SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/NHL Signings

Winnipeg Jets signed Declan Chisholm (1 Year / $775,000 AAV)

Was this a good signing?
The chart has been hidden

Poll Options


Sep. 13 at 12:52 p.m.
#1
Declan Chisholm has signed a new contract with the Winnipeg Jets.
Standard Contract
Comparable ContractsCOMPARE THIS CONTRACT
Length: 1 year
Value: $775,000
Expiry Status: RFA
Cap % Tooltip: 0.93
Signing Team: Logo of the Winnipeg JetsWinnipeg Jets
Signing Date: Sep. 13, 2023
Source: CapFriendly

Declan Chisholm signed a 1 year, $775,000 contract with the Winnipeg Jets on Sep. 13, 2023. The contract has a cap hit of $775,000.

SEASONClauseCap HitTooltipAAV TooltipP. BonusesTooltipS. BonusesTooltipBase SalaryTooltipTotal SalaryTooltipMinors SalTooltip
2023-24$775,000$775,000$0$0$775,000$775,000$90,000
TOTAL$775,000$775,000$0$0$775,000$775,000$90,000
Qualifying OfferTooltip: $813,750
MINIMUM GUARANTEED SALARY: 2023-24: $120,000
Sep. 13 at 1:00 p.m.
#2
Go Jets Go
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 5,200
Likes: 3,849
Really hoping the Jets don’t pull another Kovacevic and lose this guy for nothing. He should be an extra defenceman this year ahead of Capobianco/Stanley.
pinslack, CBA, Wqrrior and 3 others liked this.
Sep. 13 at 1:08 p.m.
#3
Driedger Clan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 1,017
Likes: 214
Rooting for the kid. One of the Jets top D prospects and sure to play some games in the NHL this season which will get him a better contract after this season
Sep. 13 at 1:19 p.m.
#4
and proud of it
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2023
Posts: 1,266
Likes: 697
Nothing wrong with league min signings
Chabotrrorr liked this.
Sep. 13 at 1:52 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2023
Posts: 667
Likes: 224
Quoting: Rooney
Really hoping the Jets don’t pull another Kovacevic and lose this guy for nothing. He should be an extra defenceman this year ahead of Capobianco/Stanley.


I really don’t get why they waived Kovacevic but kept Capobianco
Sep. 13 at 2:05 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 926
Likes: 646
This is a good signing, even if he doesn't play a single NHL game. They are good in the AHL and should provide some competition at training camp this year.
Aebexz liked this.
Sep. 13 at 2:19 p.m.
#7
Go Jets Go
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 5,200
Likes: 3,849
Quoting: CBA
I really don’t get why they waived Kovacevic but kept Capobianco


You and me both, made zero sense at the time and especially not now after seeing how Kovacevic performed in MTL this year. I was so mad when they waived him. What's the point of developing these players just to lose them for nothing? Chisholm should be up all year in my opinion.
CBA and Aebexz liked this.
Sep. 14 at 8:16 a.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 872
Likes: 455
Quoting: Rooney
You and me both, made zero sense at the time and especially not now after seeing how Kovacevic performed in MTL this year. I was so mad when they waived him. What's the point of developing these players just to lose them for nothing? Chisholm should be up all year in my opinion.


Nobody likes it when their team loses a prospect for nothing, but a lot of teams unfortunately don’t have room on the NHL roster for what I’m going to call aging prospects (guys who are no longer waivers exempt but may still have some upside), so they have to make a tough decision. The other option is to try to trade him so they can at least get something for him, but it’s probably a mid-round draft pick at best, and then he’s gone, whereas if they waive him, there’s a chance he could clear and then they can continue to let him develop in their system.

I don’t know how much teams care about how good their AHL teams are, and whether losing a guy who they think is a good AHL player but not good enough for the NHL would bother them, but the system is geared toward developing players for the NHL. The waivers rule gives a team 3-5 years to let a player develop, but prevents them from holding him back indefinitely after that if he’s good enough to play on another NHL team, which to me seems fair for both the player and the team. If you still don't have a spot for the guy after that time, the decent thing to do is give him a chance somewhere else. A lot of them end up getting waived again and never really make it, but some waivers claims have gone on to have pretty good NHL careers.
Rooney and RawDeal liked this.
Sep. 14 at 8:57 a.m.
#9
cautious optimism
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2021
Posts: 2,988
Likes: 5,741
oh no now the "Unsigned RFAs" section on the front page is gonna be slightly shorter than the other two and it's gonna look weird

In all seriousness, i would think he gets quite a few NHL reps this year. His stats with the Moose look pretty solid.
Rooney, RawDeal and Chabotrrorr liked this.
Sep. 14 at 9:52 a.m.
#10
Go Jets Go
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 5,200
Likes: 3,849
Quoting: jr400
Nobody likes it when their team loses a prospect for nothing, but a lot of teams unfortunately don’t have room on the NHL roster for what I’m going to call aging prospects (guys who are no longer waivers exempt but may still have some upside), so they have to make a tough decision. The other option is to try to trade him so they can at least get something for him, but it’s probably a mid-round draft pick at best, and then he’s gone, whereas if they waive him, there’s a chance he could clear and then they can continue to let him develop in their system.

I don’t know how much teams care about how good their AHL teams are, and whether losing a guy who they think is a good AHL player but not good enough for the NHL would bother them, but the system is geared toward developing players for the NHL. The waivers rule gives a team 3-5 years to let a player develop, but prevents them from holding him back indefinitely after that if he’s good enough to play on another NHL team, which to me seems fair for both the player and the team. If you still don't have a spot for the guy after that time, the decent thing to do is give him a chance somewhere else. A lot of them end up getting waived again and never really make it, but some waivers claims have gone on to have pretty good NHL careers.


Very solid analysis my friend, and good point! It's just frustrating to lose a player who you've drafted and developed, even if it's because there is no room on the roster. Especially if they have NHL upside.
Sep. 14 at 1:06 p.m.
#11
why
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 4,049
Likes: 1,371
League minimum, why not.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Loading animation
Submit Poll Edit