SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Mock-Draft

The absolutely guaranteed mockery of a draft. This will happen.......

The absolutely guaranteed mockery of a draft. This will happen.......

Draft Class: 2024
Created By: hockeynutter
Published: May 22 at 2:00 p.m.
May 22 at 2:35 p.m.
#1
Flyers
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2023
Posts: 786
Likes: 336
A+ draft for Flyers, although I think Philly fans are too sensitive to handle drafting Connelly.
May 22 at 3:26 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 11,658
Likes: 4,898
Sharks would easily be D- after Celebrini. Sharks biggest needs are RD and size and you have them drafting 2 smaller LD and a smaller C
May 22 at 5:05 p.m.
#3
Benoit for Norris
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 508
Likes: 170
Kiviharju at 14 is insane probably mid second round
May 22 at 5:07 p.m.
#4
Benoit for Norris
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 508
Likes: 170
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
Sharks would easily be D- after Celebrini. Sharks biggest needs are RD and size and you have them drafting 2 smaller LD and a smaller C


Colton Roberts I think is the one for sharks or maybe Charlie Elick if he falls to them at 33
Rob32sjsharks liked this.
May 22 at 6:12 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 11,658
Likes: 4,898
Quoting: carter_mackenzie24
Colton Roberts I think is the one for sharks or maybe Charlie Elick if he falls to them at 33


I’m eyeing Badinka and Pulkkinen for the 33 & 42 picks myself.
carter_mackenzie24 liked this.
May 22 at 7:01 p.m.
#6
Benoit for Norris
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 508
Likes: 170
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
I’m eyeing Badinka and Pulkkinen for the 33 & 42 picks myself.


Yeah true those would be a lot better Roberts is big but yeah those are definitely better options
May 22 at 7:27 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 11,658
Likes: 4,898
Quoting: carter_mackenzie24
Yeah true those would be a lot better Roberts is big but yeah those are definitely better options


They may not be better, but for me inn2nd round or later I focus on finding quality depth with upside and both are big, defensively solid, skate well for their size, and have some offensive upside. They look to me to have a #3 D ceiling and 6/7D floor and that’s a pretty good option in the 2nd round of a weaker draft.
carter_mackenzie24 liked this.
May 22 at 10:27 p.m.
#8
Benoit for Norris
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 508
Likes: 170
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
They may not be better, but for me inn2nd round or later I focus on finding quality depth with upside and both are big, defensively solid, skate well for their size, and have some offensive upside. They look to me to have a #3 D ceiling and 6/7D floor and that’s a pretty good option in the 2nd round of a weaker draft.


For sure
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll