SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Trade Machine Proposals

Draisaitl to Montreal

Created by: Charlesemile19
Published: Jan. 18 at 1:46 p.m.
Salary Cap: $83,500,000
Season Days: 91/192 (47%)
Central Registry Determination: This trade has met the central registry's trade checklist

Logo of the Edmonton OilersEdmonton Oilers

OutStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Draisaitl, LeonEdmonton OilersNHL-$4,028,646011---40212546--
InStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Matheson, MichaelMontreal CanadiensNHL-$2,310,547011---4462531--
Montembeault, SamuelMontreal CanadiensNHL-$473,958011-------2.850.91
Hutson, LaneMontreal CanadiensReserve List-$0001---------
Mesar, FilipWaivers ExemptMontreal CanadiensJunior-$0001---0000--
2025 1st round pick (Logo of the Montreal CanadiensMTL)---100------
ChangeCap SpaceRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Initial$201,4082245573411
Change$1,244,141113100
Final$1,445,549 (↑)23 (↑)46 (↑)60 (↑)4 (↑)411-150-15

Logo of the Montreal CanadiensMontreal Canadiens

OutStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Matheson, MichaelMontreal CanadiensNHL-$4,875,000011---4462531--
Montembeault, SamuelMontreal CanadiensNHL-$1,000,000011-------2.850.91
Hutson, LaneMontreal CanadiensReserve List-$0001---------
Mesar, FilipWaivers ExemptMontreal CanadiensJunior-$0001---0000--
2025 1st round pick (Logo of the Montreal CanadiensMTL)---100------
InStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Draisaitl, LeonEdmonton OilersNHL-$8,500,000011---40212546--
ChangeCap SpaceRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Initial$3,572,5002346734916
Change-$2,625,000-1-1-3-100
Final$947,500 (↓)22 (↓)45 (↓)70 (↓)3 (↓)91615015
Who refuses the deal
The chart has been hidden

Poll Options


Jan. 18 at 1:53 p.m.
#1
Mr.
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2022
Posts: 4,106
Likes: 1,388
montreal didnt suffer for 3 years just to sell the prospects for a 28 yo soon to be UFA
EatMyScoobySnack liked this.
Jan. 18 at 1:55 p.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2024
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
In a world where you know you sign him would you do it? Do you think the oilers accept this?
Jan. 18 at 2:04 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2021
Posts: 1,363
Likes: 295
Quoting: SMH
montreal didnt suffer for 3 years just to sell the prospects for a 28 yo soon to be UFA


I’m guessing it would come with an extension or a handshake deal. And yes you absolutely do for Leon Draisaitl. Doesn’t matter that he’s 28, just means he likely has 8 great years left in him. I’d pay more. Much more.
Caufield liked this.
Jan. 18 at 2:36 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2024
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Quoting: Dom1422
I’m guessing it would come with an extension or a handshake deal. And yes you absolutely do for Leon Draisaitl. Doesn’t matter that he’s 28, just means he likely has 8 great years left in him. I’d pay more. Much more.


The way i see it Edmonton gets 2 very good top 4 def, a good 1B goaltender that gives 35-40 quality starts a first round pick and a decent forward prospect so i think thats a fair trade
Jan. 18 at 2:49 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2021
Posts: 1,363
Likes: 295
Quoting: Charlesemile19
The way i see it Edmonton gets 2 very good top 4 def, a good 1B goaltender that gives 35-40 quality starts a first round pick and a decent forward prospect so i think thats a fair trade


I don’t see a world in which we give up both Matheson and Hutson though. Guhle is the only other D who has the trade value Hutson does.
Jan. 18 at 2:57 p.m.
#6
Sennecke is a gem
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2022
Posts: 4,521
Likes: 2,453
Quoting: SMH
montreal didnt suffer for 3 years just to sell the prospects for a 28 yo soon to be UFA


Drai proly still has at least 900-1000, and prob more
Jan. 18 at 3:40 p.m.
#7
Goggles86
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2023
Posts: 783
Likes: 141
MTL does not have the assets to make a deal like this. Their whole team is not worth a player of this caliper right now.
Jan. 18 at 3:41 p.m.
#8
Goggles86
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2023
Posts: 783
Likes: 141
Quoting: Charlesemile19
The way i see it Edmonton gets 2 very good top 4 def, a good 1B goaltender that gives 35-40 quality starts a first round pick and a decent forward prospect so i think thats a fair trade


There are 0 top 4 D in this trade.
Jan. 18 at 3:55 p.m.
#9
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2024
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Quoting: svfsdv
There are 0 top 4 D in this trade.


Matheson logs 27-28 minutes a game and has more than a point every two games he’s a top 4 D
Jan. 18 at 6:52 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2022
Posts: 288
Likes: 107
Quoting: svfsdv
There are 0 top 4 D in this trade.


This deal is a piece of work, it's just bad and I don't want to talk about it.

But just your comment in a vacuum is just bad. I get that you're upset that the Kulak pick became Hutson but don't be stupid about it. Also Matheson (on a bad Habs team) would be 6th in points on Edmonton, only behind McDavid, Drai, Nuge, Hyman and Bouchard.
EatMyScoobySnack liked this.
Jan. 18 at 7:31 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2022
Posts: 1,276
Likes: 413
Draisaitl have the best player to him every game and they aren't able to win an cup Stanley how the f uck you and think he will to come to Montreal and win it ?


Hutson, Montembeault and Mesar would provide more contributions as an team them the potential that Leon will bring on the first line.


Montembeault is currently Habs first goaltender and the next one who have the potential to be #1 is Fowler and he's not going to be ready for few season again.

Hutson is probably the best defensive prospect if not prospect in general for the team. IF he reach is celling of quarterback for the team Montreal will have is #1 that he never has for the last few years outside of the glorious day.


While Mesar is not the most flashy player would probably be the new arthuri lekhonen to the team and give good service to the team on an bottom six.
Jan. 22 at 11:38 a.m.
#12
Goggles86
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2023
Posts: 783
Likes: 141
Quoting: ReadyToGetFlamed
This deal is a piece of work, it's just bad and I don't want to talk about it.

But just your comment in a vacuum is just bad. I get that you're upset that the Kulak pick became Hutson but don't be stupid about it. Also Matheson (on a bad Habs team) would be 6th in points on Edmonton, only behind McDavid, Drai, Nuge, Hyman and Bouchard.


Im not sure what you are on about. But ill repeat myself. There are no top 4 D men in this trade.
Jan. 22 at 11:40 a.m.
#13
Goggles86
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2023
Posts: 783
Likes: 141
Quoting: Charlesemile19
Matheson logs 27-28 minutes a game and has more than a point every two games he’s a top 4 D


Yes MTL is a bad team with bad players. So mediocre guys look good.
Jan. 22 at 4:50 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2022
Posts: 288
Likes: 107
Quoting: svfsdv
Yes MTL is a bad team with bad players. So mediocre guys look good.


That is some backwards thinking logic, it's a circular argument at best that just leads into "on a better team, he will have better players around him to finish off his plays, as he was alone on the bad team." The only reason anyone would use your argument is to devalue the player from what he actually is, which is exactly what you're doing. While someone who wants to improve how he looks would say, he is the only one on his team getting these numbers with little support.

So why don't you stop being salty and give him the respect he deserves, you aren't a GM, you're trying to frame him as bad but you aren't in a negotiation, it doesn't do anything but make you look silly. He isn't a 1D on Edmonton obviously, but he would easily be your 3rd, depending if he gets the McDavid boost, 2nd best defencemen, as of rn better then Nurse and Ceci with no real debate on that, Ekholm is hard to compare because what he brings is stability, so I'll say 3rd D because Oilers are **** without Ekholm.
Jan. 23 at 8:02 a.m.
#15
Goggles86
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2023
Posts: 783
Likes: 141
Quoting: ReadyToGetFlamed
That is some backwards thinking logic, it's a circular argument at best that just leads into "on a better team, he will have better players around him to finish off his plays, as he was alone on the bad team." The only reason anyone would use your argument is to devalue the player from what he actually is, which is exactly what you're doing. While someone who wants to improve how he looks would say, he is the only one on his team getting these numbers with little support.

So why don't you stop being salty and give him the respect he deserves, you aren't a GM, you're trying to frame him as bad but you aren't in a negotiation, it doesn't do anything but make you look silly. He isn't a 1D on Edmonton obviously, but he would easily be your 3rd, depending if he gets the McDavid boost, 2nd best defencemen, as of rn better then Nurse and Ceci with no real debate on that, Ekholm is hard to compare because what he brings is stability, so I'll say 3rd D because Oilers are **** without Ekholm.


You arent a GM either. You are just trying to over value him...blah blah blah...Im not going to re write it all. Just read your own comment, reverse everything and then say it to yourself.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Loading animation
Submit Poll Edit