SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Montreal Canadiens Norman Flynn edition

Team: 2024-25 Montreal Canadiens
Initial Creation Date: May 26, 2024
Published: May 26, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
if you know you know, not serious
Free Agent Signings
CREATEDYEARSCAP HIT
Simmonds, Wayne
3$6,000,000
Trades
1.
2.
ANA
  1. 2024 1st round pick (MTL)
Additional Details:
5th OA pick
3.
4.
MTL
    Wayne Simmonds 3x6m
    Retained Salary Transactions
    DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
    2024
    Logo of the WPG
    Logo of the COL
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the MIN
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the EDM
    Logo of the WSH
    2025
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the CGY
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the PIT
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the NJD
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the DET
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the MTL
    2026
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the MTL
    ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
    20$87,700,000$71,805,417$1,022,500$3,670,000$15,894,583
    Left WingCentreRight Wing
    Logo of the New York Islanders
    $5,000,000$5,000,000
    RW, LW
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
    C, LW
    RFA - 1
    Simmonds, Wayne
    $6,000,000$6,000,000
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $1,100,000$1,100,000
    LW, RW
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
    $8,500,000$8,500,000
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 7
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $6,500,000$6,500,000
    RW, LW
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $812,500$812,500
    LW, RW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $4,450,000$4,450,000
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $5,500,000$5,500,000
    RW, LW
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $2,900,000$2,900,000
    C, LW
    RFA - 3
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $3,400,000$3,400,000
    RW, LW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $1,700,000$1,700,000
    C
    UFA - 1
    Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $4,875,000$4,875,000
    LD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $3,500,000$3,500,000
    RD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $3,150,000$3,150,000
    G
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $1,400,000$1,400,000
    LD/RD
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $766,667$766,667
    RD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $890,000$890,000
    G
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $950,000$950,000 (Performance Bonus$750,000$750K)
    LD
    RFA - 2
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$420,000$420K)
    LD/RD
    RFA - 1
    ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $3,362,500$3,362,500
    C, RW
    RFA - 2
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $10,500,000$10,500,000
    G
    NMC
    UFA - 2

    Embed Code

    • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
    • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

    Text-Embed

    Click to Highlight
    May 26 at 6:26 p.m.
    #1
    Jesus Christ Is King
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Mar. 2017
    Posts: 2,766
    Likes: 797
    Yikes
    I might do McTavish i guess
    But that'd be about it
    May 26 at 6:48 p.m.
    #2
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Nov. 2023
    Posts: 1,225
    Likes: 415
    book it!

    great acid trip
    aedoran liked this.
    May 26 at 6:51 p.m.
    #3
    Future Ducks legend
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2022
    Posts: 10,775
    Likes: 7,600
    Quoting: Billy316
    Yikes
    I might do McTavish i guess
    But that'd be about it


    You might, Anaheim wouldn't.
    May 26 at 6:59 p.m.
    #4
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2021
    Posts: 16,663
    Likes: 12,858
    Quoting: Billy316
    Yikes
    I might do McTavish i guess
    But that'd be about it


    You would all day long and we laugh about it all day long
    Billy316 and OldNYIfan liked this.
    May 26 at 7:17 p.m.
    #5
    Jesus Christ Is King
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Mar. 2017
    Posts: 2,766
    Likes: 797
    Quoting: GeneralLandro
    You would all day long and we laugh about it all day long


    Quoting: GiggywithGibby
    You might, Anaheim wouldn't.


    I stated what i meant in English i "MIGHT"
    I like McTavish too and i've been on the fence about this for a while as OldNYIFan can confirm
    Every Zegras trade i say there's 1 ANA player i might trade that top 5 for but that would have to be the day of the draft depending on who went top 3 before i'd make that call. But it comes down to who's available as McTavish is good but im not convinced he's better then Demidov or Lindstrom long term is where i struggle with this
    I mean if both are gone and its all D left or Catton or Eiserman or Iginla then sure ,i'd trade.
    But if Demidov or Lindstrom is there i dont know. As good as McTavish Truly is, and he is REALLY Good.
    Demidov and Lindstrom are too. Both fit MTL's needs and Hughes has expressed interests in both as well as Iginla.


    I get your side of it
    I wouldnt trade Suzuki for your 3rd OA
    Doesnt mean much outside i like Suzuki a lot
    Most people would at least consider a package built around it at the very least.
    I would not , and i suspect you're the same. No shame in it and its why Core Players arent moved often untill pushed out by youth

    I mean i get ANA POV as you've got Zegras to move for a good pick even if he wouldnt make me consider giving up a top 10 pick for him, i'd likely give up a top 15 as he has value. So why would ANA feel motivated to use McTavish even if your really really wanted two top 5 picks in this years draft, its counter productive like MTL moving Suzuki for a 3rd OA would be today. But if i were to even consider doing it McTavish is the only ANA pieces id be looking at is the context of my original statement essentially
    OldNYIfan liked this.
    May 26 at 8:22 p.m.
    #6
    You know nothing JS
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2017
    Posts: 7,172
    Likes: 4,518
    This is why I don't watch RDS network. Bunch of clowns who know nothing about scouting talent, or the other 31 other teams in general.
    May 26 at 8:52 p.m.
    #7
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Nov. 2018
    Posts: 892
    Likes: 502
    Quoting: jpsnow13
    This is why I don't watch RDS network. Bunch of clowns who know nothing about scouting talent, or the other 31 other teams in general.


    Pierre Houde is the goat and yeah the other analysts are clueless but I like to hear their bad takes especially Flynn's
    May 26 at 8:58 p.m.
    #8
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2019
    Posts: 109
    Likes: 22
    Quoting: What_Are_you_Drouin
    Pierre Houde is the goat and yeah the other analysts are clueless but I like to hear their bad takes especially Flynn's


    Imo Marc Denis is one of the best Color commentary guys on TV including both languages. Him and houde are a pleasure to listen to; and I’m an Anglo. I have no time for anyone else on RDS tho.
    May 26 at 9:01 p.m.
    #9
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2015
    Posts: 19,674
    Likes: 6,809
    Norman Flynn might be the worst taker I've ever seen. Out of touch and stuck in 1997.
    May 26 at 10:13 p.m.
    #10
    Jeff Gorton
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Oct. 2020
    Posts: 2,294
    Likes: 550
    Quoting: GiggywithGibby
    You might, Anaheim wouldn't.


    53 point pace at 21 isnt that crazy. idk what kind of delusion juice Ducks fans drink to think hes that good. hes comparable to Suzuki with much worse defence
    May 26 at 10:16 p.m.
    #11
    ht42
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2022
    Posts: 2,563
    Likes: 730
    Quoting: GiggywithGibby
    You might, Anaheim wouldn't.


    Quoting: GeneralLandro
    You would all day long and we laugh about it all day long


    The tittle is talking about a Montreal medias member who wanted to trade Suzuki for Simmonds at the 2019 TDL, Caufield for Palmeri at the 2021 TDL and Slafkovsky for Dubois last year.

    Nothing serious in there....
    May 27 at 2:40 a.m.
    #12
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2016
    Posts: 3,126
    Likes: 2,147
    ANA not even remotely interested
    OldNYIfan liked this.
    May 27 at 11:23 a.m.
    #13
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Nov. 2023
    Posts: 1,225
    Likes: 415
    Quoting: Billy316
    I stated what i meant in English i "MIGHT"
    I like McTavish too and i've been on the fence about this for a while as OldNYIFan can confirm
    Every Zegras trade i say there's 1 ANA player i might trade that top 5 for but that would have to be the day of the draft depending on who went top 3 before i'd make that call. But it comes down to who's available as McTavish is good but im not convinced he's better then Demidov or Lindstrom long term is where i struggle with this
    I mean if both are gone and its all D left or Catton or Eiserman or Iginla then sure ,i'd trade.
    But if Demidov or Lindstrom is there i dont know. As good as McTavish Truly is, and he is REALLY Good.
    Demidov and Lindstrom are too. Both fit MTL's needs and Hughes has expressed interests in both as well as Iginla.


    I get your side of it
    I wouldnt trade Suzuki for your 3rd OA
    Doesnt mean much outside i like Suzuki a lot
    Most people would at least consider a package built around it at the very least.
    I would not , and i suspect you're the same. No shame in it and its why Core Players arent moved often untill pushed out by youth

    I mean i get ANA POV as you've got Zegras to move for a good pick even if he wouldnt make me consider giving up a top 10 pick for him, i'd likely give up a top 15 as he has value. So why would ANA feel motivated to use McTavish even if your really really wanted two top 5 picks in this years draft, its counter productive like MTL moving Suzuki for a 3rd OA would be today. But if i were to even consider doing it McTavish is the only ANA pieces id be looking at is the context of my original statement essentially


    fantastic

    i wish more posts were like this

    that said. zegras is a flashy middle six -top 6 forward.

    thats not indispensable. top 15 pick is what hes worth imo as well.
    May 27 at 2:08 p.m.
    #14
    Optimistic
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Feb. 2024
    Posts: 20
    Likes: 3
    Isles say yes and RUN
     
    Reply
    To create a post please Login or Register
    Question:
    Options:
    Add Option
    Submit Poll