SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

Amakiir

Member Since
Jun. 19, 2019
Favourite Team
Toronto Maple Leafs
Forum Posts
105
Posts per Day
0.1
Forum: Armchair-GMAug. 26, 2020 at 2:00 p.m.
Thread: Leafs Can Stop Sucking I hope
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Amakiir</b></div><div>It's one thing to say Marner doesn't fit your team, it's another to say they're worth the same. We'll see what happens but I think Pulock signs a 2 year deal. I'll take your word for it that it'll still be 6-6.5M. I'm not sure if Nylander would be a good comp then, Nylander still has a lot of upside. And holy **** would he do well under Trotz. Scare the lazy out of his bones. As for your D game, I've heard Islanders fans split on this. You guys have too much D and need offensive help.

I will say, based on what you're saying, I see what you're saying about the value here being way too low. Thanks</div></div>

I didnt say anything about Marners value, just that I wouldnt do the trade 1 for 1. However I was implying that its not out of the ball park value wise. I think higher than Nylander, Lower than Marner. Im not sure that Nylander can play in Trotz's style. Trotz and Lou ask you to sacrifice personal for team. If you can buy in you can thrive, if not you sink. The Islanders do have too much D, right now its a LHD abundance until Dobson can take a top 4 spot, then it will be a RHD abundance. Pulock and Mayfield are 2 very important pieces for the team right now, niether one can be replaced internally till Dobson is ready.
I dont think the Islanders will do anything short term with Pulock, I think you go short with Barzal and long with Pulock. Barzal will play against the short term deal while hoping for a bigger contract after the Covid affected CAP ends. 3 years or less at 7-8 Million now, 9-10 later.
Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 13, 2020 at 7:26 p.m.
Thread: Leafs Doo Doo Solved
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>L_FACTOR</b></div><div>1) feel free to send me your recommendations
2) yes Marner is better but the trade comes with 3 picks. Not sure you saw that. And if you feel the compensation isn't right then bump one up.
3) <a href="/users/firezfurx" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">@firezfurx</a> <a href="/users/justaBoss" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">@justaBoss</a> <a href="/users/JaredOfLondon" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">@JaredOfLondon</a> <a href="/users/aadoyle" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">@aadoyle</a>
Same goes for you, I'd like to see your recommendations. Instead of being fan boys, I'd make the tough decision to get rid of Marner so we can actually solve the D problem. Raps won making that sacrifice.</div></div>

I have no issues with trading Marner, I was just questioning that <a href="/users/rob32sjsharks" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">@rob32sjsharks</a> guy since he claimed Kane was a better player than Marner, therefore, he wouldn’t do the trade from a Sharks perspective. Your team is good except Pietrangelo doesn’t sign. He wants 10-11 Million for 6-7 years.