SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

Aasen6

Member Since
Jul. 26, 2021
Favourite Team
Vancouver Canucks
Forum Posts
1361
Posts per Day
1.4
Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 26 at 8:06 p.m.
Thread: A Team that could actually do it
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GiggywithGibby</b></div><div>3OA + McTavish + Mintyukov boy you must be smoking something good to think that's a real possibility.

The only reason Vancouver sells pettersson is because they can't afford his next contract, and if that's the case, you're going to get shafted on value. You wouldn't even get the proposed deal.</div></div>

Clearly you don’t watch hockey at all… Pettersson is a top 5C in the league who produces at a 100 point level offensively and has borderline selke level two way ability. Take the Tkachuk trade as a comparible then increase the value because Petey plays C. So to suggest Van wouldn’t even get Zegras and Lacombe with a 1st is absolutely ridiculous. I wouldn’t even be surprised if Van wanted more than Mctavish+ Mintyukov+ this years 1st
Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 26 at 1:59 p.m.
Thread: Who says no
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>dgibb10</b></div><div>Jack Hughes has been better defensively than Pettersson this year. (Pettersson’s defensive play this year and in general is incredibly overrated, and Jacks is incredibly underrated).

But Pettersson got a narrative around him (people associate killing penalties and winning faceoffs with being good defensively bc defensive play is very difficult to isolate)

And because Jack is small and doesn’t win faceoffs and doesn’t throw #hits, people assume he isn’t good defensively.</div></div>

What? Pettersson has a borderline selke level two way game while producing 100 points, Hughes is average defensively and puts up the same offensive numbers. At worst they’d be a wash in trade value because of Hughes’ contract but there’s a good argument that it would take Hughes + to acquire Petey.