SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

NHL Draft Trading Up

Created by: Renegade_H
Team: 2024-25 Philadelphia Flyers
Initial Creation Date: Apr. 8, 2024
Published: Apr. 10, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
The Athletic Corey Pronman lists OTT as 31st in Team Prospect rankings. While drafting at 7 and getting someone to help immediately could be a play, I personally think OTT would think about 12 and 26 (currently) to restock the cabinet.

Flyers need to secure one of Catton, Lindstrom, or Eiserman. If they are all taken, I'd have to think Dickinson or Parekh would be a target.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$1,800,000
2$1,100,000
2$1,100,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$1,850,000
CREATEDYEARSCAP HIT
Catton, Berkly
3$975,000
Trades
1.
PHI
  1. 2024 1st round pick (OTT)
OTT
  1. 2024 1st round pick (FLA)
  2. 2024 1st round pick (PHI)
2.
PHI
  1. 2025 2nd round pick (CBJ)
CBJ
  1. 2024 2nd round pick (CBJ)
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the STL
Logo of the PHI
2025
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the COL
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the PHI
2026
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the PHI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$87,500,000$84,008,928$245,000$0$3,491,072
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$7,750,000$7,750,000
C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$6,200,000$6,200,000
RW, LW
UFA - 8
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$5,500,000$5,500,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$2,100,000$2,100,000
C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$1,800,000$1,800,000
RW
RFA
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$2,625,000$2,625,000
C, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$3,000,000$3,000,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$863,333$863,333
RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$1,750,000$1,750,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$1,900,000$1,900,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$2,375,000$2,375,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$787,500$787,500
RW
RFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$6,250,000$6,250,000
LD/RD
NTC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$2,300,000$2,300,000
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$1,450,000$1,450,000
G
RFA - 2
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$1,600,000$1,600,000
LD/RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$850,000$850,000
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$1,850,000$1,850,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$2,700,000$2,700,000
LD/RD
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$1,100,000$1,100,000
LD/RD
RFA
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$1,100,000$1,100,000
LD
RFA
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$5,875,000$5,875,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$5,100,000$5,100,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$6,250,000$6,250,000
RD
UFA - 3

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Apr. 10 at 11:43 a.m.
#1
Danny B is here
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2023
Posts: 5,063
Likes: 1,969
Trading up only 5 spots like that I wouldn’t wanna give both of our 1sts or at least make it the 2025 Colorado instead of 2024 Florida. Personally if I’m trading both 1sts, I’m throwing in the CBJ 2nd and moving into the top 5. It feels like a waste to move up only 5 spots personally but maybe that’s the true value unfortunately I guess we will see how stingy GMs are lol. It would also make me feel better about doing this trade you have above if we get another 1st from Laughton somehow. I feel like we really need to pick twice in this 1st round to get a good center and good RHD or go real high up to get a top center.

I want Iginla and Jiricek if possible or one of Demidov/Catton if moving up
Apr. 10 at 11:44 a.m.
#2
EuroTrash Hockey Vet
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2021
Posts: 762
Likes: 370
It depends on who is available at 7; if Parekh is there, Ottawa isn't trading out of it.
Apr. 10 at 11:47 a.m.
#3
sensonfire
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2021
Posts: 11,894
Likes: 4,466
Ottawa accepts if both Levshunov and Parekh are gone when it is our turn to pick at #7.

Ottawa declines if either Levshunov or Parekh are still available at #7.
Apr. 10 at 11:49 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2024
Posts: 226
Likes: 99
Honestly, between the fact that the Flyers should be going BPA with their top pick regardless of what happens and the fact that the gap between the 3rd and 13th best prospect in this class is small, I'm not sure this makes a ton of sense for Philly
squashmaple and GMDannyB liked this.
Apr. 10 at 11:53 a.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Flyers
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2023
Posts: 543
Likes: 241
2025 draft is really deep from what I hear. I am holding onto that COL 1st even if its super late.

Flyers desperately need a 1C and I dont see FA being an option. I based moving 5 up based upon a draft pick value chart I found online plus historical trades. It'll cost the FLA pick to move into top 7.
GMDannyB liked this.
Apr. 10 at 11:54 a.m.
#6
Danny B is here
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2023
Posts: 5,063
Likes: 1,969
Quoting: SpiderSpiderSpider28
Honestly, between the fact that the Flyers should be going BPA with their top pick regardless of what happens and the fact that the gap between the 3rd and 13th best prospect in this class is small, I'm not sure this makes a ton of sense for Philly


Agreed like I said above if I’m going from 12-13 and moving up I’m going to like 5 if someone in the proposed top 4 drops out otherwise stay where you are and go BPA
Apr. 10 at 11:55 a.m.
#7
Danny B is here
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2023
Posts: 5,063
Likes: 1,969
Quoting: Renegade_H
2025 draft is really deep from what I hear. I am holding onto that COL 1st even if its super late.

Flyers desperately need a 1C and I dont see FA being an option. I based moving 5 up based upon a draft pick value chart I found online plus historical trades. It'll cost the FLA pick to move into top 7.


Fair enough, like I said I’m only comfortable doing that if we get another 1st this year somehow then. Too many RHD to pass up on in this draft. So if you are going center with the 1st pick you have to get another one to take a RHD.
Apr. 10 at 12:02 p.m.
#8
Thread Starter
Flyers
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2023
Posts: 543
Likes: 241
Quoting: GMDannyB
Fair enough, like I said I’m only comfortable doing that if we get another 1st this year somehow then. Too many RHD to pass up on in this draft. So if you are going center with the 1st pick you have to get another one to take a RHD.


Im not eyeing RD at all unless its Parekh or Yakemchuk. Maybe Mews if I hold onto 26. IMO, we just need to be all in on a top C who can be paired with Michkov for awhile.
Apr. 10 at 12:08 p.m.
#9
Danny B is here
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2023
Posts: 5,063
Likes: 1,969
Quoting: Renegade_H
Im not eyeing RD at all unless its Parekh or Yakemchuk. Maybe Mews if I hold onto 26. IMO, we just need to be all in on a top C who can be paired with Michkov for awhile.


I mean realistically we need both that’s what I’m trying to say lol. Center is the more pressing need realistically we need a 1C and a 2C but I still think we need a 1RHD. I think Drysdale and Bonk will both top as 2RHD.
Apr. 10 at 12:14 p.m.
#10
Thread Starter
Flyers
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2023
Posts: 543
Likes: 241
Quoting: GMDannyB
I mean realistically we need both that’s what I’m trying to say lol. Center is the more pressing need realistically we need a 1C and a 2C but I still think we need a 1RHD. I think Drysdale and Bonk will both top as 2RHD.


I get that. I would rather find someone to take on Risto and give Montour a ridiculous contract.

Sanheim - Montour
York - Drysdale
Seeler - Bonk
Apr. 10 at 12:16 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2020
Posts: 2,034
Likes: 1,214
Quoting: GMDannyB
I mean realistically we need both that’s what I’m trying to say lol. Center is the more pressing need realistically we need a 1C and a 2C but I still think we need a 1RHD. I think Drysdale and Bonk will both top as 2RHD.


I wouldn't worry too much about Drysdale, but if he doesn't show signs of improving next year, then I would start looking at RD in the draft. If Drysdale doesn't become a 1RD for us then we got absolutely shafted in the Gauthier trade lol.
GMDannyB liked this.
Apr. 10 at 12:20 p.m.
#12
Danny B is here
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2023
Posts: 5,063
Likes: 1,969
Quoting: Roperttos
I wouldn't worry too much about Drysdale, but if he doesn't show signs of improving next year, then I would start looking at RD in the draft. If Drysdale doesn't become a 1RD for us then we got absolutely shafted in the Gauthier trade lol.


I don’t think we have a #1 D-man in the Org. I think York is a good 2, Sanheim a good 3, and Drysdale could be a strong 2 but we still need a #1 Big Physical take over the game d man
Apr. 10 at 12:21 p.m.
#13
Danny B is here
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2023
Posts: 5,063
Likes: 1,969
Quoting: Renegade_H
I get that. I would rather find someone to take on Risto and give Montour a ridiculous contract.

Sanheim - Montour
York - Drysdale
Seeler - Bonk


Not a fan of that personally. I think this blue line needs a big physical player. York Sanheim Drysdale Bonk are all seemingly the similar play style as Montour even tho not as good. I think his numbers are inflated on Florida. We want a version of Risto that can actually play hockey lol
Apr. 10 at 12:22 p.m.
#14
Thread Starter
Flyers
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2023
Posts: 543
Likes: 241
Quoting: Roperttos
I wouldn't worry too much about Drysdale, but if he doesn't show signs of improving next year, then I would start looking at RD in the draft. If Drysdale doesn't become a 1RD for us then we got absolutely shafted in the Gauthier trade lol.


That still pisses me off.
Apr. 10 at 12:26 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2020
Posts: 2,034
Likes: 1,214
Quoting: GMDannyB
I don’t think we have a #1 D-man in the Org. I think York is a good 2, Sanheim a good 3, and Drysdale could be a strong 2 but we still need a #1 Big Physical take over the game d man


Then the question becomes how can we get a player like that? Levshunov would fit that description but he is going in the top 5 likely. Yakemchuk is another D who comes to mind and would be more likely available for them, but does he have the potential to be a 1RD?
Apr. 10 at 12:27 p.m.
#16
Danny B is here
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2023
Posts: 5,063
Likes: 1,969
Quoting: Roperttos
Then the question becomes how can we get a player like that? Levshunov would fit that description but he is going in the top 5 likely. Yakemchuk is another D who comes to mind and would be more likely available for them, but does he have the potential to be a 1RD?


Well that’s what I’m saying tho. If we are trading up for anything I’m trading into the top 5 and taking a top Center or top RHD.
Roperttos liked this.
Apr. 10 at 12:33 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2020
Posts: 2,034
Likes: 1,214
Quoting: Renegade_H
That still pisses me off.


At the 2022 draft when they drafted Gauthier, I thought they should have gone with Jiricek and oh boy would that be a better pick looking back at it now.
Who_is_Jimmy_Stu liked this.
Apr. 10 at 12:36 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2020
Posts: 2,034
Likes: 1,214
Quoting: GMDannyB
Well that’s what I’m saying tho. If we are trading up for anything I’m trading into the top 5 and taking a top Center or top RHD.


If we got a top pick and you had the choice between Catton or Lindstrom, which one are you taking?
Apr. 10 at 12:39 p.m.
#19
not a he )
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2022
Posts: 3,231
Likes: 4,406
Quoting: Roperttos
At the 2022 draft when they drafted Gauthier, I thought they should have gone with Jiricek and oh boy would that be a better pick looking back at it now.


You should have heard the cheers at the Columbus draft party when your guy said Gauthier (sorry, don't recall if it was Fletcher who actually said the name or not). We were 100% sure the Flyers would take Jiricek.
GMDannyB liked this.
Apr. 10 at 12:43 p.m.
#20
Danny B is here
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2023
Posts: 5,063
Likes: 1,969
Quoting: Roperttos
At the 2022 draft when they drafted Gauthier, I thought they should have gone with Jiricek and oh boy would that be a better pick looking back at it now.


I wanted Slaf for months when he was projected to go 5-7 and then a month before all of the sudden he was the top pick and then I shifted to Jiricek. I said the same thing when they drafted Cutter that it was a mistake not to go Jiricek. Two totally different reasons between why and what happened but same outcome
Roperttos liked this.
Apr. 10 at 12:43 p.m.
#21
Danny B is here
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2023
Posts: 5,063
Likes: 1,969
Quoting: Roperttos
If we got a top pick and you had the choice between Catton or Lindstrom, which one are you taking?


Catton. Center is the highest priority.
Roperttos liked this.
Apr. 10 at 12:44 p.m.
#22
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2020
Posts: 2,034
Likes: 1,214
Edited Apr. 10 at 12:52 p.m.
Quoting: squashmaple
You should have heard the cheers at the Columbus draft party when your guy said Gauthier (sorry, don't recall if it was Fletcher who actually said the name or not). We were 100% sure the Flyers would take Jiricek.


It wasn't Fletcher who announced the pick, but some girl who was with them. It made too much sense to pick Jiricek back then so I guess Fletchers brain short circuited due to the amount of logic and went with Gauthier instead lol.
GMDannyB and squashmaple liked this.
Apr. 10 at 12:53 p.m.
#23
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2020
Posts: 2,034
Likes: 1,214
Quoting: GMDannyB
Catton. Center is the highest priority.


Lindstrom is really intriguing option, but Catton probably has the better offensive ceiling compared to him.
GMDannyB liked this.
Apr. 10 at 1:15 p.m.
#24
Danny B is here
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2023
Posts: 5,063
Likes: 1,969
Quoting: Roperttos
Lindstrom is really intriguing option, but Catton probably has the better offensive ceiling compared to him.


Sorry got him mixed up with Levshunov. I would think long and hard about Lindstrom if he is available. Would be a hard choice between him and Catton
Roperttos liked this.
Apr. 10 at 1:28 p.m.
#25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 5,903
Likes: 1,537
OTT declines
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll