SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

The Only EK trade that makes sense

Created by: Pensfan303
Team: 2023-24 Pittsburgh Penguins
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 21, 2023
Published: Jul. 21, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
If the pens get EK, yes it will be a 3 team trade however, the 3rd team WILL NOT be retaining salary on EK and will only be there to take on Jeff Petry. I have seen way to many ACGM having a 3rd team retaining money on EK and it makes no sense.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$775,000
Trades
1.
PIT
  1. Karlsson, Erik ($3,000,000 retained)
Additional Details:
Sharks retain 26% of EK contract, reports are that they want to retain 20% or so, Dubas gets the Sharks to retain a extra 700k.
SJS
  1. Granlund, Mikael
  2. Murashov, Sergei [Reserve List]
  3. Smith, Ty
  4. 2024 1st round pick (PIT)
  5. 2025 3rd round pick (PIT)
Additional Details:
Granlund is money going back. Someone who can play in their top 6 and hopefully for them regain some trade value or be useful haha.

Ty Smith, former 1st round pick, hes a great skater, puck moving OFD who can QB the PP replacing EK, he can play both the left and right side and would give the sharks some much needed offense on the back end after moving EK.

Sergei Murashov, He's looking like a solid goaltending prospect, he did very well in the MHL and in his lone KHL start.

2024 1st, top 5 protected

Now is this a great return, no it isn't. however unless the Sharks retain 50% they won't be getting a kings ransom for EK. To me this is about the return we will see for EK.
2.
PIT
    FC
    CHI
    1. Petry, Jeff
    2. 2025 2nd round pick (PIT)
    Additional Details:
    Petry is obviously the odd man out if EK is going to be a penguin. Chicago makes the most sense to be the 3rd team involved they have cap space and Chicago is close to Petry's home. Chicago can also then flip him at the deadline if they want at 50% in order to gain more assets to build around Bedard.

    Basing the trade around the Cal Petersen and Sean Walker cap dump (7.65mil). (2nd and Grans). To me Petry is better than both players that went to Philly and still holds some value and like I mentioned, Petry can easily be flipped at the deadline to a contender at 50% for even more assets.
    Buyouts
    DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
    2024
    Logo of the PIT
    Logo of the PIT
    Logo of the PIT
    Logo of the PIT
    Logo of the NYR
    2025
    Logo of the PIT
    Logo of the PIT
    Logo of the PIT
    Logo of the PIT
    Logo of the PIT
    2026
    Logo of the PIT
    Logo of the PIT
    Logo of the PIT
    Logo of the PIT
    Logo of the PIT
    Logo of the PIT
    Logo of the PIT
    ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
    23$83,500,000$80,466,842$0$0$3,033,158

    Roster

    Left WingCentreRight Wing
    Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
    $4,500,000$4,500,000
    LW, RW
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
    $8,700,000$8,700,000
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
    $5,000,000$5,000,000
    RW, LW
    M-NTC
    UFA - 5
    Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
    $5,000,000$5,000,000
    LW, RW
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
    $6,100,000$6,100,000
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
    $5,125,000$5,125,000
    RW, LW
    NMC
    UFA - 5
    Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
    $775,000$775,000
    RW, LW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
    $2,450,000$2,450,000
    C
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
    $775,000$775,000
    RW, LW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
    $775,000$775,000
    LW
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
    $2,000,000$2,000,000
    C, RW
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
    $900,000$900,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 2
    Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
    Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
    $4,500,000$4,500,000
    LD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 6
    Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
    $6,100,000$6,100,000
    RD
    NMC
    UFA - 5
    Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
    $5,375,000$5,375,000
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 5
    Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
    $4,025,175$4,025,175
    LD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $7,000,000$7,000,000
    RD
    NMC
    UFA - 4
    Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
    $1,800,000$1,800,000
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
    $825,000$825,000
    LD
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
    $2,750,000$2,750,000
    LD/RD
    UFA - 2
    ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
    Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
    $3,125,000$3,125,000
    RW, C
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
    $800,000$800,000
    RD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
    $800,000$800,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 1
    Taxi Squad
    Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
    $1,500,000$1,500,000 ($350,000$350K$350,000$350K)
    G
    UFA - 1

    Embed Code

    • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
    • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

    Text-Embed

    Click to Highlight
    Jul. 21, 2023 at 5:05 p.m.
    #1
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Oct. 2022
    Posts: 1,508
    Likes: 3,125
    I saw this and braced myself for another EK retention discussion. This does make sense and I think Chicago probably accepts. Based on the amount still owed, they may ask for more but to me this makes sense.
    PaulKorea liked this.
    Jul. 21, 2023 at 5:05 p.m.
    #2
    train, train
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2015
    Posts: 3,016
    Likes: 733
    Blomqvist instead of Murashov and a 2025 1st instead of a 2025 3rd and it's a deal.
    Jul. 21, 2023 at 5:07 p.m.
    #3
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2022
    Posts: 1,464
    Likes: 619
    Quoting: JK74
    I saw this and braced myself for another EK retention discussion. This does make sense and I think Chicago probably accepts. Based on the amount still owed, they may ask for more but to me this makes sense.


