SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Trade Route

Created by: DFinn91
Team: 2024-25 San Jose Sharks
Initial Creation Date: May 31, 2024
Published: May 31, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$1,000,000
1$1,000,000
1$1,000,000
3$2,500,000
2$1,500,000
CREATEDYEARSCAP HIT
Celebrini, Macklin
3$950,000
Trades
1.
SJS
  1. Broberg, Philip [RFA Rights]
  2. Campbell, Jack
  3. 2025 1st round pick (EDM)
2.
SJS
  1. Pageau, Jean-Gabriel
  2. 2025 3rd round pick (NYI)
3.
SJS
  1. Jeannot, Tanner
  2. Sheary, Conor
  3. 2025 3rd round pick (TBL)
TBL
  1. Benning, Matthew
  2. 2025 6th round pick (SJS)
4.
SJS
  1. Mikheyev, Ilya
  2. 2025 2nd round pick (VAN)
VAN
  1. 2025 7th round pick (NJD)
5.
SJS
  1. Schmidt, Nate
  2. 2026 3rd round pick (WPG)
WPG
  1. 2026 7th round pick (SJS)
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the SJS
2025
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the WPG
2026
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$87,700,000$78,180,833$0$4,107,500$9,519,167
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LW
RFA - 2
Celebrini, Macklin
$950,000$950,000
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,450,000$1,450,000
RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$2,665,000$2,665,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$950,000$950,000 (Performance Bonus$3,200,000$3M)
C
RFA - 3
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$828,333$828,333 (Performance Bonus$57,500$58K)
LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the New York Islanders
$5,000,000$5,000,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$4,750,000$4,750,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
C, LW
RFA
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,000,000$2,000,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RW, C
RFA
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$3,250,000$3,250,000
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$5,950,000$5,950,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,350,000$2,350,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LD
RFA
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RD
RFA
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$3,400,000$3,400,000
G
UFA - 1
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LD
RFA
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$8,000,000$8,000,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$800,000$800,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
May 31 at 11:01 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2022
Posts: 759
Likes: 177
Pageau and Mikheyev aren’t cap dumps
May 31 at 11:04 a.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 713
Likes: 474
Schmidt's available for future considerations if SJS isn't on his M-NTC. Otherwise, you can try to sign him as a UFA if WPG buys him out.
May 31 at 11:10 a.m.
#3
Stovetop
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 2,328
Likes: 1,059
Quoting: capsleafs447
Pageau and Mikheyev aren’t cap dumps


Yes, they very much are
May 31 at 11:15 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2021
Posts: 1,629
Likes: 919
this is realistically the right way, get some okay depth pieces who could bounce back, and some draft assets while we are at it.

Doesn't make sense to go out and overpay UFAs who will most likely regress before we start competing
DFinn91 liked this.
May 31 at 11:18 a.m.
#5
Tblecavalier4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2016
Posts: 47
Likes: 8
Taking Sheary of TBL hands does have a cost (I assume why the 3rd round pick). But TBL can also get some cap relief if they buy him out. His cap would be around $580k and he would be replaced with a player making $800k, giving a net cap savings of $620k to just buy him out.

This would be a no from Tampa meaning the trade really looks like Jeannot for Benning+6th. Jeannot still have some trade value and Benning wouldn't be needed (unless TBL traded Cernak away). Even if that the return wouldn't be good enough for Jeannot
May 31 at 11:19 a.m.
#6
Stovetop
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 2,328
Likes: 1,059
Quoting: Letsgosharks
this is realistically the right way, get some okay depth pieces who could bounce back, and some draft assets while we are at it.

Doesn't make sense to go out and overpay UFAs who will most likely regress before we start competing


I disagree. Cap dumps are cap dumps for a reason. They're not playing well. that's not the type of player Grier should be bringing over.

