Quoting: CBA
For Liljegren maybe
Savard is a lock for the top 4 like Matheson & Guhle. The rest will fight for the remaining spots. The others will be sent in Laval
Only Matheson Savard & Guhle are top 4 dman. The others are bottom pairing dman, you don’t trade a top 4 dman to make room for another #6. Guys can play in Laval (Hutson, Reinbacher, Mailloux, Struble, etc.)
Yes on a contender he would be a bottom pairing dman, but on a lot of teams he would he playing top 4 minutes. In MTL he is playing top pairing minutes so he is very valuable for us.
I don't understand why people are down on Barron. He may not end up a true top pairing guy, but he's progressing well and increasing in responsibility at a young age with relatively little experience.
Many teams only end up with one true top pairing defender (if that). It's not unusual to have a #1 guy and a complementary partner rather than an actual #2. Barron could very well be the right partner for Guhle given time and development.
Barron only really needs two major things, success on a functional power play and awareness to protect himself when playing the puck. He just hit the 20 minute mark for average ice time and he's holding ground in goal differential (+3) outside of penalty killing (not his strength, but we were missing Savard). He's only 22 with 76 games under his belt. The smaller things are gradually improving naturally.
Montreal fans need to be patient with this rebuild and not push for more before it makes sense to do so. Let the team develop.
Other teams' fans need to realize Barron isn't trade bait. IF he is eventually moved, it will be because he's lost all value years from now and you can get him for cheap.
The only thing fans should be concerned about with regards to Barron are the 2 big "flaws". The PP issue isn't one he can do himself. It will be up to him to provide value there once the coaching staff figures it out. In the meantime he's on track and only needs to work on his spider sense to avoid dangerous hits.