SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Jiricek

Created by: westleysnipez
Team: 2023-24 Vancouver Canucks
Initial Creation Date: Jan. 30, 2024
Published: Jan. 30, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
1.
CBJ
  1. Lekkerimäki, Jonathan
  2. 2024 1st round pick (VAN)
2.
VAN
  1. 2024 1st round pick (TBL)
  2. 2024 2nd round pick (VAN)
Additional Details:
Per Freidman: Hawks have been pestering the Canucks about Kuzmenko most of the season, even back when Beauvillier was dealt. Belief is the Canucks want to keep Kuzmenko but may be willing to trade him out to bring in a guy like Lindholm or Guentzel, but the value has to be there for Vancouver. Expect an over pay by Chicago to get there guy, an offensive guy short term who can play with Bedard.
3.
VAN
  1. Lindholm, Elias ($2,425,000 retained)
CGY
  1. Bains, Arshdeep
  2. 2024 1st round pick (TBL)
  3. 2024 2nd round pick (VAN)
4.
SJS
  1. Bloom, Josh
  2. 2024 3rd round pick (VAN)
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the VAN
2025
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
2026
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$83,500,000$79,848,750$850,000$1,000,000$3,651,250
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$8,000,000$8,000,000
C, LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$6,650,000$6,650,000
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$7,350,000$7,350,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,425,000$2,425,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,100,000$1,100,000
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$825,000$825,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,900,000$1,900,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$4,950,000$4,950,000
RW, LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$4,750,000$4,750,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,600,000$1,600,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,150,000$1,150,000
RW, C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$883,750$883,750
C
RFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$7,850,000$7,850,000
LD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$4,400,000$4,400,000
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,750,000$3,750,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$918,333$918,333 (Performance Bonus$1,000,000$1M)
RD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,800,000$1,800,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$775,000$775,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$775,000$775,000
RD
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,250,000$3,250,000
LD/RD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$775,000$775,000
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$775,000$775,000
LW
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Feb. 4 at 12:45 a.m.
#101
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 12,074
Likes: 3,207
Quoting: westleysnipez
With the number of times you've moved the goal posts you've gotta be across the parking lot by now.

" ̶x̶G̶F̶%̶ ̶d̶o̶e̶s̶n̶'̶t̶ ̶c̶o̶u̶n̶t̶"

This is you saying it does.

"̶O̶h̶ ̶i̶t̶ ̶w̶a̶s̶ ̶p̶o̶w̶e̶r̶p̶l̶a̶y̶!̶"

It's 5v5 xGF%

̶I̶t̶'̶s̶ ̶b̶e̶c̶a̶u̶s̶e̶ ̶h̶e̶'̶s̶ ̶a̶ ̶s̶n̶i̶p̶e̶r̶,̶ ̶n̶o̶t̶ ̶a̶ ̶p̶l̶a̶y̶ ̶d̶r̶i̶v̶e̶r̶!̶

And then we pointed out he was ahead in 1a/60 and you got all mad and called me delusional as you do when you lose a debate.


Really dude, you've mixed up multiple stats and brought the same standard arguments you always do because it's the same four stats that you think you kind of understand but don't.


My apologies for not instantly identifying what you were talking about.

Primary assist/60 vs who?
Quoting: westleysnipez
With the number of times you've moved the goal posts you've gotta be across the parking lot by now.

" ̶x̶G̶F̶%̶ ̶d̶o̶e̶s̶n̶'̶t̶ ̶c̶o̶u̶n̶t̶"

This is you saying it does.

"̶O̶h̶ ̶i̶t̶ ̶w̶a̶s̶ ̶p̶o̶w̶e̶r̶p̶l̶a̶y̶!̶"

It's 5v5 xGF%

̶I̶t̶'̶s̶ ̶b̶e̶c̶a̶u̶s̶e̶ ̶h̶e̶'̶s̶ ̶a̶ ̶s̶n̶i̶p̶e̶r̶,̶ ̶n̶o̶t̶ ̶a̶ ̶p̶l̶a̶y̶ ̶d̶r̶i̶v̶e̶r̶!̶

And then we pointed out he was ahead in 1a/60 and you got all mad and called me delusional as you do when you lose a debate.


Really dude, you've mixed up multiple stats and brought the same standard arguments you always do because it's the same four stats that you think you kind of understand but don't.


My apologies for not instantly understanding what comment I’ve made in the past you were talking about in your ramblings.

Again, context and nuance matters to people who actually understand what they’re talking about.

Jack Hughes is a play driver. He’s the one carrying the puck in, shooting it, making the passes that lead to shots. You can see this in his metrics in entries, shot creation, passing etc. or by just watching the game. Since he is the one generating chances for both him and his teammates, the amount of xGoals generated with him on the ice is more meaningful.

Kuzmenko is a slow finisher (one of the slowest skaters in the league). He is not the one taking it in, generating his own chances, or making the passes that lead to chances. Again you can see this in his metrics or by just watching the game. So since he is not the one creating these chances, it is not as meaningful the amount of xGoals generated while on the ice.

And again, if you were interested in nuance or a meaningful discussion or simply had an understanding of what you were talking about, that would matter to you.

But instead you spout metrics you barely understand in hopes of finding what you think is some kind of “gotcha”

Kuzmenko is ahead in primary assists/60 vs who? Certainly not Jack Hughes who’s at 1.8 compared to Kuzmenkos 0.7 at all strengths and 1 vs 0.6 at even strength.
Feb. 4 at 12:49 a.m.
#102
Thread Starter
westleysnipez
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 1,368
Likes: 586
Quoting: dgibb10
My apologies for not instantly identifying what you were talking about.

Primary assist/60 vs who?

My apologies for not instantly understanding what comment I’ve made in the past you were talking about in your ramblings.

Again, context and nuance matters to people who actually understand what they’re talking about.

Jack Hughes is a play driver. He’s the one carrying the puck in, shooting it, making the passes that lead to shots. You can see this in his metrics in entries, shot creation, passing etc. or by just watching the game. Since he is the one generating chances for both him and his teammates, the amount of xGoals generated with him on the ice is more meaningful.

Kuzmenko is a slow finisher (one of the slowest skaters in the league). He is not the one taking it in, generating his own chances, or making the passes that lead to chances. Again you can see this in his metrics or by just watching the game. So since he is not the one creating these chances, it is not as meaningful the amount of xGoals generated while on the ice.

And again, if you were interested in nuance or a meaningful discussion or simply had an understanding of what you were talking about, that would matter to you.

But instead you spout metrics you barely understand in hopes of finding what you think is some kind of “gotcha”

Kuzmenko is ahead in primary assists/60 vs who? Certainly not Jack Hughes who’s at 1.8 compared to Kuzmenkos 0.7 at all strengths and 1 vs 0.6 at even strength.


It's hilarious how you cannot resist insisting upon yourself.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll