SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

I believe in PLD

Created by: Thommey
Team: 2024-25 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: May 18, 2024
Published: May 18, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$1,150,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
5$3,750,000
7$7,750,000
5$4,750,000
4$3,750,000
2$2,250,000
Trades
1.
2.
TOR
LAK
  1. Järnkrok, Calle
  2. Kämpf, David
Additional Details:
anywhere
3.
TOR
  1. 2024 3rd round pick (NYI)
  2. 2024 3rd round pick (BOS)
WSH
  1. Liljegren, Timothy [RFA Rights]
  2. Robertson, Nicholas [RFA Rights]
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the OTT
2025
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
2026
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$87,700,000$87,209,667$0$850,000$490,333
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$925,000$925,000
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$13,250,000$13,250,000
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,750,000$3,750,000
C, RW
UFA
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,350,000$1,350,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
$7,750,000$7,750,000
C, RW
UFA
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,500,000$11,500,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$904,667$904,667
LW, C
RFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,000,000$11,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$8,500,000$8,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,150,000$1,150,000
LW, C
RFA
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$800,000$800,000
C, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,350,000$1,350,000
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$875,000$875,000
RW
RFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
$4,750,000$4,750,000
RD
UFA
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$766,667$766,667
G
RFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$7,500,000$7,500,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,250,000$2,250,000
RD
UFA
$3,750,000$3,750,000
G
UFA
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,350,000$1,350,000
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$875,000$875,000
LD
RFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
May 18 at 6:09 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 39,617
Likes: 20,406
Sure you do, but Clarke isn't getting traded
BruinsWoahWoah and OldNYIfan liked this.
May 18 at 6:27 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 20,127
Likes: 7,497
Not even PLD's mom believes in PLD
May 18 at 6:31 p.m.
#3
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 41,649
Likes: 26,367
1. Los Angeles can't afford Mitch Marner in 2024-2025, especially since this trade ADDS about $2.4 million in cap to an already cap-stressed team.

2. Los Angeles doesn't need another top-2 RW with Adrian Kempe and Kevin Fiala there and Quinton Byfield and Trevor Moore at LW. Marner is an unaffordable upgrade at a position where we're fine.

3. Los Angeles can't afford Mitch Marner in 2025-2026 and thereafter.

4. Los Angeles can't afford to trade Brandt Clarke because there's no internal replacement for him.

5. As usual, this Marner trade only makes sense for the Maple Leafs. It's much harder than it seems to construct a trade that benefits the other team at a reasonable cost.
May 18 at 6:46 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 20,127
Likes: 7,497
Quoting: OldNYIfan
1. Los Angeles can't afford Mitch Marner in 2024-2025, especially since this trade ADDS about $2.4 million in cap to an already cap-stressed team.

2. Los Angeles doesn't need another top-2 RW with Adrian Kempe and Kevin Fiala there and Quinton Byfield and Trevor Moore at LW. Marner is an unaffordable upgrade at a position where we're fine.

3. Los Angeles can't afford Mitch Marner in 2025-2026 and thereafter.

4. Los Angeles can't afford to trade Brandt Clarke because there's no internal replacement for him.

5. As usual, this Marner trade only makes sense for the Maple Leafs. It's much harder than it seems to construct a trade that benefits the other team at a reasonable cost.


That trade in no way benefits the leafs
May 18 at 6:59 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 840
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
That trade in no way benefits the leafs


Every trade you see by another poster makes no sense for Toronto. Yet you never post any trades yourself..
OldNYIfan liked this.
May 18 at 7:03 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 20,127
Likes: 7,497
Quoting: Ryminister_92
Every trade you see by another poster makes no sense for Toronto. Yet you never post any trades yourself..


Every trade you post is horrible and yet you think me posting trades means anything....
May 18 at 7:13 p.m.
#7
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 41,649
Likes: 26,367
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
That trade in no way benefits the leafs

Your usual homerism mixed with an abject lack of insight.
1. Toronto gets out of the 2024-2025 burden of Marner's cap hit and the even bigger burden of Marner's extension, which would cost more than Nylander's.
2. Toronto gets a defense prospect with the upside of Reilly who's only 21 years old and light years better than any defense prospect in the Toronto pipeline.
Ryminister_92 liked this.
May 18 at 7:17 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 20,127
Likes: 7,497
Quoting: OldNYIfan
Your usual homerism mixed with an abject lack of insight.
1. Toronto gets out of the 2024-2025 burden of Marner's cap hit and the even bigger burden of Marner's extension, which would cost more than Nylander's.
2. Toronto gets a defense prospect with the upside of Reilly who's only 21 years old and light years better than any defense prospect in the Toronto pipeline.


Except that PLD's contract is an absolute boat anchor and more a burden than anything marner has now or will get and the combined difference between him and marner and that horrible deal is more than clarke.
May 18 at 7:23 p.m.
#9
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 41,649
Likes: 26,367
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
Except that PLD's contract is an absolute boat anchor and more a burden than anything marner has now or will get and the combined difference between him and marner and that horrible deal is more than clarke.

