SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Trade with Edmonton

Created by: jonnnycanuck44
Team: 2017-18 Vancouver Canucks
Initial Creation Date: Aug. 2, 2017
Published: Aug. 2, 2017
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
6$6,750,000
Trades
1.
2.
3.
VAN
  1. 2018 1st round pick (NSH)
Additional Details:
After a successful season with the twins Canucks flip Hornqvist. Trade Deadline 2018
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2018
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
2019
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
2020
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
25$75,000,000$68,945,724$0$1,700,000$6,054,276
Left WingCentreRight Wing
$1,850,000$1,850,000
LW
UFA - 1
$6,750,000$6,750,000
C
UFA - 6
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW
UFA - 2
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LW
NMC
UFA - 1
$7,000,000$7,000,000
C
NMC
UFA - 1
$900,000$900,000
RW, LW, C
UFA - 1
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LW, C
UFA - 4
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW, LW
UFA - 1
$839,166$839,166
LW, RW
UFA - 4
$2,835,000$2,835,000
RW, C
UFA - 3
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 5
$687,500$687,500
LW
UFA - 1
$900,000$900,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
$2,650,000$2,650,000
RW
UFA - 2
$687,500$687,500
C
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD
NTC
UFA - 2
$894,166$894,166
LD
UFA - 4
$3,666,667$3,666,667
G
UFA - 3
$3,333,225$3,333,225
LD
UFA - 5
$925,000$925,000
RD
UFA - 1
$2,500,000$2,500,000
G
UFA - 2
$2,250,000$2,250,000
LD
UFA - 2
$925,000$925,000
D
UFA - 1
$650,000$650,000
LD
UFA - 1
$750,000$750,000
RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Aug. 2, 2017 at 8:38 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2016
Posts: 3,996
Likes: 930
Take out the 2nd and Hutton put in Boeser and add the second on Edmonton side. RNH plus Benson and second for Tanev and Boeser
Aug. 2, 2017 at 8:46 p.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Jonny Canuck
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 391
Likes: 16
Quoting: Dylan1995
Take out the 2nd and Hutton put in Boeser and add the second on Edmonton side. RNH plus Benson and second for Tanev and Boeser


That's what I was actually going to do and it's fair value... Just so hard giving up Boeser
Aug. 2, 2017 at 8:48 p.m.
#3
Stars
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 775
Likes: 62
PIT trade is not so good. Määttä is still improving young defenseman, more valuable than Sutter and Gudbranson combined. You gotta add a 2nd rd pick there and retain some of Sutter's salary to make that happen.
Aug. 2, 2017 at 8:50 p.m.
#4
mz1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 132
Likes: 6
Sutter wasn't a good fit the first time around but might work out with the new system. A first round pick instead of the third might get it done.
jonnnycanuck44 liked this.
Aug. 2, 2017 at 8:52 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1,788
Likes: 208
Benson is an Edmonton boy
Aug. 2, 2017 at 9:00 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2016
Posts: 3,996
Likes: 930
Quoting: oilnate
Benson is an Edmonton boy


I think he means cause he plays for the Vancouver Giants it would be cool if he played for the Canucks as well
jonnnycanuck44 liked this.
Aug. 2, 2017 at 9:09 p.m.
#7
Thread Starter
Jonny Canuck
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 391
Likes: 16
Quoting: Dylan1995
Quoting: oilnate
Benson is an Edmonton boy


I think he means cause he plays for the Vancouver Giants it would be cool if he played for the Canucks as well


Exactly what I meant thanks
Aug. 2, 2017 at 9:10 p.m.
#8
Thread Starter
Jonny Canuck
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 391
Likes: 16
Quoting: Starsfan98
PIT trade is not so good. Määttä is still improving young defenseman, more valuable than Sutter and Gudbranson combined. You gotta add a 2nd rd pick there and retain some of Sutter's salary to make that happen.


Yeah that sounds fair man but Gubranson was a top 3 pick so I'd say equally as worth the both of them not both.
Aug. 2, 2017 at 9:13 p.m.
#9
Thread Starter
Jonny Canuck
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 391
Likes: 16
Quoting: mz1
Sutter wasn't a good fit the first time around but might work out with the new system. A first round pick instead of the third might get it done.


First round is a lot I think what starsfan98 said about a second round pick and Retain Sutter
Aug. 3, 2017 at 6:01 a.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2016
Posts: 2,933
Likes: 362
canucks should just forget about this year. next season with so many teams near the cap;, guys like RHN at 6m will come very cheaply. Sutter at 4.4m for four more years, teams will pass.
Aug. 3, 2017 at 10:09 a.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1,788
Likes: 208
Quoting: jonnnycanuck44
Quoting: Dylan1995


I think he means cause he plays for the Vancouver Giants it would be cool if he played for the Canucks as well


Exactly what I meant thanks

oh ok gotcha
Aug. 3, 2017 at 11:57 a.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 831
Likes: 88
Quoting: Dylan1995
Take out the 2nd and Hutton put in Boeser and add the second on Edmonton side. RNH plus Benson and second for Tanev and Boeser


HAHAHAHAHAHA no. TF would make you want Benson over Boeser? Tanev + pick is for RNH so Boeser for Benson? Give your head a shake
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll