SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Toronto Maple Leafs

Trade McEllhiney!

Is this trade realistic?
The chart has been hidden

Poll Options


Nov. 3, 2017 at 7:21 a.m.
#1
get ur corsi up
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 5,953
Likes: 1,558
Arizona Coyotes or Vegas Golden Knights
Curtis McEllhiney

Toronto Maple Leafs
2018 6th

We need Pickard to be our backup, McEllhiney needs to go.
Nov. 3, 2017 at 11:46 a.m.
#2
Follow capfriendly
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 1336
Posts: 2,663
Likes: 1,915
With his production this year I think he would be a 7th or future consids.
Nov. 3, 2017 at 5:54 p.m.
#3
Thread Starter
get ur corsi up
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 5,953
Likes: 1,558
Quoting: Banks
With his production this year I think he would be a 7th or future consids.


True, maybe a conditional 7th would work.
If McEllhinney plays at least 18 games it becomes a 6th, if less it stays a 7th.
Nov. 4, 2017 at 4:05 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2015
Posts: 1,565
Likes: 89
Can't see any team taking him but that's really not a problem. Call Sparks up and have McElhiney backup Pickard
Billius liked this.
Nov. 4, 2017 at 5:48 p.m.
#5
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 59,415
Likes: 22,630
Gee, I didn't know McElhiney was the reason have been playing so poorly for two weeks. No reason to think Pickard or Sparks will be any better. Because McIlerny has to be waived but has no cap implications if sent to the Marlies, I suggest don't trade him if you really want to go with another back up.
Nov. 4, 2017 at 6:03 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
get ur corsi up
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 5,953
Likes: 1,558
Quoting: palhal
Gee, I didn't know McElhiney was the reason have been playing so poorly for two weeks. No reason to think Pickard or Sparks will be any better. Because McIlerny has to be waived but has no cap implications if sent to the Marlies, I suggest don't trade him if you really want to go with another back up.


Pickard players admirably for a team with horrid defense last season, he’s got put on waivers once and now everyone thinks he’s worthless. Pickard has more potential that McEllhiney, and should be played over him.
Nov. 4, 2017 at 6:47 p.m.
#7
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 59,415
Likes: 22,630
Daryl: I'll agree that Pickard has more potential. But that isn't the reason to promote him. Is he a better backup than McEiliney is the only question.
Nov. 4, 2017 at 9:59 p.m.
#8
Thread Starter
get ur corsi up
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 5,953
Likes: 1,558
Quoting: palhal
Daryl: I'll agree that Pickard has more potential. But that isn't the reason to promote him. Is he a better backup than McEiliney is the only question.


If he can be decent in Colorado, he can play better than McEllhiney.
Dec. 7, 2017 at 4:18 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 698
Likes: 679
I don't understand why you'd call up Picks instead of Sparks, who's been the best goalie in the A by far.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Loading animation
Submit Poll Edit