SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

AJC13

AJC13
Member Since
Oct. 4, 2018
Favourite Team
New York Rangers
Forum Posts
1313
Posts per Day
0.6
Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 15, 2021 at 9:51 a.m.
Thread: 2022-2023 As it stands now
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Lenny7</b></div><div>I don't know...I don't think Edmonton gives up a 1st for those two guys. Overall value is probably reasonable, and going after a below league average goaltender is certainly a very "Edmonton" thing to do, but if they're intent on securing that goaltending position, there's better ways to go than this. Maybe a couple of 2nds instead?</div></div>

I don’t disagree... Maybe Drury instead trades Kravtsov to another team for a prospect or maybe even Kravtsov and Drury work things out and he returns to the Rangers after his KHL season concludes.

I just see Kravtsov putting up lots of points in the immediate future for Edmonton and I could see Georgiev being a good to very above average goaltender with a team that plays him the majority of the games or if he splits the games playing time.
Forum: Armchair-GMSep. 30, 2021 at 6:10 a.m.
Thread: Boeser to New York
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>F50marco</b></div><div>Vancouver is not going to trade Boeser just to resign Pettersson and Hughes. That doesn't make any sense. IMO

They need just enough cap space to be compliant. Whatever wherever that is/comes from. They can do that by making smaller trades, putting Ferland on LTIR and potentially the Hamonic situation will help them too.

And you don't sell a premium asset at a loss just to make space. Well you can, but its bad management.

The solution to Vancouver's cap situation is not Boeser. There is a easier and less destructive way to get there. Its hard for us to pinpoint how much without knowing how far apart the three camps are. I don't think they are that far off. it'll get done soon enough and it won't cost Boeser being traded to do it.</div></div>

I agree that IF Vancouver doesn’t have to trade Boeser, they shouldn’t. I believe the market value right now would be along the lines of what NYR received for Buchnevich.

Maybe the trade market changers this trade deadline or next offseason. Because I don’t think Vancouver will have the cap space to resign Boeser who becomes a RFA after the season. Even if other players on the roster are traded or bought out.
Forum: Armchair-GMSep. 29, 2021 at 12:37 p.m.
Thread: Boeser to New York
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>CMcAvoy73</b></div><div>Just for the record, you’re the one being a contrarian here. I don’t think you’ll find anyone outside of New York that thinks Boeser is worth Blais and a 2nd.</div></div>

Most in New York feel the Rangers should have received more in trade as well, but that is the market value. The Rangers have plenty of skilled players to replace Buchnevich. The Rangers were looking for a player like Blais to beat up on players like McAvoy in the playoffs.

Most fans who’ve never played the game only look at offensive production as a measuring stick, so someone like Blais who has a physical element to his game and point production potential are not appreciated.

Regardless, substitute someone else who’s more of a goal scorer than Blais, but much less physical and a 2nd round pick or just hold on to Boeser. Oh that’s right, they can’t afford to hold on to Boeser next season because they won’t be cap compliant after signing Pettersson and Hughes. Assuming no team gives them an offer sheet.

Vancouver is desperate to trade Boeser, much more so than NYR was to trade Buchnevich. To think Vancouver fans are going to be happy with the trade return of Boeser is flat out ignorant.
Forum: Armchair-GMSep. 29, 2021 at 12:09 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMSep. 29, 2021 at 9:50 a.m.
Thread: Boeser to New York
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>CMcAvoy73</b></div><div>Okay, so, this was over your head. I’ll explain why. Obviously…obviously this trade heavily favors the rangers. This particular poster went on a bit of a spree where he posted three of four threads with with the rangers getting phenomenal bounties for next to nothing. He had a thread just prior to this trading basically a first rounder for mcavoy.</div></div>

Looked up the McAvoy trade proposal... I hate trades that involve Strome... Strome has been just about a point per game player the last two seasons playing on a line with Panarin. The season prior to the last two, he was on pace (with NYR) for just about a 45 point season playing on the 3rd line - without Panarin.

But for some reason Strome is considered by most hockey fans, not rooting for the Rangers, to be over rated. Which leads to every trade proposal he’s listed in becoming a debate. Which is hysterical because obviously if he played for any Canadian team, the trade proposals being presented would be Strome for McAvoy straight up.
Forum: Armchair-GMSep. 29, 2021 at 9:34 a.m.
Thread: Boeser to New York
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>CMcAvoy73</b></div><div>Okay, so, this was over your head. I’ll explain why. Obviously…obviously this trade heavily favors the rangers. This particular poster went on a bit of a spree where he posted three of four threads with with the rangers getting phenomenal bounties for next to nothing. He had a thread just prior to this trading basically a first rounder for mcavoy.</div></div>


Thank you for explaining. Regardless of his other trade proposals, this trade is very tilted towards VAN - not NYR. Boeser’s market value right now is a player similar to Blais and a 2nd round pick. Unless you’re insinuating that the Vancouver’s GM is so much better that the Rangers GM, that he would be able to finagle more in trade out of the market value than Drury.
Forum: Armchair-GMSep. 29, 2021 at 9:23 a.m.