You can overpay some really solid UFAs on 1-3 year deals and actually help the team play competitive hockey, then deal them for better assets than the one's you'd get for taking on a cap dump.
Letsgosharks and RecycleShark liked this.
May 31 at 11:22 a.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2021
Posts: 1,629
Likes: 919
Quoting: AStovetop
I disagree. Cap dumps are cap dumps for a reason. They're not playing well. that's not the type of player Grier should be bringing over.

You can overpay some really solid UFAs on 1-3 year deals and actually help the team play competitive hockey, then deal them for better assets than the one's you'd get for taking on a cap dump.


Agree to disagree, it depends on the cap dump you get. These are more like cap casualties. If these players were making 2-3m they would be completely different stories. They are still good enough to be 3rd liners, they are just significantly overpaid, but because of our cap situation we can afford it.

IF we can get really solid UFAs on 1-3 year deals I am all for it. I just don't know how realistic that actually is
May 31 at 11:38 a.m.
#8
Stovetop
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 2,328
Likes: 1,059
Quoting: Letsgosharks
Agree to disagree, it depends on the cap dump you get. These are more like cap casualties. If these players were making 2-3m they would be completely different stories. They are still good enough to be 3rd liners, they are just significantly overpaid, but because of our cap situation we can afford it.

IF we can get really solid UFAs on 1-3 year deals I am all for it. I just don't know how realistic that actually is


I agree with that. Granlund was technically a cap dump. there's some guys I'd definitely be interested in from teams that can't fit them, but Pageau, Mikheyev, and Schmidt aren't those guys.

I think for UFAs, Chatfield, DeMelo, Pesce, Roy, etc would be good targets for D-men (some more likely than others). Domi, Stephenson, Duchene, for forward tragets. We'll see what happens with Celebrini, but having him and Smith signed would really show free agents that it could be a good place to play and then get dealt to contender
DFinn91, Letsgosharks, RecycleShark and 1 other person liked this.
May 31 at 11:46 a.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2021
Posts: 1,629
Likes: 919
Quoting: AStovetop
I agree with that. Granlund was technically a cap dump. there's some guys I'd definitely be interested in from teams that can't fit them, but Pageau, Mikheyev, and Schmidt aren't those guys.

I think for UFAs, Chatfield, DeMelo, Pesce, Roy, etc would be good targets for D-men (some more likely than others). Domi, Stephenson, Duchene, for forward tragets. We'll see what happens with Celebrini, but having him and Smith signed would really show free agents that it could be a good place to play and then get dealt to contender


Yeah exactly, I think Pageau is a decent temporary 3c. Mikheyev sucks but I would probably go after Reilly Smith as someone the Pens can't really fit on their team anymore.

My only thing is I just don't want to overpay UFAs long term, and create a log jam in our forward core, similar to what our Defense is starting to experience a little bit.

Good point though, UFAs should be able to put up some points around Celebrini and Smith, I just don't want to create cap dumps of our own if we sign them to 3+ year deals
RecycleShark and Sjbackseatgm liked this.
May 31 at 12:30 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 755
Likes: 264
Quoting: AStovetop
I disagree. Cap dumps are cap dumps for a reason. They're not playing well. that's not the type of player Grier should be bringing over.

You can overpay some really solid UFAs on 1-3 year deals and actually help the team play competitive hockey, then deal them for better assets than the one's you'd get for taking on a cap dump.


If a player is overpaid (even if they are still a good NHLer) or if a team needs to add an asset to move them they are a dump but that is being nitpicky.
May 31 at 12:35 p.m.
#11
RecycleShark
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2023
Posts: 1,407
Likes: 421
The Sharks already have too many L4 and P3 players, so whoever we bring in (whether via capdump, UFA, waiver, or non capdump trade) should be better than that. Otherwise they are just blocking opportunities for Sharks prospects. An exception might be if we could trade one low skill player for another one and get a decent pick or prospect in addition. Or add a 4th line player like an Okposo or Clutterbuck who brings a lot of leadership, toughness, and intangibles.

The Sharks also have too many players under 6', 190 lbs. I wouldn't want to add too many more like Sheary and Pageau. I don't know much about Sheary, but his capfriendly stats say L4, 5'8, 179 lbs, 15 points, so I'd skip him.
May 31 at 1:30 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2022
Posts: 759
Likes: 177
Quoting: AStovetop
Yes, they very much are


Strongly disagree, particularly about Pageau.

Look at Mantha. People on Capfriendly were saying he was a cap dump after one meh season and then he bounced back and netted a second and a third. This happens frequently. Dumping them when their value is the lowest is just bad business. And Pageau is great defensively and worth his cap hit.

It's the same thing with David Kampf where people just look at their points totals and ignore their on-ice play and defensive capabilities. Neither are cap dumps just because of their point totals. Defense matters.
May 31 at 1:39 p.m.
#13
Stovetop
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 2,328
Likes: 1,059
Quoting: capsleafs447
Strongly disagree, particularly about Pageau.

Look at Mantha. People on Capfriendly were saying he was a cap dump after one meh season and then he bounced back and netted a second and a third. This happens frequently. Dumping them when their value is the lowest is just bad business. And Pageau is great defensively and worth his cap hit.

It's the same thing with David Kampf where people just look at their points totals and ignore their on-ice play and defensive capabilities. Neither are cap dumps just because of their point totals. Defense matters.


"one meh season" Pageau has been bad since joining the islanders, so that comparison doesn't make sense. If the Islanders can afford to keep him and build a team that competes then great, keep him.
If not, then he's a cap dump. His cap hit is much higher than the value he brings. If you need to move a player like that, then it's a cap dump.
May 31 at 1:48 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2022
Posts: 759
Likes: 177
Quoting: AStovetop
"one meh season" Pageau has been bad since joining the islanders, so that comparison doesn't make sense. If the Islanders can afford to keep him and build a team that competes then great, keep him.
If not, then he's a cap dump. His cap hit is much higher than the value he brings. If you need to move a player like that, then it's a cap dump.


No... he hasn't been that bad...
May 31 at 2:48 p.m.
#15
RecycleShark
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2023
Posts: 1,407
Likes: 421
Quoting: AStovetop
"one meh season" Pageau has been bad since joining the islanders, so that comparison doesn't make sense. If the Islanders can afford to keep him and build a team that competes then great, keep him.
If not, then he's a cap dump. His cap hit is much higher than the value he brings. If you need to move a player like that, then it's a cap dump.


If Pageau is that bad then do the Sharks really want him?
May 31 at 3:09 p.m.
#16
Stovetop
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 2,328
Likes: 1,059
Quoting: RecycleShark
If Pageau is that bad then do the Sharks really want him?


I absolutely do not want him unless there's very good assets going with him
May 31 at 3:19 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 24,327
Likes: 7,846
Edmonton agrees if you take out Broberg and Kostin.
May 31 at 4:15 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 5,353
Likes: 2,945
Sharks should get a 2nd back for Pageau at least, his dump is 250k worse than Vancouver with Mikheyev.

And we’re overpaying Tampa for a cap dump and 4th liner. I’d take out the 3rd. Otherwise I like the trade ideas themselves.
May 31 at 11:11 p.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 4,767
Likes: 1,166
Quoting: CD282
Edmonton agrees if you take out Broberg and Kostin.


Yeah Broberg scored a goal tonight so edm fan wants 2 1st for him now
May 31 at 11:11 p.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 4,767
Likes: 1,166
Quoting: AStovetop
Yes, they very much are


If Mikheyev is not a cap dump then no one is
Jun. 1 at 1:29 p.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 24,327
Likes: 7,846
Quoting: vols94
Yeah Broberg scored a goal tonight so edm fan wants 2 1st for him now


No, we just want to keep him. Same as yesterday.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll