Avatar

AirmanSD

Member Since
Aug. 11, 2020
Favourite Team
Detroit Red Wings
Forum Posts
92
Posts per Day
0.1
Forum: Armchair-GMOct. 14, 2022 at 6:51 p.m.
Thread: Detroit Double Dip
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Shakabakes</b></div><div>What would be an example?

What Player/Prospect from the Rangers (or any other team) would be reasonable for you to be paired with a 1st Rounder for Bertuzzi?</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Spaceman</b></div><div>I highly doubt Detroit would decline this. Obtaining a 1st, a 2nd and a B+ prospect like Kravstov for Bertuzzi and Suter would be a very good return.</div></div>

Have you seen the price to move cap this year thus far, I dont believe it will get cheaper. Bert is worth at the deadline a 1st + (what the plus is up for debate as his production this year will influence it) asking for retention on it adds more(it cost a Van a second to move the same amount of cap for instance). Suter's value is about a mid round pick at this point, maybe even less given his contract. So the deal isn't the low ball offer some might say, but it doesn't help the wings that much beyond the 1st rounder. You need to find the right piece that would make the wings consider it.
Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 16, 2022 at 5:54 p.m.
Thread: Pens After trades
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>LetsGoPens69</b></div><div><blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Maybe a little surprise that Pettersson is so high in this ranking. But he deserves to be there in our eyes. He was really, really good defensively this year. It's unbelievable for us that Sullivan didn't use him at PK much more. Underrated defensive defenseman for us. <a href="https://t.co/VCdPEMZZUt" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">pic.twitter.com/VCdPEMZZUt</a></p>— Andy &amp; Rono (@ARHockeyStats) <a href="https://twitter.com/ARHockeyStats/status/1541806647085043712?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">June 28, 2022</a></blockquote>

</div></div>

Personally I would have preferred Petterson over Chariot but that wasn't the choice Stevie Y made. But with that choice made they are committed to it, so one matter how good Petterson is he is no longer a fit in Detroit unless something changes.
Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 16, 2022 at 5:46 p.m.
Thread: Pens After trades
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>LetsGoPens69</b></div><div>Pens didn’t a LHD or RHD until they did..lol.

And Detroit rebuild seems to be just about over. Their signings this offseason proved that. I wouldn’t trust Maatta with 2nd pairing minutes anymore. But ok.

And Chiarot struggled with 1st pairing minutes and a 1st pairing role in Florida.

Larkin, Raymond and Seider seem like pieces to build around. And Hronek, Copp, and Bertuzzi are nice complimentary pieces(unless Bertuzzi gets dealt). With acouple more nice secondary pieces.

And waves of those prospects are gonna be coming through in a year or two.

You feel competitive this season with Maatta at 2nd pairing LHD??</div></div>


The Wings are not going to trade their only legit RD prospect for a LD upgrade now. Not with their depth of LD prospects and need to allow flexibility to tryout some of them in the NHL to see how they do.
Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 19, 2022 at 2:55 p.m.
Thread: Addressing RD
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>C_M_O_R</b></div><div>I’ve also recently heard Petry tied to Detroit. It doesn’t make sense for Detroit without a package and retention. Also, Hronek was in the rumor mill within the past year. It’s an attempt at putting plausible moving pieces together. Guri was one of the worst possible players in Bones’s coaching system. He’s a solid player that needs help on his small game.</div></div>

I just don't understand the motive for Detroit to make this deal. You only get older on D, you can argue which player is better until you blue in the face cause is isn't a gap worth the 2nd round pick. And Gurianov doesn't move the needle at all for Detroit just adding to the glut of winger the Red Wings have. So in total this deal cost the Wings a haul, doesn't address any of their needs (top 6 C, Top 4 LD) and adds to areas of the team already deep in.

As for the general debate about Petry it seems like the wings would acquire him if the price was low enough but I can't see the Habs moving him for the cost the Wings would want to pay. He just doesn't improve the team enough to warrant any major assets traded.
Forum: Armchair-GMMay 14, 2022 at 9:09 a.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 30, 2022 at 8:15 p.m.
Thread: Price LTIR knee is recurring issue
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>OlegP</b></div><div>What would make sense to you? Its a trade which is give and take. You only dont like it cause its not your idea. You simply take all the negative like a 34 year old comment despite Petry being a top4 RD which always goes for a bounty. No team doesnt need a top4 RD especially an anemic defensive team. That is such a lazy narrative. Zzzzz</div></div>

Or Petry is a nice piece for a team that doesn't have a top 4 right handed offensive defenseman. He replaces Hornek on Detroit, but he cost more, is older by a decade and most importantly adds little production in comparison to. No point in the Wings giving up future value for something they already have regardless of how anyone feels about said value.
Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 25, 2022 at 7:09 p.m.
Thread: Price and Weber Retire
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>palhal</b></div><div>Sure teams are supposed to be just 10% over the cap, but I'm guessing that is for active players. The had 5.25m Lupul and 5.25 on LTIR, that was 10.5m when the cap much lower. The Leafs still had signed players that played...andwherf very close to the cap for years.. Teams certainly aren't handcuffed by the cap if they have LTIR players

You're correct about the bonuses, when a team is able to pay them is affected by the usage of LTIR.

But here on CF. so many think short term LTIR or retirement is the fix to help a teams cap.</div></div>


That started for the Leafs in 16-17 and they only used 63,299 in LTIR they simply had a very cheap team that year. Then they used 5,763,198 in 17-18, so they never came close to the 10% LTIR cap.
Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 25, 2022 at 6:41 p.m.
Thread: Price and Weber Retire
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>CMcAvoy73</b></div><div>The description makes it sound like you think they’re retiring, rather than going on LTIR.

0% chance that happens. I think that would cost Price 31.25M, and Weber, 6M. They aren’t doing that. There is a chance that neither play again and spend the next four years on LTIR, but LTIR doesn’t exactly equate to “free cap space.” It can be used, so it is very useful, but it isn’t exactly the same.</div></div>

LTIRetirement will also not work for the Habs with both or even just Price. Since you can only be over the cap by 10% in the offseason (8.25 this year) you would have a team cap of about 72 million not 82.5 million if both wound up on LTIR. And that is before accounting for any bonuses from this year that will roll over.
Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 16, 2022 at 4:06 p.m.
Thread: my gm
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>leafs101</b></div><div>Not a big deal at all. Just said that I'm not using logic, and i'm wondering how its not a logical idea. That's all. I'm not necessarily right, and maybe that veteran presence isn't what the Wings or other younger teams go for. Just a hockey debate that's all, nobody has to agree. Purely for fun.</div></div>

Muzzin can not be moved before free agency shakes out. Ian Cole is a UFA will have a lower cap hit (more then likely), the same age, less injury concerns, and same type of physical presents on the back end. CAR is going to be hard pressed to resign him this offseason. Other names that come to mind if this is the impact you are looking for are Nutivaara, Zadorov, and Chiarot. Then there are the trade targets none are the same as Muzzin but offer some of the same things at a lot lower of a cost then this ask.