SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Big upgrades

Created by: Kachowski47
Team: 2023-24 Edmonton Oilers
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 2, 2024
Published: Feb. 2, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
EDM
  1. Allen, Jake ($1,925,000 retained)
  2. Kovacevic, Johnathan
  3. Savard, David
  4. 2024 3rd round pick (MIN)
Additional Details:
The Habs give Edmonton upgrades at their 2nd and third pairing RD spots as well as in goal for the rest of this season and the next season while retaining 50% on jake allen and adding a third round pick as a sweetener
MTL
  1. Ceci, Cody
  2. Desharnais, Vincent
  3. Petrov, Matvei
  4. 2024 1st round pick (EDM)
  5. 2025 1st round pick (EDM)
Additional Details:
Edmonton gives montreal 2 firsts and a decent prospect while giving up a negative asset in ceci
Buyouts
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the NSH
2025
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
2026
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
20$83,500,000$81,208,334$850,000$3,550,000$2,291,666
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$5,125,000$5,125,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$12,500,000$12,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$5,500,000$5,500,000
RW, LW
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$5,125,000$5,125,000
LW, C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$8,500,000$8,500,000
C, LW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$775,000$775,000 (Performance Bonus$3,225,000$3M)
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$2,100,000$2,100,000
C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$775,000$775,000
RW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$900,000$900,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$775,000$775,000 (Performance Bonus$325,000$325K)
RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$9,250,000$9,250,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$3,900,000$3,900,000
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$2,600,000$2,600,000
G
UFA - 3
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,500,000$3,500,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$0$0
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LD/RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$766,667$766,667
RD
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Feb. 2 at 5:20 p.m.
#26
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2023
Posts: 66
Likes: 2
Quoting: PurpleHippo
Kulak and Desh have been the best bottom pairing in the NHL, no shot we separate them.
We need a Ceci upgrade but Savard isn't that, they're pretty much equals.
We may want Allen but tbh Pickards been great, until he starts playing poorly as our backup I don't see a reason in changing that.

If we're going to move 2 firsts and a prospect we'll be trying to get a substantial upgrade on Ceci.

Edmonton doesnt have the cap space or assets to make a trade for a massive upgrade on ceci but savard is definitely an upgrade on ceci he is a former cup winner, hes better defensively, has a significantly higher ppg and is having a career year
Feb. 2 at 5:22 p.m.
#27
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2023
Posts: 66
Likes: 2
Quoting: SupremeBone
Well, okay.

Have ya checked out their stats since Knoblauch took over?


That always happens when teams get new coaches but they always cool off lets see if edmonton continues this 16 game win streak when they come back from the break
Feb. 2 at 5:26 p.m.
#28
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 564
Likes: 247
Quoting: Kachowski47
Edmonton doesnt have the cap space or assets to make a trade for a massive upgrade on ceci but savard is definitely an upgrade on ceci he is a former cup winner, hes better defensively, has a significantly higher ppg and is having a career year


We do in regards to both cap and assets.

You're basing your argument around Ceci's play 5 years ago as well, since Pittsburgh he has been a lot better and matured into his game.
Savard isn't what most fans would hope the Oilers go for, he's ok but about the same as Ceci, no real reason to make a move there.
Oilers_29 and CD282 liked this.
Feb. 2 at 5:26 p.m.
#29
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 2,516
Likes: 1,647
Quoting: Kachowski47
That always happens when teams get new coaches but they always cool off lets see if edmonton continues this 16 game win streak when they come back from the break

Well, 32 games is a pretty long time & they're top-5 or top-10 in every defensive category. I get that you want to see it last longer, but I think this should be evidence enough that they're not the tire fire people have called them in years past.
mm1010, Oilers_29 and CD282 liked this.
Feb. 2 at 5:27 p.m.
#30
Mac1010
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 1,690
Likes: 730
Quoting: WranglerWranglin
GP TOI CF CA CF% CF% rel FF FA FF% FF% rel oiGF oiSH% oiGA oiSV% PDO oZS% dZS%
3 yrs EDM NHL 203 2520.5 3482 4322 44.6 -12.0 2635 3318 44.3 -12.0 185 9.7 223 90.8 100.5 35.7 64.3
6 yrs OTT NHL 440 8425.4 7690 10286 42.8 -8.8 5735 7664 42.8 -8.3 345 8.3 508 90.9 99.3 39.5 60.5


Per Game
GC G A PTS GC PIM S
6 yrs OTT NHL 0.09 0.07 0.20 0.27 0.09 0.20 1.70
3 yrs EDM NHL 0.08 0.03 0.25 0.28 0.08 0.24 1.17


I see what you did you did all strengths. not a great way to look at things for instance in OTT he atcually got some PP Time almost 400 minutes over 6 years compared to 12 minutes over the 3 with edmonton...
in Edmonton he is leaned on heavily on the PK which will skew the possession numbers down.
TRy 5v5 and you will see he is above 50% and well ahead of his time in OTT.
Feb. 2 at 5:29 p.m.
#31
Mac1010
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 1,690
Likes: 730
Quoting: WranglerWranglin
GP TOI CF CA CF% CF% rel FF FA FF% FF% rel oiGF oiSH% oiGA oiSV% PDO oZS% dZS%
3 yrs EDM NHL 203 2520.5 3482 4322 44.6 -12.0 2635 3318 44.3 -12.0 185 9.7 223 90.8 100.5 35.7 64.3
6 yrs OTT NHL 440 8425.4 7690 10286 42.8 -8.8 5735 7664 42.8 -8.3 345 8.3 508 90.9 99.3 39.5 60.5


Per Game
GC G A PTS GC PIM S
6 yrs OTT NHL 0.09 0.07 0.20 0.27 0.09 0.20 1.70
3 yrs EDM NHL 0.08 0.03 0.25 0.28 0.08 0.24 1.17


I see what you did you did all strengths. not a great way to look at things for instance in OTT he atcually got some PP Time almost 400 minutes over 6 years compared to 12 minutes over the 3 with edmonton...
in Edmonton he is leaned on heavily on the PK which will skew the possession numbers down.
TRy 5v5 and you will see he is above 50% and well ahead of his time in OTT.
CD282 liked this.
Feb. 2 at 5:30 p.m.
#32
Mac1010
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 1,690
Likes: 730
Quoting: Kachowski47
That always happens when teams get new coaches but they always cool off lets see if edmonton continues this 16 game win streak when they come back from the break


you do know they are 24-3 its not just this win streak right?
Oilers_29 liked this.
Feb. 2 at 5:31 p.m.
#33
Mac1010
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 1,690
Likes: 730
Quoting: Kachowski47
Edmonton doesnt have the cap space or assets to make a trade for a massive upgrade on ceci but savard is definitely an upgrade on ceci he is a former cup winner, hes better defensively, has a significantly higher ppg and is having a career year


other than the cup please show me how he is better? show me some stats and facts
Oilers_29 liked this.
Feb. 2 at 5:34 p.m.
#34
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2022
Posts: 967
Likes: 363
Quoting: mm1010
I see what you did you did all strengths. not a great way to look at things for instance in OTT he atcually got some PP Time almost 400 minutes over 6 years compared to 12 minutes over the 3 with edmonton...
in Edmonton he is leaned on heavily on the PK which will skew the possession numbers down.
TRy 5v5 and you will see he is above 50% and well ahead of his time in OTT.


If you think those numbers are "well ahead" you need to raise your standards.
Feb. 2 at 5:34 p.m.
#35
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 2,516
Likes: 1,647
Quoting: mm1010
I see what you did you did all strengths. not a great way to look at things for instance in OTT he atcually got some PP Time almost 400 minutes over 6 years compared to 12 minutes over the 3 with edmonton...
in Edmonton he is leaned on heavily on the PK which will skew the possession numbers down.
TRy 5v5 and you will see he is above 50% and well ahead of his time in OTT.

Not a strong counter argument as his above-50% is still well below team average. As such, to outsiders, he'll appear to be a major drag on the team despite the good work you and I see him doing. And, in fairness, he certainly isn't playing particularly well. It's just that he's covering the bet for a player at his cap hit playing the role he is.
Feb. 2 at 5:36 p.m.
#36
Mac1010
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 1,690
Likes: 730
Quoting: WranglerWranglin
If you think those numbers are "well ahead" you need to raise your standards.


he was like 44 % in ottawa and over 50in edmonton that a pretty significant shift
Feb. 2 at 5:38 p.m.
#37
Mac1010
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 1,690
Likes: 730
Quoting: SupremeBone
Not a strong counter argument as his above-50% is still well below team average. As such, to outsiders, he'll appear to be a major drag on the team despite the good work you and I see him doing. And, in fairness, he certainly isn't playing particularly well. It's just that he's covering the bet for a player at his cap hit playing the role he is.


I wasnt saying he was our best Dman. He would be the one we would look to upgrade on. being above 50 is yes below the team average but still positive. especially when he is comparing to OTT years ago saying no improvement when there is a significant shift. moving to savard is a lateral move and not worth doing if theres another ekhom out there you do it. if not you can live with him being over 50%
Feb. 2 at 5:40 p.m.
#38
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2022
Posts: 967
Likes: 363
Quoting: mm1010
I wasnt saying he was our best Dman. He would be the one we would look to upgrade on. being above 50 is yes below the team average but still positive. especially when he is comparing to OTT years ago saying no improvement when there is a significant shift. moving to savard is a lateral move and not worth doing if theres another ekhom out there you do it. if not you can live with him being over 50%


His relatives are worse in Edmonton, he's the same defender on a better team.
Kachowski47 liked this.
Feb. 2 at 5:41 p.m.
#39
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2023
Posts: 66
Likes: 2
Quoting: PurpleHippo
We do in regards to both cap and assets.

You're basing your argument around Ceci's play 5 years ago as well, since Pittsburgh he has been a lot better and matured into his game.
Savard isn't what most fans would hope the Oilers go for, he's ok but about the same as Ceci, no real reason to make a move there.


Your best assets are late firsts and a prospect that have middle six potential and in terms of cap the team you trade with would need to retain 50% just to have a hope of making anything work
Feb. 2 at 5:41 p.m.
#40
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 2,516
Likes: 1,647
Quoting: WranglerWranglin
His relatives are worse in Edmonton, he's the same defender on a better team.

Do you hold any regard for microstat pages like JFresh?
Feb. 2 at 5:45 p.m.
#41
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2023
Posts: 66
Likes: 2
Quoting: mm1010
I wasnt saying he was our best Dman. He would be the one we would look to upgrade on. being above 50 is yes below the team average but still positive. especially when he is comparing to OTT years ago saying no improvement when there is a significant shift. moving to savard is a lateral move and not worth doing if theres another ekhom out there you do it. if not you can live with him being over 50%


Savard is not a lateral move he has been known as a good stay at home defenseman and is having a career year despite how bad the habs have been meanwhile ceci is maybe slightly better than he has been in the past but he is playing on a team that has a chance at good playoff run you just admitted that he is barely above 50% is below team average and is the spot you need an upgrade the most
Feb. 2 at 5:45 p.m.
#42
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2022
Posts: 967
Likes: 363
Quoting: SupremeBone
Do you hold any regard for microstat pages like JFresh?


Everything is a piece to the puzzle.
Feb. 2 at 5:45 p.m.
#43
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 564
Likes: 247
Quoting: Kachowski47
Your best assets are late firsts and a prospect that have middle six potential and in terms of cap the team you trade with would need to retain 50% just to have a hope of making anything work


Players can be moved, like they are in every trade, to create cap.
We also don't have hopes in getting elite talent back, however nice that would be.

But an upgrade on Ceci is possible for a decent cost, Savard isn't the player our fans would hope for though.
Oilers_29 and CD282 liked this.
Feb. 2 at 5:46 p.m.
#44
Mac1010
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 1,690
Likes: 730
Quoting: WranglerWranglin
His relatives are worse in Edmonton, he's the same defender on a better team.


Im not finding what your finding..
Feb. 2 at 5:48 p.m.
#45
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2023
Posts: 66
Likes: 2
Quoting: PurpleHippo
Players can be moved, like they are in every trade, to create cap.
We also don't have hopes in getting elite talent back, however nice that would be.

But an upgrade on Ceci is possible for a decent cost, Savard isn't the player our fans would hope for though.


yes but who could you possibly move to make cap space and who will you call up. Any move made where you move multiple pieces with cap hits above league min will possibly fill one hole but just create another
Feb. 2 at 5:51 p.m.
#46
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2022
Posts: 967
Likes: 363
Quoting: mm1010
Im not finding what your finding..


5 on 5 ------ -------- CF% Rel ------ FF% Rel
3yrs ---- EDM -4.2 ---------- -4.1
6 yrs ---- OTT -3.6 ---------- -3.2
Feb. 2 at 5:52 p.m.
#47
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 2,516
Likes: 1,647
Quoting: WranglerWranglin
Everything is a piece to the puzzle.

Okay, well these following links show his player card after his year in PIT and following his first year in EDM. They serve to better explain what we're trying to get across. We have to concede that his performance this year has been worse in comparison to his team, though this is largely the result of the emergence and excellence of Boucholm. His raw numbers have stayed largely similar.

https://twitter.com/JFreshHockey/status/1420421717256806401
https://twitter.com/JFreshHockey/status/1570425503588253704
Feb. 2 at 6:00 p.m.
#48
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2022
Posts: 967
Likes: 363
Quoting: SupremeBone
Okay, well these following links show his player card after his year in PIT and following his first year in EDM. They serve to better explain what we're trying to get across. We have to concede that his performance this year has been worse in comparison to his team, though this is largely the result of the emergence and excellence of Boucholm. His raw numbers have stayed largely similar.

https://twitter.com/JFreshHockey/status/1420421717256806401
https://twitter.com/JFreshHockey/status/1570425503588253704


Sure, but his possession metrics have gotten worse every season since then, he's had a serious uptick in ozone starts this year, his PDO has actually increased so he's getting luckier than he has been while putting up worse numbers progressively since he's been in Edmonton. He is the same defenceman he has always been and declining while being on a better team.
Feb. 2 at 6:00 p.m.
#49
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2022
Posts: 967
Likes: 363
Quoting: SupremeBone
Okay, well these following links show his player card after his year in PIT and following his first year in EDM. They serve to better explain what we're trying to get across. We have to concede that his performance this year has been worse in comparison to his team, though this is largely the result of the emergence and excellence of Boucholm. His raw numbers have stayed largely similar.

https://twitter.com/JFreshHockey/status/1420421717256806401
https://twitter.com/JFreshHockey/status/1570425503588253704


Sure, but his possession metrics have gotten worse every season since then, he's had a serious uptick in ozone starts this year, his PDO has actually increased so he's getting luckier than he has been while putting up worse numbers progressively since he's been in Edmonton. He is the same defenceman he has always been and declining while being on a better team.
Feb. 2 at 6:03 p.m.
#50
Mac1010
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 1,690
Likes: 730
Quoting: Kachowski47
Savard is not a lateral move he has been known as a good stay at home defenseman and is having a career year despite how bad the habs have been meanwhile ceci is maybe slightly better than he has been in the past but he is playing on a team that has a chance at good playoff run you just admitted that he is barely above 50% is below team average and is the spot you need an upgrade the most


you know with an average about 50% will fall under that average right? doesn't make him a bad player.
That is why they would look at upgrading ceci. While he is not really hurting the team they could potentially find another ekholm type that will push it.
Savard is not that player.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll