SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Mitch and Bedsy

Created by: thestrongdadclub
Team: 2024-25 Chicago Blackhawks
Initial Creation Date: May 31, 2024
Published: May 31, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$1,300,000
1$892,000
1$840,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$3,600,000
CREATEDYEARSCAP HIT
Levshunov, Artyom
3$950,000
Trades
1.
TOR
  1. Vlasic, Alex
  2. 2025 1st round pick (TOR)
  3. 2025 2nd round pick (DAL)
  4. 2026 2nd round pick (TOR)
2.
VGK
  1. Kaiser, Wyatt
  2. 2024 1st round pick (NYI)
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CHI
2025
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
2026
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$87,700,000$71,144,983$0$6,307,500$16,555,017

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$950,000$950,000 (Performance Bonus$3,500,000$4M)
C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$10,903,000$10,903,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,250,000$4,250,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$950,000$950,000 (Performance Bonus$900,000$900K)
RW, C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,250,000$2,250,000
LW, C, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,200,000$1,200,000
LW, C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,250,000$4,250,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 2
$3,600,000$3,600,000
LW, RW
UFA
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$892,000$892,000
LW, C
RFA
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$912,500$912,500 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LW
RFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Vegas Golden Knights
$2,294,150$2,294,150
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$9,500,000$9,500,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,250,000$4,250,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$918,333$918,333 (Performance Bonus$1,000,000$1M)
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,400,000$4,400,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$962,500$962,500
G
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$840,000$840,000
LD
RFA
$1,300,000$1,300,000
RD
RFA
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$855,833$855,833 (Performance Bonus$57,500$58K)
LD
RFA - 2

Special Teams

Power Play 2
 
 
 
 

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
May 31 at 9:23 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 246
Likes: 48
not value for marner
May 31 at 9:33 a.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2022
Posts: 9,676
Likes: 12,129
Hawks aren't trading Vlasic and won't be interested in any deal for a one year Marner rental. And since Vlasic is staying, no need for Hauge either.
PaulKorea, exo2769, Bedsy_Burner and 2 others liked this.
May 31 at 9:35 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2023
Posts: 1,528
Likes: 2,601
Hawks decline these easily.
exo2769, Bedsy_Burner, SociallyHawkward and 1 other person liked this.
May 31 at 9:38 a.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2024
Posts: 53
Likes: 28
Quoting: Napparific
not value for marner


Without a NMC and a limited number of teams he'll go to I would agree with you, But given the circumstances this is what I think you can expect for him unless you are getting a player of a similar age ie Seth Jones.

Vlasic is a 6'6" young defender with top pair potential.
May 31 at 9:38 a.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2024
Posts: 53
Likes: 28
Quoting: Hawksguy81
Hawks aren't trading Vlasic and won't be interested in any deal for a one year Marner rental. And since Vlasic is staying, no need for Hauge either.


Wouldn't be a rental obviously.
May 31 at 9:38 a.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2024
Posts: 53
Likes: 28
Quoting: Hawksguy81
Hawks aren't trading Vlasic and won't be interested in any deal for a one year Marner rental. And since Vlasic is staying, no need for Hauge either.


That's an alternative. Make it yourself.
May 31 at 9:38 a.m.
#7
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2024
Posts: 53
Likes: 28
Quoting: PaulKorea
Hawks decline these easily.


Why?
May 31 at 9:40 a.m.
#8
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2024
Posts: 53
Likes: 28
Quoting: Hawksguy81
Hawks aren't trading Vlasic and won't be interested in any deal for a one year Marner rental. And since Vlasic is staying, no need for Hauge either.


They may be interested in moving Vlasic if they plan on taking Artyom Levshunov with the 2nd pick.
May 31 at 9:44 a.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 8,376
Likes: 5,037
Hawks wouldn't move Vlasic for Marner 1 for 1
exo2769, JK74, Hawksguy81 and 3 others liked this.
May 31 at 9:45 a.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 8,376
Likes: 5,037
Quoting: thestrongdadclub
They may be interested in moving Vlasic if they plan on taking Artyom Levshunov with the 2nd pick.


One's a lefty and the other is a righty, and you play 3 of each of those guys not just one. Makes zero sense at all.
JK74, Hawksguy81, Bedsy_Burner and 2 others liked this.
May 31 at 9:50 a.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2023
Posts: 1,528
Likes: 2,601
Quoting: thestrongdadclub
Why?

How many times does it need to be said that Marner isn't a fit for the Hawks? Yet you're still questioning why.

They aren't trading Vlasic for reasons stated already in this thread and they're set at LD so they'd don't need Hague.
JK74, SociallyHawkward and cagauf liked this.
May 31 at 9:50 a.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2023
Posts: 1,528
Likes: 2,601
Quoting: thestrongdadclub
They may be interested in moving Vlasic if they plan on taking Artyom Levshunov with the 2nd pick.


They still wouldn't trade Vlasic.
JK74, SociallyHawkward and cagauf liked this.
May 31 at 9:51 a.m.
#13
exo2769
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 16,132
Likes: 10,622
Edited May 31 at 9:57 a.m.
Quoting: thestrongdadclub
Without a NMC and a limited number of teams he'll go to I would agree with you, But given the circumstances this is what I think you can expect for him unless you are getting a player of a similar age ie Seth Jones.

Vlasic is a 6'6" young defender with top pair potential.


It's not top pair potential...he did it ALL of last year and was the Hawks best defensive Dman for the entire year as essentially a rookie. 1 NHL game too many to be considered for Calder votes. If anyone watched last year the Leafs Hawks game...that was his coming out party when he just removed Matthews off the puck with regularity like he was taking candy from a baby AND Matthews is amazing!

Quoting: thestrongdadclub
They may be interested in moving Vlasic if they plan on taking Artyom Levshunov with the 2nd pick.


Nope. LD vs RD. Hawks wouldn't do Vlaisc for Marner 1 for 1. He's a cornerstone of the rebuild.
PaulKorea, JK74, Hawksguy81 and 2 others liked this.
May 31 at 9:53 a.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2022
Posts: 1,704
Likes: 3,618
Edited May 31 at 10:21 a.m.
Quoting: thestrongdadclub
Wouldn't be a rental obviously.


Doesn’t matter, defense wins championships. Marner doesn't.
May 31 at 10:01 a.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2022
Posts: 9,676
Likes: 12,129
Quoting: thestrongdadclub
They may be interested in moving Vlasic if they plan on taking Artyom Levshunov with the 2nd pick.


Why would you think that? Vlasic Is a LD. Levshunov is a RD. If the Hawks draft Levshunov, it's probably with the idea that those two play TOGETHER on the Hawks top pair for the next decade.
exo2769, JK74, PaulKorea and 2 others liked this.
May 31 at 10:02 a.m.
#16
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2024
Posts: 53
Likes: 28
Quoting: exo2769
It's not top pair potential...he did it ALL of last year and was the Hawks best defensive Dman for the entire year as essentially a rookie. 1 NHL game too many to be considered for Calder votes. If anyone watched last year the Leafs Hawks game...that was his coming out party when he just removed Matthews off the puck with regularity like he was taking candy from a baby AND Matthews is amazing!



Nope. LD vs RD. Hawks wouldn't do Vlaisc for Marner 1 for 1. He's a cornerstone of the rebuild.


Marner would also be a cornerstone of the rebuild. He’s 27 and would be signed for prime years.
May 31 at 10:03 a.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2022
Posts: 1,704
Likes: 3,618
Quoting: thestrongdadclub
That's an alternative. Make it yourself.


When you post something publicly you open yourself up for criticism. There's much here to criticize. Be prepared to defend your opinions. Nobody's making it personal so don't get salty. If you belive in what you posted here, great. But just like this is your opinion, others have a right to share theirs. Cheers buddy!
cagauf liked this.
May 31 at 10:04 a.m.
#18
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2024
Posts: 53
Likes: 28
Quoting: PaulKorea
How many times does it need to be said that Marner isn't a fit for the Hawks? Yet you're still questioning why.

They aren't trading Vlasic for reasons stated already in this thread and they're set at LD so they'd don't need Hague.


There are equally as good reasons to acquire him if you’re the Hawks. If you can’t see that you have blinders on and strong biases that you aren’t aware of lol
May 31 at 10:05 a.m.
#19
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2024
Posts: 53
Likes: 28
Quoting: JK74
When you post something publicly you open yourself up for criticism. There's much here to criticize. Be prepared to defend your opinions. Nobody's making it personal so don't get salty. If you belive in what you posted here, great. But just like this is your opinion, others have a right to share theirs. Cheers buddy!


Not salty! Just sharing my opinion! Stay salty!
JK74 liked this.
May 31 at 10:06 a.m.
#20
exo2769
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 16,132
Likes: 10,622
Quoting: thestrongdadclub
Marner would also be a cornerstone of the rebuild. He’s 27 and would be signed for prime years.


Marner is really good. I like him. Truly, I do. We can fill holes on our team without creating even larger holes...which this trade does even Vlasic 1 for 1 with Marner...which the Hawks would NEVER do. We can get a Marner as a UFA. Those are out there. We can't get a Vlasic as a UFA. Top Pair Dmen as 22 years old (soon to be 23) are worth more than gold itself. The delta between Marner and Jake Guentzel isn't THAT far off. Yes Marner is better, but not enough to lose serious assets.

Hawks need to stay the course!
May 31 at 10:08 a.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2022
Posts: 1,704
Likes: 3,618
Quoting: thestrongdadclub
Not salty! Just sharing my opinion! Stay salty!


I'm always salty. That's my secret for surviving the chaos we live in!
PaulKorea liked this.
May 31 at 10:08 a.m.
#22
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2024
Posts: 53
Likes: 28
Quoting: Hawksguy81
Why would you think that? Vlasic Is a LD. Levshunov is a RD. If the Hawks draft Levshunov, it's probably with the idea that those two play TOGETHER on the Hawks top pair for the next decade.


That might be an consideration. Might not be.

They also still have Jones and Korchinski so you have a solid top 3 for the next 5 years at least.
May 31 at 10:10 a.m.
#23
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2022
Posts: 9,676
Likes: 12,129
Quoting: thestrongdadclub
Wouldn't be a rental obviously.


Well maybe state that Marner agrees to an extension somewhere in your post. Even w/ an extension, the Hawks still aren't including Vlasic. How about replacing Vlasic w/ Kaiser and call it a day.
May 31 at 10:12 a.m.
#24
exo2769
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 16,132
Likes: 10,622
Quoting: Hawksguy81
Well maybe state that Marner agrees to an extension somewhere in your post. Even w/ an extension, the Hawks still aren't including Vlasic. How about replacing Vlasic w/ Kaiser and call it a day.


Still somewhat depends on the contract. Marner isn't worth $12M imo. Just because Nylander isn't worth $11.5M doesn't mean we should be overpaying Marner either.
PaulKorea, Hawksguy81, SociallyHawkward and 1 other person liked this.
May 31 at 10:15 a.m.
#25
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2024
Posts: 53
Likes: 28
Quoting: exo2769
Marner is really good. I like him. Truly, I do. We can fill holes on our team without creating even larger holes...which this trade does even Vlasic 1 for 1 with Marner...which the Hawks would NEVER do. We can get a Marner as a UFA. Those are out there. We can't get a Vlasic as a UFA. Top Pair Dmen as 22 years old (soon to be 23) are worth more than gold itself. The delta between Marner and Jake Guentzel isn't THAT far off. Yes Marner is better, but not enough to lose serious assets.

Hawks need to stay the course!


Fair points. Thanks for sharing some constructive criticism!
exo2769 and JK74 liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll