SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Tell how bad of a idea this is

Created by: RavensShadow
Team: 2023-24 Boston Bruins
Initial Creation Date: Sep. 28, 2023
Published: Sep. 28, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Boston gives a little to get a little, with not much room to play with. Ulmark might work with a third team involved. Or what would you add.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
5$7,000,000
Trades
1.
BOS
  1. Zegras, Trevor [RFA Rights]
Additional Details:
Boston gets a top center
ANA
  1. Grzelcyk, Matt
  2. Swayman, Jeremy
Additional Details:
The Ducks get a goalie they can control or trade later
2.
BOS
  1. Luukkonen, Ukko-Pekka
Additional Details:
Just a example
BUF
  1. 2024 4th round pick (BOS)
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2025
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2026
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$83,500,000$83,745,834$4,500,000$500,000-$245,834
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,125,000$6,125,000
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
$7,000,000$7,000,000
C, LW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$11,250,000$11,250,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,000,000$1,000,000 (Performance Bonus$500,000$500K)
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,750,000$4,750,000
C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,000,000$4,000,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,300,000$2,300,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$5,250,000$5,250,000
C, RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$762,500$762,500
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,000,000$2,000,000
C, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$800,000$800,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$775,000$775,000
C, LW
RFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,500,000$6,500,000
LD
NTC, NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$9,500,000$9,500,000
RD
UFA - 7
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,100,000$4,100,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$837,500$837,500
G
RFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,137,500$1,137,500
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,050,000$1,050,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$775,000$775,000
RD
RFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Sep. 28, 2023 at 9:17 a.m.
#1
LBS
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2023
Posts: 1,518
Likes: 559
If Boston can succesfully fleece two teams, they should jump at the opportunity.
ANA has Gibson and Dostal, no real need for a goalie.
BUF could trade UPL but, he's at least worth a 3rd and they have a 3way goaltending battle going on, UPL could be the best one for this coming year, why trade him now?
RavensShadow, tupty, aedoran and 1 other person liked this.
Sep. 28, 2023 at 9:47 a.m.
#2
Pop Pop
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 14,608
Likes: 8,277
It's a great idea but it's not enough to get Zegras
RavensShadow, aedoran and OldNYIfan liked this.
Sep. 28, 2023 at 10:26 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2017
Posts: 8,262
Likes: 6,242
Can't imagine Anaheim is doing that. Might be selling low on upl, but it's not crazy low. Probably would need a stable option behind Levi before upl gets moved.
aedoran, RavensShadow, OldNYIfan and 1 other person liked this.
Sep. 28, 2023 at 10:32 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 19,811
Likes: 8,846
For the Ducks it’s a terrible idea. Add a 1st they still decline.

FYI - Boston does not need a goalie if they trade one.
RavensShadow, OldNYIfan, gretzkyghosts and 1 other person liked this.
Sep. 28, 2023 at 10:53 a.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 523
Likes: 377
Quoting: Gofnut999
For the Ducks it’s a terrible idea. Add a 1st they still decline.

FYI - Boston does not need a goalie if they trade one.


This was the first draft, I think a 3 way with Buffalo being the third team might work. They have the young talent and Boston have parts Buffalo could use.
gretzkyghosts liked this.
Sep. 29, 2023 at 7:36 a.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2016
Posts: 279
Likes: 39
Quoting: lowblocksniper
If Boston can successful fleece two teams, they should jump at the opportunity.
ANA has Gibson and Dostal, no real need for a goalie.
BUF could trade UPL but, he's at least worth a 3rd and they have a 3way goaltending battle going on, UPL could be the best one for this coming year, why trade him now?



Gibson has been terrible the last two years, His GAA was 3.99 last year. It's a big contract but he's not a top guy now. I think him being the 35% behind a top goalie's 65% would be better for Anaheim, with that said, B's aren't trading Swayman, if they ship a goalie it'll be Ully.
gretzkyghosts liked this.
Sep. 29, 2023 at 7:38 a.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2016
Posts: 279
Likes: 39
Zegras is only looking for $5M on a 2-3 year contract. 100% if they could swing a trade they should just give him the $5M over 3. He'd still be an RFA at the end of that and they could offrer sheet him and either work something out or if someone comes in to snipe him get significant compensation by letting him go.
RavensShadow and gretzkyghosts liked this.
Sep. 29, 2023 at 7:42 a.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2016
Posts: 279
Likes: 39
Quoting: Gofnut999
For the Ducks it’s a terrible idea. Add a 1st they still decline.

FYI - Boston does not need a goalie if they trade one.


No **** right. Bussi easily fills the back up role going forward and Kyser and Dipeitro are more than serviceable. Plus they also have Svedeback who had an incredible year at Providence College. The goalie depth in this system is ridiculous.
Sep. 29, 2023 at 8:58 a.m.
#9
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 523
Likes: 377
Quoting: DLussier
Gibson has been terrible the last two years, His GAA was 3.99 last year. It's a big contract but he's not a top guy now. I think him being the 35% behind a top goalie's 65% would be better for Anaheim, with that said, B's aren't trading Swayman, if they ship a goalie it'll be Ully.


The biggest problem with Ulmark is his M-NTC. If they move him it's just another obstacle. Swayman has more value and is easier to move. Boston only has a handful of players they can move. Most are older and or on a M-NTC so it makes things difficult for them.
gretzkyghosts liked this.
Sep. 29, 2023 at 9:02 a.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2016
Posts: 279
Likes: 39
Quoting: RavensShadow
The biggest problem with Ulmark is his M-NTC. If they move him it's just another obstacle. Swayman has more value and is easier to move. Boston only has a handful of players they can move. Most are older and or on a M-NTC so it makes things difficult for them.


Ullmarks M-NTC is only 15 teams and realistically if you are trading him to a contending team, I doubt he will put up a fuss. Especially considering if he doesn;t want to approve it he becomes the 30% of the 70/30 split
RavensShadow and gretzkyghosts liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll