SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Price out and bold predictions out of camp

Created by: Campabee
Team: 2023-24 Montreal Canadiens
Initial Creation Date: Sep. 14, 2023
Published: Sep. 15, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Line 1 pure scoring
Line 2 speed, skill and forchecking
Line 3 tenacious in your face hockey (Tatar-Danault-Gallagher esk)
Line 4 more tenacious in your face hockey with defensive abilities as well.
Trades
1.
MTL
  1. 2024 3rd round pick (TBL)
TBL
  1. Price, Carey
Additional Details:
Tampa is always in the market for LTIR contracts, could also be Vegas or Edmonton
2.
MTL
ANA
  1. Armia, Joel
  2. DeSmith, Casey
  3. Dvorak, Christian
  4. Evans, Jake
  5. Savard, David
Additional Details:
Traded for picks and prospects, Anaheim used solely as a placeholder team as they are the first team in the list.
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the WSH
2025
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the DET
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
2026
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$83,500,000$63,835,416$1,170,000$5,372,500$19,664,584
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$7,850,000$7,850,000
LW, RW
UFA - 8
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$7,875,000$7,875,000
C
UFA - 7
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$835,000$835,000 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
LW, RW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$2,900,000$2,900,000
LW, C
RFA - 4
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,362,500$3,362,500
C, RW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$5,500,000$5,500,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$950,000$950,000 (Performance Bonus$3,500,000$4M)
RW, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,985,000$1,985,000 (Performance Bonus$15,000$15K)
C, LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$6,500,000$6,500,000
RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,100,000$1,100,000
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$885,000$885,000 (Performance Bonus$80,000$80K)
C
RFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$775,000$775,000
RW, LW
RFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$4,875,000$4,875,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$950,000$950,000 (Performance Bonus$1,000,000$1M)
RD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,000,000$1,000,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$420,000$420K)
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$275,000$275K)
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,850,000$3,850,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$828,333$828,333
LD/RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,400,000$1,400,000
LD/RD
RFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$766,667$766,667
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$812,500$812,500
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$950,000$950,000
RD
RFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Sep. 15 at 12:47 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 114
Likes: 63
I like how you make it seem as if the Canadians are one of the best teams in hockey. Made me laugh. Anyway, your defense is pure rookies and your goaltending is a sad sight to see. Good news is you’ll get a top ten pick! I think you’ll still beat out the Flyers though!
Sep. 15 at 12:53 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 5,891
Likes: 2,169
Hell no TB doesn't have to deal with that bull**** after this year send an unprotected 1st next year maybe they consider it
Hawksguy81 liked this.
Sep. 15 at 12:56 p.m.
#3
we miss leo k
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 5,694
Likes: 4,868
I like the top 9; I think it's more likely that Armia/Dvorak/Evans stick with the team for at least one more year. The only teams that have cap space available to grab those guys also happen to be teams that aren't looking for veteran depth guys. I'd stick Armia/Evans in where RHP/Beck are on the 4th line and Dvorak...somewhere in there. Hell, make Ylonen the 13th forward and have Dvo be your 4th line RW, who cares.

I'd keep Savard on the team for the time being too, if only to be a veteran presence for the glut of young d-men in the org. Provided he stays healthy, he'll be a great trade chip in 2024-25 as a veteran D with a Cup under his belt, and you'll get a good return for him.

Casey DeSmith will probably pass through waivers if you can't find a taker, but I think he's the first guy out the door if any goalie gets hurt in the preseason. Interesting to see what happens with him, honestly, because Montembault should clearly be the starter and Jake Allen is going to be more difficult to move at this point.
Sep. 15 at 12:57 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 5,891
Likes: 2,169
No one is sending assets for the honor of saving Montreal ownership the uninsured portion of Prices contract. No matter what team it is unless your taking back substantial liabilities they're not considering it. You certainly aren't getting assets. Clearly your either clueless on how LTIR works or this is a complete troll job.
Sep. 15 at 12:57 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 3,182
Likes: 2,887
There's no incentive for a team to give up pick for an LTIR contract. You'd have to take a bad contract in return as well. Not sure who that could be at the moment.
Hawksguy81 liked this.
Sep. 15 at 1:01 p.m.
#6
we miss leo k
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 5,694
Likes: 4,868
Quoting: Boltsbeathabs
Hell no TB doesn't have to deal with that bull**** after this year send an unprotected 1st next year maybe they consider it


I'm curious to see how it all plays out with the Lightning. CF has them with 16 guys under contract for 2024-25 and about $12.4M in space available - but Steve Stamkos is going to need a new deal. Beyond him, most of the core is locked up, but even if you lowball Stamkos at an $8M AAV, there's only 10 forwards and 5 D under contract and $4.4M left to fill out the margins - if you want to have any healthy scratches, you're basically looking at 5/6 guys making league minimum.

Price's deal expires after 2025-26, so it would be kicking the LTIR can two more years down the line - and would give a little more wiggle room in adding useful NHL players to the roster while the team's window is still open.
Campabee liked this.
Sep. 15 at 1:05 p.m.
#7
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 14,011
Likes: 5,561
Quoting: FlyOrDie20
I like how you make it seem as if the Canadians are one of the best teams in hockey. Made me laugh. Anyway, your defense is pure rookies and your goaltending is a sad sight to see. Good news is you’ll get a top ten pick! I think you’ll still beat out the Flyers though!


How did I make it seem like this was a top team, I just laid out how those lines will play. This team was designed with the idea that more rookies/young guys will make the lineup and moving out some vets in the process. Monty will get 40-50 games this year and continue his solid development but you are right we will still be a bottom 10 team and that's the point of moving out the vets and Price's contract. If we were going to compete we would be keeping Price for his LTIR relief as well as guys like Dvo and Savard to push for the playoffs.

Quoting: Boltsbeathabs
Hell no TB doesn't have to deal with that bull**** after this year send an unprotected 1st next year maybe they consider it


Just like we had to include 3 1sts and some top prospects to move Weber or Chairot right?! Jeesh, why do you even bother commenting if you are just going to ignore past trades?! LTIR contracts don't require any compensation, contending teams find them valuable to allow for them to add more important peices to help win championships (you would think a Lightening fan would graps that concept)
MontysPython liked this.
Sep. 15 at 1:06 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 5,891
Likes: 2,169
Quoting: dannibalcorpse
I'm curious to see how it all plays out with the Lightning. CF has them with 16 guys under contract for 2024-25 and about $12.4M in space available - but Steve Stamkos is going to need a new deal. Beyond him, most of the core is locked up, but even if you lowball Stamkos at an $8M AAV, there's only 10 forwards and 5 D under contract and $4.4M left to fill out the margins - if you want to have any healthy scratches, you're basically looking at 5/6 guys making league minimum.

Price's deal expires after 2025-26, so it would be kicking the LTIR can two more years down the line - and would give a little more wiggle room in adding useful NHL players to the roster while the team's window is still open.


How does adding an LTIR contract when you don't have to help ? IT DOESN'T!!!!! IT DOESN'T ALLOW YOU TO ACCRUE CAP SPACE FOR TDL ACQUISITIONS!!!!!!!! There is zero benefit to using LTIR if you don't have to.
Sep. 15 at 1:09 p.m.
#9
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 14,011
Likes: 5,561
Quoting: Boltsbeathabs
No one is sending assets for the honor of saving Montreal ownership the uninsured portion of Prices contract. No matter what team it is unless your taking back substantial liabilities they're not considering it. You certainly aren't getting assets. Clearly your either clueless on how LTIR works or this is a complete troll job.


Price's contract is almost fully insured, moreso than Webers was when he was traded
Sep. 15 at 1:10 p.m.
#10
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 14,011
Likes: 5,561
Quoting: Boltsbeathabs
How does adding an LTIR contract when you don't have to help ? IT DOESN'T!!!!! IT DOESN'T ALLOW YOU TO ACCRUE CAP SPACE FOR TDL ACQUISITIONS!!!!!!!! There is zero benefit to using LTIR if you don't have to.


Except to go 18 mil over the hard cap to win a cup!!!
Sep. 15 at 1:10 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 5,891
Likes: 2,169
Quoting: Campabee
How did I make it seem like this was a top team, I just laid out how those lines will play. This team was designed with the idea that more rookies/young guys will make the lineup and moving out some vets in the process. Monty will get 40-50 games this year and continue his solid development but you are right we will still be a bottom 10 team and that's the point of moving out the vets and Price's contract. If we were going to compete we would be keeping Price for his LTIR relief as well as guys like Dvo and Savard to push for the playoffs.



Just like we had to include 3 1sts and some top prospects to move Weber or Chairot right?! Jeesh, why do you even bother commenting if you are just going to ignore past trades?! LTIR contracts don't require any compensation, contending teams find them valuable to allow for them to add more important peices to gelp win championships (you would think a Lightening fan would graps that concept)


Only if they are dumping other liabilities take Tampa acquiring Seabrook TB desperately needed to dump Johnson's contract so it cost them a 2 Johnson and taking And paying the uninsured portion of his contract ( insurance policies I believe max at 80%
So if you're going to ignore pertaiant historical precedent please don't comment!!!
Sep. 15 at 1:12 p.m.
#12
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 14,011
Likes: 5,561
Quoting: Boltsbeathabs
Only if they are dumping other liabilities take Tampa acquiring Seabrook TB desperately needed to dump Johnson's contract so it cost them a 2 Johnson and taking And paying the uninsured portion of his contract ( insurance policies I believe max at 80%
So if you're going to ignore pertaiant historical precedent please don't comment!!!


Weber's contract got a 4th cause Vegas wanted to exceed the cap for a cup run, same principle.
Sep. 15 at 1:14 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 5,891
Likes: 2,169
Quoting: Campabee
Except to go 18 mil over the hard cap to win a cup!!!


Because clueless we had A 9.5 million dollar LTIR case already . So in order to open more cap space they saved Mellnyk 3 million dollars in uninsured salary but go on with your completely in accurate delusional beliefs on how LTIR WORK !! 18 MILLION OVER THE CAP CRY OF THE LIFE SER!
AnonymousSensFan liked this.
Sep. 15 at 1:16 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 5,891
Likes: 2,169
Edited Sep. 15 at 1:25 p.m.
Quoting: Campabee
Weber's contract got a 4th cause Vegas wanted to exceed the cap for a cup run, same principle.


But they again were already using LTIR IF A TEAM ISN'T and doesn't have to like TB shouldn't have to after this season there is no good reason to add an LTIR CONTRACT FROM ANOTHER TEAM PERIOD FULL STOP!
BTW You're Full of S*** Weber got Montreal a 4th it got them Dadonov

https://www.capfriendly.com/trades/players/shea-weber.
Because VGK was getting rid of a 5.5 million dollar liability in their eyes.
AnonymousSensFan liked this.
Sep. 15 at 1:23 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 353
Likes: 272
OP has a fundamental misunderstanding of how LTIR works.

It's not a "the players cap hit disappears and you get to exceed cap by that amount". You don't get to double dip on cap relief.

Yes, you get to exceed the cap when a player is on LTIR. But only up to that players salary, while also counting that players salary. The cap relief is being able to exceed the cap. Player still counts
Sep. 15 at 1:24 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 3,182
Likes: 2,887
Quoting: Campabee
Weber's contract got a 4th cause Vegas wanted to exceed the cap for a cup run, same principle.


Weber was moved for Dadonov, right? Vegas got a contract off the books. That was the incentive. Just getting a guy to put on LTIR doesn't provide a benefit.
Sep. 15 at 1:27 p.m.
#17
we miss leo k
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 5,694
Likes: 4,868
Quoting: Boltsbeathabs
How does adding an LTIR contract when you don't have to help ? IT DOESN'T!!!!! IT DOESN'T ALLOW YOU TO ACCRUE CAP SPACE FOR TDL ACQUISITIONS!!!!!!!! There is zero benefit to using LTIR if you don't have to.


Eh, you're not wrong. 10 minutes of noodling around on CF and Tampa is going to be tight to the cap with a 22-man roster in 2024-25 whether or not you have Price on LTIR. ETA: It really only works if TB sends something back, and there's nothing on their current roster that would justify getting dumped like that.

If there's some arcane way to make it work, though, I'm sure that JBB is aware of it, and then I think it's still worthwhile. But at this point it doesn't really give them any advantage, and even if it's only $2M of deadline cap space, it'll still wind up more valuable.
Sep. 15 at 1:46 p.m.
#18
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 14,011
Likes: 5,561
Quoting: AnonymousSensFan
OP has a fundamental misunderstanding of how LTIR works.

It's not a "the players cap hit disappears and you get to exceed cap by that amount". You don't get to double dip on cap relief.

Yes, you get to exceed the cap when a player is on LTIR. But only up to that players salary, while also counting that players salary. The cap relief is being able to exceed the cap. Player still counts


I never said his cap hit disappears, I said it allows them to exceed the cap, huge distinction there. Also never said the trade had to be made right now or that it had to be Tampa, I distinctly remember adding the description that it could be Vegas or Edmonton as well, I just kind of assumed people would be smart enough to figure out it was any contender wanting to add whomever had LTIR money already invested through out the season but I guess they weren't and I will have to explain everything like I am talking to 2 year Olds from now on.

Anyway, if Tampa fans want to bi*** about taking on a contract to help them stay in contention, then they can just watch their stars walk away and become bottom feeders for the next few years. JBB would absolutely take on the Price contract if it meant he could resign Stamkos and prolong their window.
Sep. 15 at 1:49 p.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 10,031
Likes: 4,080
The delusion that MTL fans think price who came out to say he’s never playing again is still worth a 3rd! The only reason teams took on LTIR was with a bad contract going back, this is beyond silly. Yes insurance pays 90% of his deal but that still leaves whoever has him on the hook for 3.25 million over the next 3 years. Only teams that do this deal are basement dwellers looking to hit cap floor and MTL adds a 3rd not gets a 3rd in this instance.
Boltsbeathabs liked this.
Sep. 15 at 2:06 p.m.
#20
On the Rod Meal Plan
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 166
Likes: 86
Quoting: Campabee
I never said his cap hit disappears, I said it allows them to exceed the cap, huge distinction there. Also never said the trade had to be made right now or that it had to be Tampa, I distinctly remember adding the description that it could be Vegas or Edmonton as well, I just kind of assumed people would be smart enough to figure out it was any contender wanting to add whomever had LTIR money already invested through out the season but I guess they weren't and I will have to explain everything like I am talking to 2 year Olds from now on.

Anyway, if Tampa fans want to bi*** about taking on a contract to help them stay in contention, then they can just watch their stars walk away and become bottom feeders for the next few years. JBB would absolutely take on the Price contract if it meant he could resign Stamkos and prolong their window.


How does adding an LTIR contract (that is not already on their books) allow a team to exceed the cap?

If a team has a total cap hit of 80MM, the salary cap is 81MM, and they take on a 5MM LTIR contract then their cap hit is now 85MM but they receive 5MM in cap relief leaving... an effective cap of 80MM, right where the started. The only difference is that the team loses out on cap accrual because you can only accrue salary throughout the season if your total team salary without relief is below the cap.
Anus_McLeod and Boltsbeathabs liked this.
Sep. 15 at 2:17 p.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 3,182
Likes: 2,887
Quoting: Huge_Caniac_Abe_Lincoln
How does adding an LTIR contract (that is not already on their books) allow a team to exceed the cap?

If a team has a total cap hit of 80MM, the salary cap is 81MM, and they take on a 5MM LTIR contract then their cap hit is now 85MM but they receive 5MM in cap relief leaving... an effective cap of 80MM, right where the started. The only difference is that the team loses out on cap accrual because you can only accrue salary throughout the season if your total team salary without relief is below the cap.


Pretty close. The team would actually have a little less cap to play with though. This is because the cap relief would be calculated as the amount over the normal cap limit. They'd actually be in worse shape in the latter scenario. It's why teams get their roster as close as possible to the cap before using LTIR.
Sep. 15 at 2:35 p.m.
#22
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 5,891
Likes: 2,169
Quoting: Campabee
I never said his cap hit disappears, I said it allows them to exceed the cap, huge distinction there. Also never said the trade had to be made right now or that it had to be Tampa, I distinctly remember adding the description that it could be Vegas or Edmonton as well, I just kind of assumed people would be smart enough to figure out it was any contender wanting to add whomever had LTIR money already invested through out the season but I guess they weren't and I will have to explain everything like I am talking to 2 year Olds from now on.

Anyway, if Tampa fans want to bi*** about taking on a contract to help them stay in contention, then they can just watch their stars walk away and become bottom feeders for the next few years. JBB would absolutely take on the Price contract if it meant he could resign Stamkos and prolong their window.


You truly don't understand how LTIR works. There is NO scenario you are better off with an LTIR Contract than without one given the rest of it is the same taking on prices LTIR DOESN'T GIVE ANY TEAM "EXTRA SALARY CAP.
Sep. 15 at 2:35 p.m.
#23
On the Rod Meal Plan
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 166
Likes: 86
Quoting: Anus_McLeod
Pretty close. The team would actually have a little less cap to play with though. This is because the cap relief would be calculated as the amount over the normal cap limit. They'd actually be in worse shape in the latter scenario. It's why teams get their roster as close as possible to the cap before using LTIR.


Gotcha, I misunderstood that. Thanks for clearing it up!
Anus_McLeod and Boltsbeathabs liked this.
Sep. 15 at 2:49 p.m.
#24
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 3,182
Likes: 2,887
Quoting: Huge_Caniac_Abe_Lincoln
Gotcha, I misunderstood that. Thanks for clearing it up!


I've been trying to understand LTIR for years now and think I'm finally pretty close. I think they could have made it simpler, but lawyers gonna be lawyers.
Boltsbeathabs liked this.
Sep. 15 at 4:51 p.m.
#25
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 5,891
Likes: 2,169
Quoting: Anus_McLeod
Weber was moved for Dadonov, right? Vegas got a contract off the books. That was the incentive. Just getting a guy to put on LTIR doesn't provide a benefit.

Exactly VGK saw Dadonov asa5.5 million dollar liability they shed opening that in cap space not Weber's hit.
Anus_McLeod liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll