i'd do it but only if we don't have prizes for winning.
Alright I'm fine with dropping the prizes. Get back to me on a topic. It has to be a question with two sides, yes and no.
so i'll first say that yes, whoever 'wins' doesn't get anything for 'winning'.
I have a question but i'm not gonna just do it for a full day, and i don't want to pick a time ... we could say it starts at midnight ET and goes until 2 days later. then on Thursday the others would vote for a winner. Until we figure this out, i will not tell you the question.
Let's phrase it this way... What about Anaheim's offseason changes to their roster, or the additions to any other Pacific team's roster, makes you think at least 3 teams will surpass Anaheim who finished first in the division last year?
Anaheim did lose Stoner and Theodore, yes, but still have Fowler, Lindholm, Vatanen, Montour, Manson, and Bieksa... Still one of the best defensive rosters in the league. They lost no forwards (that I'm aware of, at least not any big name forwards) and signed a quality backup goalie in Miller.
Calgary did add Hamonic and Smith, and could make a push, but I still see them under Anaheim.
San Jose lost Marleau and Schlemko and did nothing to replace them. How are they going to improve?
LA added Cammy... As if they needed another aging scorer past his prime. But that's about it.
look at the division Anaheim's in.
HE JUST WROTE SEVERAL SENTENCES ABOUT THEIR DIVISION
Alright I'm fine with dropping the prizes. Get back to me on a topic. It has to be a question with two sides, yes and no.
so i'll first say that yes, whoever 'wins' doesn't get anything for 'winning'.
I have a question but i'm not gonna just do it for a full day, and i don't want to pick a time ... we could say it starts at midnight ET and goes until 2 days later. then on Thursday the others would vote for a winner. Until we figure this out, i will not tell you the question.
It would take multiple hour(s). I would rather that we are both on at the same time, rather us having extended periods of time.
so i'll first say that yes, whoever 'wins' doesn't get anything for 'winning'.
I have a question but i'm not gonna just do it for a full day, and i don't want to pick a time ... we could say it starts at midnight ET and goes until 2 days later. then on Thursday the others would vote for a winner. Until we figure this out, i will not tell you the question.
It would take multiple hour(s). I would rather that we are both on at the same time, rather us having extended periods of time.
but i don't want to schedule one exact time. I'm sure we can discuss quite a bit in 2 days.
The earlier you know the topic, the better, so yes. That being said, make sure it's a yes/no question, and make sure you pick either the affirmative or the negative.
The earlier you know the topic, the better, so yes. That being said, make sure it's a yes/no question, and make sure you pick either the affirmative or the negative.
the question is: Is Oscar Klefbom a top 10 d-man in the league?
The earlier you know the topic, the better, so yes. That being said, make sure it's a yes/no question, and make sure you pick either the affirmative or the negative.
the question is: Is Oscar Klefbom a top 10 d-man in the league?