And so now you want to be intellectually dishonest by moving the goalposts.

Your original statement was the absolute "That trade in no way benefits the leafs." "No way." Now you want to shrink backwards to "that trade is bad for the Leafs because they don't get enough value."

Why don't you try to surprise us all, including @Ryminister_92, by occasionally making an intellectually honest, non-homer comment?
May 18 at 7:29 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 20,127
Likes: 7,497
Quoting: OldNYIfan
And so now you want to be intellectually dishonest by moving the goalposts.

Your original statement was the absolute "That trade in no way benefits the leafs." "No way." Now you want to shrink backwards to "that trade is bad for the Leafs because they don't get enough value."

Why don't you try to surprise us all, including Ryminister_92, by occasionally making an intellectually honest, non-homer comment?


Lol, wow that's such a strech it might as well be advanced yoga
So yea, about that "this in no way benefits the leafs". It is very simple, when you massively downgrade from one player to another and take on a much worse contract and the additional pieces do not come close to making it worth it, the trade does not benefit your team in any way

So why dont you surprise us all by not trying for gotcha points with people who make some if the most awful leafs trades on the site
May 18 at 7:43 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 840
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
Every trade you post is horrible and yet you think me posting trades means anything....


Just find it hysterical how you can judge everyone else’s post so poorly but can’t man up and take any criticism or make any posts yourself. Seems real mature.
May 18 at 7:44 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 840
Quoting: OldNYIfan
And so now you want to be intellectually dishonest by moving the goalposts.

Your original statement was the absolute "That trade in no way benefits the leafs." "No way." Now you want to shrink backwards to "that trade is bad for the Leafs because they don't get enough value."

Why don't you try to surprise us all, including Ryminister_92, by occasionally making an intellectually honest, non-homer comment?


1. Good luck getting that kid to say anything non-bias. It’s not worth your breathe to argue with him.

2. How’d I get pulled into your discussion with him?
OldNYIfan liked this.
May 18 at 7:47 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 20,127
Likes: 7,497
Quoting: Ryminister_92
Just find it hysterical how you can judge everyone else’s post so poorly but can’t man up and take any criticism or make any posts yourself. Seems real mature.


I find it hysterical that you think that matters, it's almost as funny as your own trades
May 18 at 7:48 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 840
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
I find it hysterical that you think that matters, it's almost as funny as your own trades


Wow. Your immaturity is through the roof kid.
May 18 at 7:50 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 20,127
Likes: 7,497
Quoting: Ryminister_92
Wow. Your immaturity is through the roof kid.


Dude, the amount of insults you've thrown at me and the way you get all gossipy about me with other posters and you're calling me immature? Incredible stuff.
May 18 at 7:53 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 840
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
Dude, the amount of insults you've thrown at me and the way you get all gossipy about me with other posters and you're calling me immature? Incredible stuff.


I haven’t thrown one insult your way this entire conversation yet you act the same as you always have..
OldNYIfan liked this.
May 18 at 7:55 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 20,127
Likes: 7,497
Quoting: Ryminister_92
I haven’t thrown one insult your way this entire conversation yet you act the same as you always have..


Yeah, it's almost like i can remember previous conversations where you got so big mad that someone didn't like your bad trades that you were throwing insults out every single post like a 12 year old playing xbox.
Good effort champ, good try.
May 18 at 7:56 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 840
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
Yeah, it's almost like i can remember previous conversations where you got so big mad that someone didn't like your bad trades that you were throwing insults out every single post like a 12 year old playing xbox.
Good effort champ, good try.


🤣

I’ve never been mad once on this site for someone not liking my trade ideas. I couldn’t care less.. it’s a forum that’s meant for opinions.

But good to know you think about me often 😉
May 18 at 7:57 p.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 840
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
Yeah, it's almost like i can remember previous conversations where you got so big mad that someone didn't like your bad trades that you were throwing insults out every single post like a 12 year old playing xbox.
Good effort champ, good try.


& yet again you’re the one reverting to insulting when I haven’t insulted you once during this conversation..
At least you’re consistently the same person every time 😂
May 18 at 8:00 p.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 20,127
Likes: 7,497
Quoting: Ryminister_92
& yet again you’re the one reverting to insulting when I haven’t insulted you once during this conversation..
At least you’re consistently the same person every time 😂


It's cute how you think adding 'during this conversation' means anything. Dude, if youve been an immature tantrum throwing child 9 times out of 10, guess what, that one time doesnt change it
May 18 at 8:01 p.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 840
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
It's cute how you think adding 'during this conversation' means anything. Dude, if youve been an immature tantrum throwing child 9 times out of 10, guess what, that one time doesnt change it


lol. Ok kid. Whatever you say! 😉
May 18 at 8:10 p.m.
#22
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 20,127
Likes: 7,497
Quoting: Ryminister_92
lol. Ok kid. Whatever you say! 😉


Thanks hoss
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll