SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Markstrom Out Necas and Skjei in

Created by: TMLBRIAN
Team: 2024-25 Calgary Flames
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 12, 2024
Published: Jun. 12, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
CGY gets the 10th overall. NJD gets the 28th overall + Markstrom at 50% retention.

Thoughts?
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$775,000
2$950,000
8$7,000,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$2,500,000
7$7,000,000
Trades
1.
CGY
  1. 2024 1st round pick (NJD)
NJD
  1. Markström, Jacob ($3,000,000 retained)
  2. 2024 1st round pick (VAN)
2.
CGY
  1. Necas, Martin [RFA Rights]
CAR
  1. 2024 1st round pick (NJD)
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the CGY
2025
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
2026
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
25$88,000,000$84,840,000$0$1,145,000$3,160,000
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,500,000$5,500,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
$7,000,000$7,000,000
RW
RFA
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$10,500,000$10,500,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,800,000$5,800,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$3,100,000$3,100,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$7,000,000$7,000,000
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,900,000$4,900,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,300,000$1,300,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,500,000$4,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$775,000$775,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$775,000$775,000
RW, C
RFA
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$825,000$825,000
RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LD
UFA
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,250,000$6,250,000
LD/RD
NTC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$950,000$950,000
G
RFA
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,500,000$2,500,000
LD/RD
UFA
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,550,000$4,550,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,200,000$2,200,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$814,167$814,167 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,250,000$1,250,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$787,500$787,500
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$775,000$775,000
RD
RFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Wed. at 11:40 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2023
Posts: 67
Likes: 27
I'd rather keep the 10th if we managed to get it from NJ
iggy12rocks and OldNYIfan liked this.
Wed. at 11:59 a.m.
#2
Wayne glenskyisaGOAT
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2024
Posts: 442
Likes: 102
Yes to jersey no to carolina. Flames should keep picks not trade them we are in a rebuild/retool. we don't need necas
Wigs711 and OldNYIfan liked this.
Wed. at 12:10 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 42,675
Likes: 19,336
Two things may be simultaneously true.

1. Fitzgerald is talking to Conroy about acquiring Markstrom again.
2. Fitzgerald is talking to teams about moving the #10 pick for a player.

THIS DOES NOT mean he is moving #10 for Markstrom.

These are two separate things.

In fact, he has been clear on the record saying that pick could be traded for F, D or G...and would have to be someone in 'right demographic' (in their 20s) and will term/control.
OldNYIfan and NJTM liked this.
Wed. at 12:43 p.m.
#4
Lets Get Kraken
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 9,030
Likes: 3,559
I doubt the Canes would take only 10OA for Necas. It simply doesn’t help them in win now mode.
Wed. at 2:19 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2024
Posts: 107
Likes: 15
You gonna have to ADD alot more than 1st and markstorm.
Wed. at 3:39 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 39,617
Likes: 20,406
Quoting: NHLfan10506
Two things may be simultaneously true.

1. Fitzgerald is talking to Conroy about acquiring Markstrom again.
2. Fitzgerald is talking to teams about moving the #10 pick for a player.

THIS DOES NOT mean he is moving #10 for Markstrom.

These are two separate things.

In fact, he has been clear on the record saying that pick could be traded for F, D or G...and would have to be someone in 'right demographic' (in their 20s) and will term/control.


Right demographic can refer to window of competition. Markstrom with 2 years of term absolutely fits that.

I find the whole situation weird because Devils fans seems to issue with trading a 1st for Markstrom if they can trade back to like 15th first. Just to gain an extra 2nd round pick. IMO it's just a roundabout way of thinking to avoid physically trading the 10th OA directly for Markstrom
Wed. at 4:27 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 42,675
Likes: 19,336
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Right demographic can refer to window of competition. Markstrom with 2 years of term absolutely fits that.

I find the whole situation weird because Devils fans seems to issue with trading a 1st for Markstrom if they can trade back to like 15th first. Just to gain an extra 2nd round pick. IMO it's just a roundabout way of thinking to avoid physically trading the 10th OA directly for Markstrom


He was definitely talking about age with the “right demographic” quote. He even qualified it by saying, “maybe not age 22, 23, but same age as our core”. It was almost as he was saying bluntly, it’s not a pick we are trading for 34-year old goalie. He also said he would move it for a player that is controllable not only for this year, next year, but “years to come”.

And he was clear in a couple of interviews that it may be a forward or dman in return if he dealt that pick. Almost sounded like he want to downplay goalie targets.

Before his recent round of interviews, I thought NJD 1st for Markstrom, VAN 1st could be possible…it’s hard to think that now.
Wed. at 5:41 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 42,675
Likes: 19,336
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Right demographic can refer to window of competition. Markstrom with 2 years of term absolutely fits that.

I find the whole situation weird because Devils fans seems to issue with trading a 1st for Markstrom if they can trade back to like 15th first. Just to gain an extra 2nd round pick. IMO it's just a roundabout way of thinking to avoid physically trading the 10th OA directly for Markstrom


Do your Calgary Puck friends have any insider scoop?
Wed. at 5:44 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 39,617
Likes: 20,406
Quoting: NHLfan10506
Do your Calgary Puck friends have any insider scoop?


I don't use that cesspool of a website, don't have an account and no plans to make one. Quit being an ass
Wed. at 5:46 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 42,675
Likes: 19,336
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
I don't use that cesspool of a website, don't have an account and no plans to make one. Quit being an ass


Welcome to CapFriendly.

(Just asking…you pointed me there in February)
Wed. at 5:50 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 39,617
Likes: 20,406
Quoting: NHLfan10506
Welcome to CapFriendly.

(Just asking…you pointed me there in February)


I pointed to HF boards, which is where it was stated originally.

I have no doubt that there are a few users on Calgary Puck with legitimate inside connections. But there are also a lot of users that pretend to have inside info that post constantly on there
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll