SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

Arom5477

Member Since
Jun. 17, 2016
Favourite Team
Pittsburgh Penguins
Forum Posts
1695
Posts per Day
0.6
Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 16, 2021 at 3:59 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMAug. 31, 2021 at 11:58 a.m.
Thread: Looking At Missing Playoffs Possible TDL
The price for Pettersson is probably dead on, but like you said, not sure if MTL would be interested. I'm sure it all hinges on the future of Chiarot.

I don't think Seattle does that trade. Blackwell just had a better season than Zucker and is cheaper for the moment.

The Tampa trade? I think there's something there. I feel it needs to be tweaked, but not sure how. My guess is Bolts fans will say no way because of Foote and I don't think Hextall moves a 2nd at this point even though it means getting two firsts.

Buffalo... I think yo'd have lower the price to a 3rd unless Jarry has a strong season.

The Boston trade looks good IMO, but obviously that depends on what Boston's needs are come the deadline.

I think the Florida trade is fair, but I suspect FLA fans will cry.
Forum: Armchair-GMAug. 13, 2020 at 9:38 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 5, 2020 at 11:25 a.m.
Thread: I Saw A Strome Trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Arom5477</b></div><div>Care to elaborate?</div></div>

I'm not convinced that Matt Murray's history says he's going to be the guy that can consistently be the #1 starter. 2016 good year, 2017 bad year, 2018 good year, 2019 bad year. None of us know how well he'll play in 2020. We can guess, but we don't know. What we all do know...he's going to want relatively big money because he has 2 cups which is really good. I'm not willing to give up a whole lot (at all quite frankly) for a goalie (not a ton of trade value in general)...that's going to want relatively big money...and I can't say he's better than Corey Crawford...IN FACT...

Speaking about Corey Crawford... He was FAR better than Murray last year. Like Night and Day. Corey 100% can't play 55+ games a year, but the Hawks don't need him to be that. They need him to play a tandem role and save him for the playoffs. He was Literally the best goalie in the ENTIRE NHL when it came to high danger situations. Link Below. He's still a REALLY good goalie. I'd prefer to give away ZERO assets and extend Crow to a 2 year deal. I'd certainly draft a goalie this year for sure. They do need to stock their system, but to the point...I just don't think Matt Murray is the solution for the long term.

<a href="https://www.naturalstattrick.com/playerteams.php?stdoi=g" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">https://www.naturalstattrick.com/playerteams.php?stdoi=g</a>
Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 10, 2020 at 2:12 p.m.
Thread: Changes That Need to Be Made
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Arom5477</b></div><div>Over the past three seasons, here is the breakdown b/w Letang and Carlson on who had better statistical and analytical performances:
Games played: Carlson (231 vs 204)
TOI: Carlson (3971 vs 3826)
CF%: <strong>Letang</strong> (53% vs 50%)
FF%: <strong>Letang</strong> (53% vs 49%)
SF% <strong>Letang</strong> (54% vs 50%)
GF%: Carlson (55% vs 50%)
xGF%: <strong>Letang</strong> (54% vs 48%)
SCF%:<strong> Letang</strong> (54% vs 50%)
HDCF%: <strong>Letang</strong> (53% vs 47%)
HDGF%: <strong>Letang</strong> (49% vs 46%)
MDCF%: <strong>Letang</strong> (55% vs 53%)
MDGF%: Carlson (65% vs 50%)
LDCF%: <strong>Letang</strong> (53% vs 51%)
LDGF%: Carlson (72% vs 53%)
PDO (higher number means the more luck the respective player had): <strong>Letang</strong>: .988 vs Carlson: 1.020

TLDR: Letang, over the last three seasons, has been better offensively and defensively than Carlson.

**Data came from Natural Stat Trick**</div></div>
Thank you