jul. 20, 2023 at 2:07 p.m.
#8
Rip
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2022
Posts: 12,371
Likes: 3,250
Quoting: mv21227
In what world is Liljegren, Robertson, a 1st, and a 3rd a better return than Wright, Larsson, and a 1st?

Seattle’s 1st is likely > Toronto’s 1st
Wright >>> Liljegren, Robertson, and the 3rd
Then Larsson on top of that


Larsson isn't very good and Wright has proven nothing. However, Karlsson at full price is about the riskiest investment one can make. And the return for Marner isn't close.
Jul. 20, 2023 at 2:07 p.m.
#9
Rip
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2022
Posts: 12,371
Likes: 3,250
Quoting: Warpbox
Capfriendly, where Timothy Liljegren is worth more then Shane Wright


He isn't but what's Wright worth? He hasn't proven **** yet. Liljegren is good
Jul. 20, 2023 at 2:31 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 11,196
Likes: 10,052
Quoting: RipNasty
Larsson isn't very good and Wright has proven nothing. However, Karlsson at full price is about the riskiest investment one can make. And the return for Marner isn't close.


Larsson is a good top 4 dman. He’d be the Leafs best RHD (unless they get Karlsson), and arguably their best dman overall. Wright is one of the best prospects in hockey. He alone is probably worth more than the package the Leafs are giving up for Karlsson here. When you add in Larsson and the 1st it’s easily a far better package than what the Leafs are giving to SJ. And the Leafs aren’t trading for Karlsson full price, there’s 3M retention (he is still a risky investment though I agree)
Warpbox liked this.
Jul. 20, 2023 at 2:33 p.m.
#11
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 17,618
Likes: 17,643
Quoting: RipNasty
He isn't but what's Wright worth? He hasn't proven **** yet. Liljegren is good


Bedard hasn't proven anything. Clearly Nicholas Robertson >>>>
Warpbox and vikhodush liked this.
Jul. 20, 2023 at 2:49 p.m.
#12
Rip
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2022
Posts: 12,371
Likes: 3,250
Quoting: mv21227
Larsson is a good top 4 dman. He’d be the Leafs best RHD (unless they get Karlsson), and arguably their best dman overall. Wright is one of the best prospects in hockey. He alone is probably worth more than the package the Leafs are giving up for Karlsson here. When you add in Larsson and the 1st it’s easily a far better package than what the Leafs are giving to SJ. And the Leafs aren’t trading for Karlsson full price, there’s 3M retention (he is still a risky investment though I agree)


No he wouldn't be, Brodie is better. Larsson isn't all that good. He never has the puck which is why he hits a lot and blocks a lot of shots but absolutely kills you possession wise. He's not bad to have on your team but he's really not what he's billed as.
Jul. 20, 2023 at 2:50 p.m.
#13
Rip
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2022
Posts: 12,371
Likes: 3,250
Quoting: Juiceman
Bedard hasn't proven anything. Clearly Nicholas Robertson >>>>


Wright dropped from 1st overall for a reason and couldn't make the squad yet. He's overrated and absolutely could fizzle out.
Jul. 20, 2023 at 2:58 p.m.
#14
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 17,618
Likes: 17,643
Quoting: RipNasty
Wright dropped from 1st overall for a reason and couldn't make the squad yet. He's overrated and absolutely could fizzle out.


Every single prospect has potential to fizzle out. 4th overall is still no joke. And just because he couldn't stick in the NHL in the first year, he is suddenly overrated? Literally nobody from his draft class has played in the NHL yet. The only one is Slafkovsky who was terrible. Go tell Habs fans that their recent 1st overall pick is overrated and absolutely could fizzle out
Warpbox liked this.
Jul. 20, 2023 at 3:16 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 3,319
Likes: 2,302
Quoting: RipNasty
He isn't but what's Wright worth? He hasn't proven **** yet. Liljegren is good


He was drafted 4th a singular year ago. Did you say the same thing about Marner when he didn't immediately join the NHL?
Juiceman and vikhodush liked this.
Jul. 20, 2023 at 3:54 p.m.
#16
Rip
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2022
Posts: 12,371
Likes: 3,250
Quoting: Juiceman
Every single prospect has potential to fizzle out. 4th overall is still no joke. And just because he couldn't stick in the NHL in the first year, he is suddenly overrated? Literally nobody from his draft class has played in the NHL yet. The only one is Slafkovsky who was terrible. Go tell Habs fans that their recent 1st overall pick is overrated and absolutely could fizzle out


It was a very weak class.
Jul. 20, 2023 at 3:55 p.m.
#17
Rip
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2022
Posts: 12,371
Likes: 3,250
Quoting: Warpbox
He was drafted 4th a singular year ago. Did you say the same thing about Marner when he didn't immediately join the NHL?


Wright falling to 4th in a weak draft is a lot different than Marner being taken 4th in one of the deepest drafts in the past decade.
Jul. 20, 2023 at 4:23 p.m.
#18
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 17,618
Likes: 17,643
Quoting: RipNasty
It was a very weak class.


Right but that doesn't matter. Saying he is overrated and could fizzle out because he didn't immediately make the NHL makes no sense. Most top players in the NHL took 1 or 2 years after their draft to make the NHL... What is your justification for saying this? It is a terrible argument.
Jul. 20, 2023 at 4:24 p.m.
#19
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 17,618
Likes: 17,643
Quoting: RipNasty
Wright falling to 4th in a weak draft is a lot different than Marner being taken 4th in one of the deepest drafts in the past decade.


You're right. I'd imagine the 4th overall in one of the deepest drafts in the past decade would surely be able to make an immediate impact the year he was drafted. Wait...
Jul. 20, 2023 at 4:44 p.m.
#20
Marner rocks
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 4,409
Likes: 949
Marner isn't going anywhere. Bruce Boudreau when talking about the leafs and the big4 said Marner is the best player of them all. This guy is one of the top 3 RW in the league and possibly the best 2-way winger in the league. This kind of skill is hard to find, Marchand would be the last guy to be in that conversation and he has only one 100 point season.
Jul. 20, 2023 at 5:11 p.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 3,319
Likes: 2,302
Quoting: RipNasty
Wright falling to 4th in a weak draft is a lot different than Marner being taken 4th in one of the deepest drafts in the past decade.


Every 4th overall pick from 2010-2021. Ryan Johansen, Adam Larsson, Griffen Reinhart, Seth Jones, Sam Bennett, Mitch Marner, Jesse Puljurarvi, Cale Makar, Brady Tkachuk, Bowen Byram, Lucas Raymond, Luke Hughes.

Out of those 12 players, there are 2 that are/were less valuable then Liljegren (Reinhart and Puljurarvi) The other 10? All more valuable (at least at their prime) if you think Timothy Liljegren is worth more then Shane Wright you're insane
Jul. 20, 2023 at 5:59 p.m.
#22
Rip
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2022
Posts: 12,371
Likes: 3,250
Quoting: Juiceman
Right but that doesn't matter. Saying he is overrated and could fizzle out because he didn't immediately make the NHL makes no sense. Most top players in the NHL took 1 or 2 years after their draft to make the NHL... What is your justification for saying this? It is a terrible argument.


It's the fact that he slid down, in a weak draft class and hasn't overly impressed since. I don't like his attitude either. Wright's not going to be what people think he's going to be.
Jul. 20, 2023 at 6:00 p.m.
#23
Rip
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2022
Posts: 12,371
Likes: 3,250
Quoting: Warpbox
Every 4th overall pick from 2010-2021. Ryan Johansen, Adam Larsson, Griffen Reinhart, Seth Jones, Sam Bennett, Mitch Marner, Jesse Puljurarvi, Cale Makar, Brady Tkachuk, Bowen Byram, Lucas Raymond, Luke Hughes.

Out of those 12 players, there are 2 that are/were less valuable then Liljegren (Reinhart and Puljurarvi) The other 10? All more valuable (at least at their prime) if you think Timothy Liljegren is worth more then Shane Wright you're insane


Look we both know you hate the Leafs. So anything you say in regards to Liljegren is going to be just nonsensical.
Jul. 20, 2023 at 6:02 p.m.
#24
Rip
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2022
Posts: 12,371
Likes: 3,250
Quoting: Juiceman
You're right. I'd imagine the 4th overall in one of the deepest drafts in the past decade would surely be able to make an immediate impact the year he was drafted. Wait...


That was a Babcock choice. They didn't even give Marner a chance. But as we have discovered, everything you say is going to A) be heavily bias towards the Canucks B) even more heavily biased against the Leafs and C) you make up nonsense rationalizations to make your arguments make sense. Unfortunately it's always bogus and impossible to discuss.
Jul. 20, 2023 at 6:03 p.m.
#25
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 17,618
Likes: 17,643
Quoting: RipNasty
It's the fact that he slid down, in a weak draft class and hasn't overly impressed since. I don't like his attitude either. Wright's not going to be what people think he's going to be.


Draft is unpredictable. Yeah sure maybe his attitude is a problem, but that doesn't make him suddenly overrated and destined to fizzle out. The fact that he was consensus ranked #1 tells you enough of how good he is
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll