SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

3 team block buster

Created by: Shaun80
Team: 2023-24 Calgary Flames
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 6, 2024
Published: Feb. 6, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Boston trades Ullmark to the Oilers for a 1st and 3rd.
They trade that 1st and Lohrei to the Flames for Hanifan, and a 4th for retention.
The Flames send Sharingovich and Vladar to the Bruins for Beecher and Debrusk.
The flames trade Debrusk and Tanev to the Oilers each for a 2nd and oneof the prospects. Ceci is included to make the cap hit work for te Oilers.
The Oilers send a 1st to the Flames to dump Campbell's contract.
Trades
1.
2.
CGY
  1. Bourgault, Xavier
  2. Broberg, Philip
  3. Campbell, Jack
  4. Ceci, Cody
  5. 2024 1st round pick (EDM)
  6. 2024 2nd round pick (EDM)
  7. 2025 1st round pick (EDM)
  8. 2025 3rd round pick (EDM)
  9. 2025 4th round pick (EDM)
  10. 2026 2nd round pick (EDM)
  11. 2026 4th round pick (EDM)
EDM
  1. DeBrusk, Jake ($2,000,000 retained)
  2. Tanev, Christopher ($2,250,000 retained)
  3. Ullmark, Linus
3.
CGY
BOS
  1. 2025 3rd round pick (EDM)
Retained Salary Transactions
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CGY
2025
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
2026
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$83,500,000$83,484,165$0$1,077,500$15,835
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$10,500,000$10,500,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$7,000,000$7,000,000
C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,500,000$5,500,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,800,000$5,800,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,350,000$5,350,000
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,900,000$4,900,000
RW, LW
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LW, C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$925,000$925,000
C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$775,000$775,000
RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$863,333$863,333
LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,300,000$1,300,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$855,833$855,833
RW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$825,000$825,000
RW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,250,000$6,250,000
LD/RD
NTC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,550,000$4,550,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,000,000$6,000,000
G
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,500,000$2,500,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$3,250,000$3,250,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$813,333$813,333 (Performance Bonus$15,000$15K)
G
RFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$775,000$775,000
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$925,000$925,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$762,500$762,500
LD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$762,500$762,500
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,300,000$2,300,000
LW, RW, C
RFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Feb. 6 at 4:47 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 19,898
Likes: 8,882
Ya….umm…no

Ullmark declines anyway
Feb. 6 at 4:56 p.m.
#2
Future Norris guy
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 15,605
Likes: 8,625
laugh How many tmes do we need to spell it out? That Linus Ullmark won't waive for any Canadian team, So Calgary and Edmonton aren't happening.

laugh Come on dude, Debrusk and Tanev aren't getting you 11 pieces out of Edmonton. This site is becoming so laugh

More like 3 team Joke Buster.
Feb. 6 at 5:00 p.m.
#3
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2023
Posts: 1,407
Likes: 568
Quoting: MoSeider53
laugh How many tmes do we need to spell it out? That Linus Ullmark won't waive for any Canadian team, So Calgary and Edmonton aren't happening.

laugh Come on dude, Debrusk and Tanev aren't getting you 11 pieces out of Edmonton. This site is becoming so laugh


Only 6 of the pieces out of edmonton are for tanev and debrusk, 2nd and a prospect for each player. 4ths for the retention on each. Campbell isn't a piece, he comes with a 1st round pick to get his contract off the books. The 1st and 3rd were for ullmark. And ceci is just a cap casualty.
Feb. 6 at 5:02 p.m.
#4
Future Norris guy
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 15,605
Likes: 8,625
Quoting: Shaun80
Only 6 of the pieces out of edmonton are for tanev and debrusk, 2nd and a prospect for each player. 4ths for the retention on each. Campbell isn't a piece, he comes with a 1st round pick to get his contract off the books. The 1st and 3rd were for ullmark. And ceci is just a cap casualty.


Right so the other 5 pieces are to move Jack Campbells contract, That's even more laugh Because no sane GM would ever make that offer.
Feb. 6 at 5:04 p.m.
#5
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 21,432
Likes: 7,074
it's just not even close for boston. a 1st and lohrei for hanifin isn't a real world concept.
i doubt moving debrusk is on their list either. just no need for it. overall, it just really doesn't make any sense for boston.
Feb. 6 at 5:04 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2023
Posts: 1,407
Likes: 568
Quoting: MoSeider53
Right so the other 5 pieces are to move Jack Campbells contract, That's even more laugh Because no sane GM would ever make that offer.


1st and 3rd for ullmark. That leaves 2 pieces to move Campbell, Campbell doesn't count as a piece to get rid of his contract.
Feb. 6 at 5:05 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2019
Posts: 1,726
Likes: 535
This is unrealistic, too many moving parts.
Feb. 6 at 5:06 p.m.
#8
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2023
Posts: 1,407
Likes: 568
Quoting: Bcarlo25
it's just not even close for boston. a 1st and lohrei for hanifin isn't a real world concept.
i doubt moving debrusk is on their list either. just no need for it. overall, it just really doesn't make any sense for boston.


Boston upgrades with sharngovich over debrusk, hanifan upgrades their top 4. They clear a few million in cap space and still have grz or forbort as trade chips to make any other upgrades.
Feb. 6 at 5:08 p.m.
#9
Future Norris guy
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 15,605
Likes: 8,625
Quoting: Shaun80
1st and 3rd for ullmark. That leaves 2 pieces to move Campbell, Campbell doesn't count as a piece to get rid of his contract.


Linus Ullmark doesn't waive for Canada, That's already been reported making your trade here pretty moot.
Feb. 6 at 5:09 p.m.
#10
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 21,432
Likes: 7,074
Quoting: Shaun80
Boston upgrades with sharngovich over debrusk, hanifan upgrades their top 4. They clear a few million in cap space and still have grz or forbort as trade chips to make any other upgrades.


I doubt they would view it as an upgrade over debrusk. You can't just look at raw points here. Boston values a particular style of play. It's why they're good.

I also doubt they have much interest in moving Ullmark, and I really doubt Ullmark has interest in going to Calgary.
Feb. 6 at 5:09 p.m.
#11
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2023
Posts: 1,407
Likes: 568
Quoting: MoSeider53
Linus Ullmark doesn't waive for Canada, That's already been reported making your trade here pretty moot.


I've never heard that before, but yeah see that pointed out here.
Feb. 6 at 5:10 p.m.
#12
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2023
Posts: 1,407
Likes: 568
Quoting: Bcarlo25
I doubt they would view it as an upgrade over debrusk. You can't just look at raw points here. Boston values a particular style of play. It's why they're good.

I also doubt they have much interest in moving Ullmark, and I really doubt Ullmark has interest in going to Calgary.


Ullmark goes to the oilers
Feb. 6 at 5:12 p.m.
#13
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 21,432
Likes: 7,074
Quoting: Shaun80
Ullmark goes to the oilers


oh....i REALLY doubt Ullmark has any interest in going to edmonton.
Feb. 6 at 5:15 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 1,272
Likes: 734
You’d have to take out the goalies for Boston to consider this
Feb. 6 at 5:15 p.m.
#15
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2023
Posts: 1,407
Likes: 568
Quoting: Bcarlo25
oh....i REALLY doubt Ullmark has any interest in going to edmonton.


Yeah, I see that in a few comments on here, didn't know he had no interest in going to Canada.
Feb. 6 at 5:18 p.m.
#16
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 21,432
Likes: 7,074
Quoting: Shaun80
Yeah, I see that in a few comments on here, didn't know he had no interest in going to Canada.


that's the case with most players that have trade protection.
Feb. 6 at 5:24 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 24,162
Likes: 7,791
Quoting: Shaun80
1st and 3rd for ullmark. That leaves 2 pieces to move Campbell, Campbell doesn't count as a piece to get rid of his contract.

Why does Edmonton want to spend a 1st + 3rd on Ullmark though? He'd be their backup.
Feb. 6 at 5:31 p.m.
#18
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2023
Posts: 1,407
Likes: 568
Quoting: CD282
Why does Edmonton want to spend a 1st + 3rd on Ullmark though? He'd be their backup.


I think he'd be their 1A. Skinner been playing great lately, but I still think ullmark is an upgrade.
Feb. 6 at 5:37 p.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 24,162
Likes: 7,791
Quoting: Shaun80
I think he'd be their 1A. Skinner been playing great lately, but I still think ullmark is an upgrade.

Skinner is their starter, whether you like it or not. They simply aren't going to be spending ridiculous assets on a goalie due to the confidence they have in Skinner. Those assets can be used to fill in other holes in the lineup.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll