SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Trade Machine Proposals

Who says know

Created by: suora
Published: Dec. 14, 2023 at 4:20 a.m.
Salary Cap: $83,500,000
Season Days: 126/192 (66%)
Central Registry Determination: This trade has been rejected because the upper limit has been exceeded by one of the trade parties

Logo of the Columbus Blue JacketsColumbus Blue Jackets

OutStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Laine, PatrikColumbus Blue JacketsNHL-$5,709,375011---17538--
InStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Granlund, MikaelSan Jose SharksNHL-$3,281,250011---2231619--
ChangeCap SpaceRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Initial$3,036,4202245643612
Change$2,428,125000000
Final$5,464,545 (↑)2245643612-21311

Logo of the San Jose SharksSan Jose Sharks

OutStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Granlund, MikaelSan Jose SharksNHL-$3,281,250011---2231619--
InStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Laine, PatrikColumbus Blue JacketsNHL-$5,709,375011---17538--
ChangeCap SpaceRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Initial$1,708,1432349704513
Change-$2,428,125000000
Final-$719,982 (↓)23497045132-13-11
Dec. 14, 2023 at 8:22 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2023
Posts: 173
Likes: 43
I would say CBJ says No. Laine is terrible right now. However he has a higher expected points and goals than Granlund. Whereas Grandlund is playing way better than what is his expected points per game propose. So if they both bounce back to their expected points Laine is more valuable. So that is risky for CBJ if they don't bounce that is risky for Sharks. Although Laine could go well with Hertl.
penguinswin liked this.
Dec. 14, 2023 at 9:42 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 11,353
Likes: 4,728
Quoting: SantasLittleCrackpot
I would say CBJ says No. Laine is terrible right now. However he has a higher expected points and goals than Granlund. Whereas Grandlund is playing way better than what is his expected points per game propose. So if they both bounce back to their expected points Laine is more valuable. So that is risky for CBJ if they don't bounce that is risky for Sharks. Although Laine could go well with Hertl.


He could but Granlund is a lot cheaper! This is an interesting offer tbh
Dec. 14, 2023 at 10:10 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2021
Posts: 1,163
Likes: 386
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
He could but Granlund is a lot cheaper! This is an interesting offer tbh


Not sure interesting is the word I would use....but ok...
Dec. 14, 2023 at 10:12 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 11,353
Likes: 4,728
Quoting: penguinswin
Not sure interesting is the word I would use....but ok...


You’re just mad at how good Granlund plays with us and how bad he was with you!!!
Dec. 15, 2023 at 7:17 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2021
Posts: 1,163
Likes: 386
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
You’re just mad at how good Granlund plays with us and how bad he was with you!!!


Actually i ain't mad at all. Average players look on bad teams all the time. But when they have talent to play with they look like amateurs. You can keep him! Lol!
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll