SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

The type of dman we need

Created by: NHLfan10506
Team: 2023-24 New Jersey Devils
Initial Creation Date: Nov. 9, 2023
Published: Nov. 11, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Our regular 6 today…

Siegenthaler -- Hamilton
Bahl -- Marino
Smith -- Hughes

If we had one more year of Graves and Severson…

Siegenthaler -- Hamilton
Graves -- Marino
Hughes -- Severson

So it’s basically been a drop from Graves and Severson to Bahl and Smith. Bahl is good defensively in our own zone, but has been mediocre moving the puck. Smith does little well. And his passing out of d-zone has been brutal. Our whole system is based on possession through all three zones, but if we cannot move the puck successfully out of our defensive area to our puck carriers, we are muted our own strength.

As a result, NJD 5v5 game has suffered. We are getting fewer successful d-zone exits, fewer o-zone entries, few scoring chances, and less possession, which in turn has created more scoring chances allowed. Our goaltending can hang when we have the puck 60% if the time…but not when we are splitting chances with opponents.

Our 5v5 play has suffered due to the quality of chances. Look at these comparisons from last year.

Changes in 5v5 from last season (NHL rank last year vs this year)

- Shot attempts for: from 4th to 7th
- Shot attempts against: from 7th to 5th
- Unblocked shot attempts for: from 5th to 7th
- Unblocked shot attempts against: from 5th to 9th
- Scoring chances for: from 1st to 1st
- Scoring chances against: from 4th to 3rd
- High danger scoring chances for: from 3rd to 4th
- % of chances that are high danger: from 12th to 27th
- High danger scoring chances against: from 1st to 11th
- % if chances allowed that are high danger: from 3rd to 25th

While much play has been similar, the results have not been....
- Expected goals for %: from 2nd to 9th
- Goals For %: from 4th to 27th (!!!!!)

There are some shooting woes, but better quality chances will improve
- Shooting %: from 16th to 27th
- Shooting % on all attempts: from 14th to 29th
- Shooting % on unblocked shots: from 20th to 27th
- % of unblocked shots that miss net: from 14th to 25th
- % if shot attempts that are blocked: from 23rd to 26th
- High danger shooting %: from 19th to 16th
- Medium danger shooting %: from 23rd to 28th
- Low danger shooting %: from 13th to 24th

And goaltending will improve with fewer quality chances against
- Save %: from 13th to 26th
- Save % on all attempts: from 14th to 26th
- Save % on unblocked shots: from 11th to 29th
- High danger save %: from 26th to 31st
- Medium danger save %: from 12th to 26th
- Low danger save %: from 15th to 14th

Our struggles 5v5 are from the quality of 5v5 chances...
- % of scoring chances for that are high-quality: from 12th to 27th (!)
- % of scoring chances against that are high-quality: from 3rd to 25th (!!!!)

In short, we need better possession coming from back end.

GF% (NHL rank)
- Hamilton 42% (112th)
- Siegenthaler 38% (126th)
- Bahl 44% (106th)
- Marino 44% (100th)
- Hughes 43% (108th)
- Smith 27% (148th....or 6th worst)

xGF% (NHL rank)
- Hamilton 62% (3rd)
- Siegenthaler 58% (14th)
- Bahl 51% (73rd)
- Marino 51% (71st)
- Hughes 53% (63rd)
- Smith 39% (148th...or 6th worst)

High Danger chances % (NHL rank)
- Hamilton 65% (3rd)
- Siegenthaler 62% (11th)
- Bahl 49% (93rd)
- Marino 55% (50th)
- Hughes 54% (53rd)
- Smith 44% (123rd)

High Danger goals % (NHL rank)
- Hamilton 50% (71st)
- Siegenthaler 38% (114th)
- Bahl 42% (106th)
- Marino 43% (98th)
- Hughes 50% (77th)
- Smith 17% (149th...or 5th worst)

% of chances for that are high-danger
- Hamilton 41%
- Siegenthaler 42%
- Bahl 36%
- Marino 40%
- Hughes 34%
- Smith 36%


When Severson was on ice last year, his per 60 rates led team in highest high-danger chances for, lowest chances allowed, highest chances %, highest goals for % and highest expected goals for %. He was central to our possession game and created more opportunities to score and limited opportunities allowed.

I do not think NJD needs to find a dmen to increase our hits per game. First, hits are highly correlated with possession. Teams that hit more hold onto the puck less. Second, we were 29th in hits/60 last year but are 19th this year. Most of that gain has come from more hits/60 from forwards. But we are also getting hit much less as we don't control puck as much (clean hits vs dirty hits is a separate matter).

Based on 5v5 play, with aim to improve better quality of chances, improve possession and get cleaner zone exits and entries (in effect come closest to replicating what Severson did well), I have ranked the best "rental" (UFA 2024) dmen for NJD based on those categories. Agnostic to lefty-righty since we have a couple of guys who can play both sides.

1. Noah Hanifin (CGY)
2. Chris Tanev (CGY)
3. Alexandre Carrier (NSH)
4. Gustav Forsling (FLA)
5. Brenden Dillon (WPG)
6. Oliver Ekman-Larsson (FLA)
7. Justin Schultz (SEA)
8. Nick Seeler (PHI)
9. Dylan DeMelo (WPG)
10. Matt Roy (LAK)
11. Sean Walker (LAK)
12. Dmitry Kulikov (FLA)
13. Brady Skjei (CAR)
14. Kevin Shattenkirk (BOS)
15. Ty Barrie (NSH)
16. Ilya Lyubushkin (ANA)
17. Tyler Myers (VAN)
18. Matt Dumba (ARI)
19. Tony DeAngelo (CAR)
20. Troy Stecher (ARI)
21. Alec Martinez (LAK)
22. Shayne Gostisbehere (DET)
23. John Klingberg (TOR)
24. Nikita Zadorov (CGY)
25. Mark Giordano (TOR)
26. Ian Cole (VAN)
27. Brendan Smith (NJD)
28. Jani Hakanpaa (DAL)
29. Dakota Mermis (MIN)


If you filter out all players on playoff teams (and those worse than Smith), I believe these would be best fits for NJD

1. Noah Hanifin (CGY)
2. Chris Tanev (CGY)
3. Alexandre Carrier (NSH)
7. Justin Schultz (SEA)
8. Nick Seeler (PHI)

(Cody Ceci and Marcus Pettersson among 2-year rentals)

At the end of the day, it may just be Miller.

And please....don't bother with "a guy who hits"
Trades
1.
2.
3.
4.
Buyouts
Recapture Fees
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the COL
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NSH
2025
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
2026
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
21$83,500,000$77,611,667$422,500$2,232,500$5,888,333
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$2,125,000$2,125,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$8,000,000$8,000,000
C
UFA - 7
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$8,800,000$8,800,000
LW, RW
UFA - 8
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$7,250,000$7,250,000
C
UFA - 4
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$7,875,000$7,875,000
RW, LW
UFA - 8
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$3,150,000$3,150,000
C, LW
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$400,000$400K)
RW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$1,400,000$1,400,000
C
RFA - 1
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$1,350,000$1,350,000
RW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$3,400,000$3,400,000
LD
UFA - 5
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$9,000,000$9,000,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$3,400,000$3,400,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$925,000$925K)
LD/RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$4,400,000$4,400,000
RD
UFA - 4
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$850,833$850,833 (Performance Bonus$57,500$58K)
G
RFA - 1
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$1,050,000$1,050,000
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$1,850,000$1,850,000
RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW, C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,237,500$1,237,500
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$775,000$775,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Seattle Kraken
$3,000,000$3,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,125,000$1,125,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Taxi Squad
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$1,100,000$1,100,000 ($0$0$0$0)
LD/RD, LW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Nov. 11, 2023 at 10:52 a.m.
#1
KFTW
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 44,762
Likes: 25,339
Nah you need Zadorov because Luke Hughes is soft
Nov. 11, 2023 at 10:55 a.m.
#2
Trade Zibanejad
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2023
Posts: 1,196
Likes: 250
I'm a Devils hater but this was a great writeup
Nov. 11, 2023 at 11:02 a.m.
#3
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 42,650
Likes: 19,326
Quoting: csick
Nah you need Zadorov because Luke Hughes is soft


“Smith stinks, let’s get Zadorov”

It boggles the mind how people see one as solution for the other.
Nov. 11, 2023 at 11:07 a.m.
#4
CGY
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2015
Posts: 5,552
Likes: 2,069
Hanifin makes sense for NJ
Kinger25 liked this.
Nov. 11, 2023 at 11:10 a.m.
#5
Berkly goat Catton
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2023
Posts: 5,761
Likes: 2,287
Hanifin probably make the most sense. Maybe Kovacevic or Sanheim could be good.
Kinger25 liked this.
Nov. 11, 2023 at 11:19 a.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 42,650
Likes: 19,326
Quoting: ItWasIn
Hanifin makes sense for NJ


Quoting: GuyGuyGuy
Hanifin probably make the most sense. Maybe Kovacevic or Sanheim could be good.


Totally agree. He is probably the closest to bringing the style of game that Graves and Severson brought. And would be helpful 5v5….which is really what we need to improve. Also, our GM has known him since he was a kid.
Nov. 11, 2023 at 11:33 a.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 11,171
Likes: 8,678
I've been in the Hanifin train to New Jersey for awhile now but thinking about it, for the price, Carrier might be a better option. Hanifin is the far superior player but if this is a straight rental type situation, is Jersey willing to spend for a rental Hanifin? Could there not be a situation where an extension is agreed up upon? I know Nemec is coming and there is Hughes, wouldn't a situation where you are forced to make a move because you have too much of a good thing be better than hoping young guys take huge strides?
dgibb10 liked this.
Nov. 11, 2023 at 12:16 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 69
Likes: 6
I was looking at stats recently and was thinking if hits and/or blocked shots could be a factor for the defense. As of today, Severson has more blocked shots than any of the devils d-man thus far this season, and Graves has the same amount of blocked shots as Siegenthaler (who has the most for the Devils thus far). Carrier would be great (top 10 in blocked shots among d-man atm). Zadorov would deliver allot of hits, but does not have the best stats as far for blocked shots and Tanev is the inverse. Wish we could get someone like Hanifin or like Connor Murphy (CHI) or bring back Adam Larsson. But, those guys will probably cost an arm and leg and some of them are probably not up for a trade. Hopefully, Miller will play soon and help the defense. Side Note: any updates on his status?
Nov. 11, 2023 at 12:17 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 7,122
Likes: 2,054
Quoting: NHLfan10506
“Smith stinks, let’s get Zadorov”

It boggles the mind how people see one as solution for the other.


Zads is better than Smitty
Once Brendan gets beat is when it gets bad. Zads less so, but I hear ya
Nov. 11, 2023 at 12:29 p.m.
#10
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2023
Posts: 2,981
Likes: 590
Tanev is going to the leafs I pray every night for it at least lol
Nov. 11, 2023 at 12:46 p.m.
#11
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 13,695
Likes: 3,714
Quoting: ItWasIn
Hanifin makes sense for NJ


I like Hanafin a ton but it really depends on price. My proposal has been to Trade for hanafin, then move bahl this offseason and Marino next offseason. That should basically recoup our assets. We'd need to convince Hanafin to sign for around 6 mill tho to really make it work

This year
Siegs-Hamilton
Hanafin-Marino
Bahl-Hughes

Next year (this is imo our best year to win the cup):
Siegs-Hamilton
Hughes-Marino
Hanafin-Nemec

2 years
Siegs-Hamilton
Hughes-nemec
Hanafin-Casey/Rental

3 years
Hughes-Nemec
Siegs-Hamilton
Hanafin-Casey
Nov. 11, 2023 at 12:48 p.m.
#12
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 13,695
Likes: 3,714
Quoting: Lancebmx
I've been in the Hanifin train to New Jersey for awhile now but thinking about it, for the price, Carrier might be a better option. Hanifin is the far superior player but if this is a straight rental type situation, is Jersey willing to spend for a rental Hanifin? Could there not be a situation where an extension is agreed up upon? I know Nemec is coming and there is Hughes, wouldn't a situation where you are forced to make a move because you have too much of a good thing be better than hoping young guys take huge strides?


Imo if we were to trade for Hanafin it would lead to Bahl and then Marino trades down the line

Would improve our Dcore significantly the next few years, and long term should be similar cost to play Hanafin-Casey vs Bahl-Marino, with us probably getting more assets selling Bahl+Marino than we gave paying for hamilton
Nov. 11, 2023 at 12:49 p.m.
#13
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 13,695
Likes: 3,714
Quoting: GuyGuyGuy
Hanifin probably make the most sense. Maybe Kovacevic or Sanheim could be good.


Sanheim doesn't make sense imo but I've been on the Kovacevic train. can be a 7th dman next year as well. I'm assuming price around a 3rd?
Nov. 11, 2023 at 12:57 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 11,171
Likes: 8,678
Quoting: dgibb10
Imo if we were to trade for Hanafin it would lead to Bahl and then Marino trades down the line

Would improve our Dcore significantly the next few years, and long term should be similar cost to play Hanafin-Casey vs Bahl-Marino, with us probably getting more assets selling Bahl+Marino than we gave paying for hamilton


I could see Bahl being in a package for Hanifin but having to make trades because you have too much of a good thing isn't a bad problem to have. Could use those trade chips to upgrade a weak point in the roster somewhere at the time.
Nov. 11, 2023 at 1:42 p.m.
#15
Berkly goat Catton
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2023
Posts: 5,761
Likes: 2,287
Quoting: dgibb10
Sanheim doesn't make sense imo but I've been on the Kovacevic train. can be a 7th dman next year as well. I'm assuming price around a 3rd?

Third and a prospect would be fine
Nov. 11, 2023 at 3:04 p.m.
#16
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 13,695
Likes: 3,714
Quoting: Lancebmx
I could see Bahl being in a package for Hanifin but having to make trades because you have too much of a good thing isn't a bad problem to have. Could use those trade chips to upgrade a weak point in the roster somewhere at the time.


Bahl wouldn't be in the Hanafin package. We need him for this year and Hanafin will replace Smith. Bahl would be traded this coming offseason to recoup some assets and Nemec will take his spot as the 6th dman
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll