SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

Bbpagewolf

Iceman
Member Since
Jun. 25, 2019
Favourite Team
Anaheim Ducks
2nd Favourite Team
New York Rangers
Forum Posts
749
Posts per Day
0.4
Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 9 at 8:58 p.m.
For the trades, I like the addition of Colton, but I get the sense that we’ll probably have to add a 3rd round pick in this deal. Moving up in the draft is something the Ducks should consider if it’s possible, but MBN wouldn’t be my target. I’m more interested in someone like Tij Iginla, who I think could end up being the steal of the first round for whoever gets him. I don’t like this Laine trade. I’m not against acquiring him and I’m all for getting Strome out of here, but given Laine’s injury history I don’t think we’ll need to give up a 1st at all. In all honesty we may even be able to get something else back as well be it a mid-low round pick or a B-C tier prospect if we really play this correctly. But the pick should be a conditional 2nd that maybe becomes a 1st if Laine plays a certain percentage of games. As for the signings, LaCombe is more likely a 2 year signing at about $50,000-$200,000 less on the AAV. To be honest I’m not as sold on him as everyone else is right now, and I think he needs to prove himself more. With Lundestrom, I’m conflicted. Personally I think he’s down to his last chance to really make an impact with this team. More likely scenario is a one year deal, but maybe the AAV is a bit higher to compensate. Vaakanainen probably gets slightly less AAV and one less year, but Leason I think is on point and in my opinion he should be the RFA the Ducks value most as he has potential to be a valuable asset for this team once they start winning. And then there’s Lindstrom…I’m honestly not a fan. I haven’t been that impressed with him and I don’t think we should re-sign him. I’d rather sign other RHD’s in free agency or find another piece to trade Colorado for Colton and give Helleson a shot. Gauthier’s getting $950,000 AAV, that’s not even a debate. As for the two UFA signings, Joshua is intriguing for sure, but I think we can get him for cheaper. I don’t want Brett Pesce. Too expensive and has a big injury history which the Ducks don’t need anymore of. Matt Roy would be my preferred RHD option. Cheaper and imo better for his value.
Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 2 at 12:13 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 2 at 10:51 a.m.
Thread: Offseason
Forum: Armchair-GMAug. 17, 2023 at 5:17 p.m.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Goorts</b></div><div>As nice as it would be to have Kemell NHL ready this season, my guess is he starts in the minors. Kiefer Sherwood had a good end of last season, and I could see him being an opening day starter.

Gurianov is likely 3rd line RW
Sissons is 4th line Centre
Parssinen gets some time at LW on the 3rd line
Yakov &amp; Sherwood are the wingers on the 4th line with Sissons, to make a strong Defense first grinder line.
I think Barrie slides to 3rd pairing, with Fabbro getting 2nd pair minutes.
Glass and Novak are likely interchangeable, and wouldn't surprise me that by mid season one of them is top line and O'Reilly is 2nd line C.

Definitely a lot of moving parts in this roster... I'm intrigued to see who actually takes the next step forward.</div></div>
I can see Kemell getting a 9 game tryout to start the season. He was dominant both in Finland and with Milwaukee last season, so if he puts together a strong training camp and preseason, then he’ll get a shot on the opening night roster, if for no other reason than they desperately need a goal scorer and he projects to be one in the near future. Barrie’s gonna start the season on the 2nd D pair. He’s still one of the better offensive defensemen out there and Fabbro didn’t really have that impressive of a season last year. So I doubt an 11 point defenseman will play over a 55 point defenseman overnight. Barrie’s really gonna have to struggle in order for that to happen.
Forum: Armchair-GMAug. 9, 2023 at 5:02 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMAug. 6, 2023 at 8:48 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMAug. 6, 2023 at 4:51 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMMay 9, 2023 at 7:58 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMMay 9, 2023 at 10:54 a.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMMay 9, 2023 at 8:27 a.m.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Victor24</b></div><div>Guentzel is worth a mid 1st and an A prospect.
Here I see a protected 1st making it mid to low, 2 B prospects, and a negative value goalie.

Let me qualify the last piece. I like Gibson and think he is a candidate for change of scenery but, he has been negative value for 5 years straight. He is a risk. For a team like the Pens, they can't take a risk unless they aren't paying much for it.

Overall, this is an underpay for Guentzel.

That said, I agree with Landro, it doesn't make sense for Ana either. Unless you believe Guentzel will resign in Ana which I would not.</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>OldNYIfan</b></div><div>You must think that we're a serious contender like Tampa, to be paying all of that for a rental. But then, would a serious contender be trading away its starting goaltender for the next four seasons?

Guentzel might be worth a first, a roster player and a prospect to a team that traditionally pays a lot for contention, but Anaheim isn't one of those teams.</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>OldNYIfan</b></div><div>You must think that we're a serious contender like Tampa, to be paying all of that for a rental. But then, would a serious contender be trading away its starting goaltender for the next four seasons?

Guentzel might be worth a first, a roster player and a prospect to a team that traditionally pays a lot for contention, but Anaheim isn't one of those teams.</div></div>
That’s why I said the key point of the trade is that Guentzel signs an extension. This would not be a rental. If Guentzel wouldn’t agree to sign an extension, the trade doesn’t happen.
Forum: Armchair-GMDec. 21, 2022 at 5:06 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMDec. 20, 2022 at 6:47 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMDec. 18, 2022 at 2:18 p.m.