SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

24-25 Revamped

Created by: glaive
Team: 2024-25 San Jose Sharks
Initial Creation Date: Mar. 11, 2024
Published: Mar. 11, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$2,500,000
2$825,000
2$2,500,000
1$3,000,000
1$900,000
1$2,500,000
1$1,500,000
1$1,125,000
Trades
1.
SJS
  1. 2025 5th round pick (EDM)
Additional Details:
Anywhere that wants a RD
2.
SJS
  1. Johansen, Ryan
  2. 2024 3rd round pick (PHI)
PHI
    Does SJS take cap dumps to add more picks?

    Team will have an ungodly amount of cap
    3.
    SJS
    1. Dvorak, Christian
    2. 2024 3rd round pick (MTL)
    MTL
    Buyouts
    Retained Salary Transactions
    Buried
    DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
    2024
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the PIT
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the NJD
    Logo of the TBL
    Logo of the PHI
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the VGK
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the PIT
    Logo of the SJS
    2025
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the VGK
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the WPG
    Logo of the EDM
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the NJD
    2026
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the SJS
    ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
    21$87,700,000$68,312,500$0$850,000$19,387,500
    Left WingCentreRight Wing
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
    LW
    RFA - 2
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $5,000,000$5,000,000
    C, RW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $1,450,000$1,450,000
    RW
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $1,500,000$1,500,000
    RW, LW
    RFA
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $1,125,000$1,125,000
    C, LW
    RFA
    Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
    $4,000,000$4,000,000
    C, RW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $2,000,000$2,000,000
    LW, RW
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $4,450,000$4,450,000
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $3,000,000$3,000,000
    RW, C
    RFA
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $900,000$900,000
    LW, C
    RFA
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $2,000,000$2,000,000
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $800,000$800,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 1
    Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $3,250,000$3,250,000
    LD
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $2,500,000$2,500,000
    RD
    RFA
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $2,350,000$2,350,000
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $7,000,000$7,000,000
    LD/RD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $2,500,000$2,500,000
    RD
    RFA
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $3,400,000$3,400,000
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $2,500,000$2,500,000
    LD
    RFA
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $1,250,000$1,250,000
    RD
    UFA - 2
    ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $1,100,000$1,100,000
    LD/RD
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $8,000,000$8,000,000
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3

    Embed Code

    • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
    • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

    Text-Embed

    Click to Highlight
    Mar. 11 at 7:37 p.m.
    #1
    Stovetop
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2017
    Posts: 1,976
    Likes: 864
    I don't want cap dumps taking young players spots tbh. a 3rd isn't much to take on RyJo
    Mar. 11 at 7:39 p.m.
    #2
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Oct. 2020
    Posts: 49
    Likes: 13
    Habs don’t need cap space so they wouldn’t give up a 3rd to dump Dvorak. Dvorak at the TDL with salary retained isn’t a negative asset. He would be a pretty good 4th liner on a contending team that gives that team center depth and PK depth. I could see Dvorak return at the TDL a 4th for the Habs and 5th for whoever retains 50% of his cap.
    Burnout liked this.
    Mar. 11 at 7:46 p.m.
    #3
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Nov. 2021
    Posts: 1,563
    Likes: 695
    Quoting: AStovetop
    I don't want cap dumps taking young players spots tbh. a 3rd isn't much to take on RyJo


    It's only a season and in the worst case you just waive him. I see 30-40m in cap space as free real estate. Get more picks
    Mar. 11 at 8:03 p.m.
    #4
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Nov. 2021
    Posts: 1,563
    Likes: 695
    Quoting: BubbleGumPlant
    Habs don’t need cap space so they wouldn’t give up a 3rd to dump Dvorak. Dvorak at the TDL with salary retained isn’t a negative asset. He would be a pretty good 4th liner on a contending team that gives that team center depth and PK depth. I could see Dvorak return at the TDL a 4th for the Habs and 5th for whoever retains 50% of his cap.


    Unless he pulls up his socks 4.4m is a hell of a lot for a dude with 4th line production, even if you retain.

    If they aren't pressed to move him, all good. Can't see him being worth anything though.
    Mar. 11 at 9:25 p.m.
    #5
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2019
    Posts: 1,916
    Likes: 725
    Curious, where is this "revamp"? : P
    Mar. 11 at 9:27 p.m.
    #6
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Feb. 2021
    Posts: 1,036
    Likes: 518
    Quoting: AStovetop
    I don't want cap dumps taking young players spots tbh. a 3rd isn't much to take on RyJo


    do you think we legit just play all young guys?
    Mar. 11 at 9:31 p.m.
    #7
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Nov. 2021
    Posts: 1,563
    Likes: 695
    Quoting: mvp13
    Curious, where is this "revamp"? : P


    Revamped the last one i did
    mvp13 liked this.
    Mar. 11 at 9:39 p.m.
    #8
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Mar. 2022
    Posts: 669
    Likes: 235
    flyers aren't gonna pay to move johansen
    Mar. 12 at 11:37 a.m.
    #9
    Stovetop
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2017
    Posts: 1,976
    Likes: 864
    Quoting: Letsgosharks
    do you think we legit just play all young guys?


    No I'd rather sign Free Agents who can actually contribute to fill any holes that the young guys can't. But I don't want to see another scenario where players like Bordeleau and Thrun get sent down because their not able to be claimed on waivers, while guys like Hoffman and Labanc are still up with the big club
    Mar. 12 at 11:43 a.m.
    #10
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Nov. 2021
    Posts: 1,563
    Likes: 695
    Quoting: AStovetop
    No I'd rather sign Free Agents who can actually contribute to fill any holes that the young guys can't. But I don't want to see another scenario where players like Bordeleau and Thrun get sent down because their not able to be claimed on waivers, while guys like Hoffman and Labanc are still up with the big club


    That’s why I traded for cap dumps and acquired picks with them. Just stop gaps for a year until the young guys are ready
    Mar. 12 at 11:50 a.m.
    #11
    Stovetop
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2017
    Posts: 1,976
    Likes: 864
    Quoting: glaive
    That’s why I traded for cap dumps and acquired picks with them. Just stop gaps for a year until the young guys are ready


    Yeah I'm saying i'm not a fan of that. They had to take on those guys to move Karlsson, but now they can really start to inject the new guys. Gushchin, Bords, Thrun, and Shakir I think should be full time NHLers. I'd rather swing big on a good UFA with short term than to take on a negative value player for a meh pick.
    Mar. 12 at 11:53 a.m.
    #12
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Nov. 2021
    Posts: 1,563
    Likes: 695
    Edited Mar. 12 at 12:01 p.m.
    Quoting: AStovetop
    Yeah I'm saying i'm not a fan of that. They had to take on those guys to move Karlsson, but now they can really start to inject the new guys. Gushchin, Bords, Thrun, and Shakir I think should be full time NHLers. I'd rather swing big on a good UFA with short term than to take on a negative value player for a meh pick.


    If you have 30-40m in cap space why not take on bad contracts for picks?

    None of those prospects aside from Shakir, Thrun, and Bordeleau should be full time NHL’ers, and I have 2 of those in the lineup
    Mar. 12 at 12:45 p.m.
    #13
    Stovetop
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2017
    Posts: 1,976
    Likes: 864
    Quoting: glaive
    If you have 30-40m in cap space why not take on bad contracts for picks?

    None of those prospects aside from Shakir, Thrun, and Bordeleau should be full time NHL’ers, and I have 2 of those in the lineup


    Musty very well could make it. Thompson should be right there on the Right side. I think Smith should go back another year but if he bulks up in the summer I could see him making it. If they luck into getting Celebrini, he's NHL ready, skill and physicality wise. And there are better players
    Mar. 12 at 1:09 p.m.
    #14
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Feb. 2021
    Posts: 1,036
    Likes: 518
    Quoting: AStovetop
    No I'd rather sign Free Agents who can actually contribute to fill any holes that the young guys can't. But I don't want to see another scenario where players like Bordeleau and Thrun get sent down because their not able to be claimed on waivers, while guys like Hoffman and Labanc are still up with the big club


    Yeah there’s a happy medium
     
    Reply
    To create a post please Login or Register
    Question:
    Options:
    Add Option
    Submit Poll