    ya I keep seing other ACGM that have a 3rd team retain, to me it would only make sense if EK had 1 or 2 season left on his deal not 4. the 3rd team that will be involved if this trade goes down is just to take on Petry and not to retain on EK
    Jul. 21, 2023 at 5:08 p.m.
    #4
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2022
    Posts: 1,464
    Likes: 619
    Edited Jul. 21, 2023 at 5:23 p.m.
    Quoting: CheechYou
    Blomqvist instead of Murashov and a 2025 1st instead of a 2025 3rd and it's a deal.


    then you can keep EK. I would be willing to switch out Murashov for Blomqvist, however I would not pay nor should any team pay 2 1st for EK unless the sharks are retaining 50% which they have made known that they won't retain that much or even close to that. This is most likely a very similar return to what the Sharks will get for EK. IF/When EK is traded, I got a feeling we will be seing alot of Sharks fans saying it's a under whelming return.
    Jul. 21, 2023 at 5:43 p.m.
    #5
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2023
    Posts: 694
    Likes: 1,094
    Hawks are going to want more than a 2nd to take Petry.
    Hawksguy81 liked this.
    Jul. 21, 2023 at 6:02 p.m.
    #6
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2022
    Posts: 1,464
    Likes: 619
    Quoting: PaulKorea
    Hawks are going to want more than a 2nd to take Petry.


    I doubt it, hes not a negative asset and has some value, pens would just need to clear his cap, See the Taylor Hall trade except here they also get a 2nd
    Jul. 21, 2023 at 6:39 p.m.
    #7
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Sep. 2020
    Posts: 3,294
    Likes: 1,877
    I think PIT is maybe a bit optimistic in having Smith be the "prospect" they give up but this is very reasonable overall. I completely agree that a 3rd team is only going to be involved as a spot for Petry, and it's what Freidman has been reporting the entire time too
    Jul. 21, 2023 at 6:56 p.m.
    #8
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2023
    Posts: 694
    Likes: 1,094
    Quoting: Pensfan303
    I doubt it, hes not a negative asset and has some value, pens would just need to clear his cap, See the Taylor Hall trade except here they also get a 2nd


    They needed a someone to play with Bedard and get to the cap floor. Chicago is over the cap floor now and has no need for Petry. A 2nd isn't enough to take on 12+ million in salary for a player they have no use for.
    Hawksguy81 liked this.
    Jul. 21, 2023 at 7:07 p.m.
    #9
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Nov. 2022
    Posts: 8,566
    Likes: 10,416
    Quoting: Pensfan303
    I doubt it, hes not a negative asset and has some value, pens would just need to clear his cap, See the Taylor Hall trade except here they also get a 2nd


    See the Josh Bailey trade. A 2nd for one year @ $5m cap hit and $3.5m actual salary. And Hawks needed Hall to play w/ Bedard. They don't need a $6m 3rd pair RD. Hawks might be willing to take Petry, but it definitely takes more than a 2nd. Probably another 2nd or a 3rd.
    LivingAnew and Snowhawk18 liked this.
    Jul. 21, 2023 at 7:48 p.m.
    #10
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2019
    Posts: 8,154
    Likes: 3,640
    Quoting: CheechYou
    Blomqvist instead of Murashov and a 2025 1st instead of a 2025 3rd and it's a deal.


    Murashov looks solid and is years younger. I would be just fine with him
    CheechYou liked this.
    Jul. 22, 2023 at 12:44 a.m.
    #11
    Snowhawk
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2022
    Posts: 2,373
    Likes: 3,376
    Quoting: JK74
    I saw this and braced myself for another EK retention discussion. This does make sense and I think Chicago probably accepts. Based on the amount still owed, they may ask for more but to me this makes sense.


    I respectfully disagree, $6.25m for the next two seasons and the $$ payout being the same for Petry means at least one 1st round pick and the equivalent of a second 1st round pick which could be a combination of prospects and picks.

    If the Penguins are willing to take a bad contract back (I.e. last year of Zaitsev) to lessen the cap hit then the price could come down.
    JK74 liked this.
    Jul. 22, 2023 at 6:55 a.m.
    #12
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Oct. 2022
    Posts: 1,508
    Likes: 3,125
    Quoting: Snowhawk18
    I respectfully disagree, $6.25m for the next two seasons and the $$ payout being the same for Petry means at least one 1st round pick and the equivalent of a second 1st round pick which could be a combination of prospects and picks.

    If the Penguins are willing to take a bad contract back (I.e. last year of Zaitsev) to lessen the cap hit then the price could come down.


    I should have also stated that this is dependent on Richardson and Petry's relationship in Montréal. If Richardson feels he's another great locker room guy then it's worth settling for a 2nd. I don't think the amount hurts the Hawks in any way so he could be making $12M but if the net positive is team growth plus draft capital, I make the trade.
    Snowhawk18 liked this.
     
    Reply
    To create a post please Login or Register
    Question:
    Options:
    Add Option
    Submit Poll