DISPLAY SETTING
Toggle Dark Mode
Automatic Theme
BETTING ODDS
Odds Enabled
LOCALE
FR
LOGIN
REGISTER
FORUMS
ARCHIVE ▾
ARCHIVE
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
CBA ▾
CBA
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
LTIR FAQ
Buyout FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ODDS
19
SCOUTING
CALCULATORS ▾
CALCULATORS
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
Injury History
TOOLS ▾
TOOLS
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Team Affiliates
Professional Tryouts
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
PLAYERS ▾
PLAYERS
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
TEAMS ▾
WESTERN CONFERENCE
PACIFIC
Anaheim Ducks
Calgary Flames
Edmonton Oilers
Los Angeles Kings
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
CENTRAL
Arizona Coyotes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Dallas Stars
Minnesota Wild
Nashville Predators
St. Louis Blues
Winnipeg Jets
EASTERN CONFERENCE
METROPOLITAN
Carolina Hurricanes
Columbus Blue Jackets
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
Washington Capitals
ATLANTIC
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Detroit Red Wings
Florida Panthers
Montreal Canadiens
Ottawa Senators
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
INTERACTIVE ▾
INTERACTIVE FEATURES
Armchair-GM (Custom Roster Simulator)
Mock Draft (Entry Draft Simulator)
Trade Machine (Trade Proposal Simulator)
SEARCH
ARMCHAIR-GM
MOCK-DRAFT
TRADE MACHINE
TEAMS ▾
Anaheim Ducks
Arizona Coyotes
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Calgary Flames
Carolina Hurricanes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Columbus Blue Jackets
Dallas Stars
Detroit Red Wings
Edmonton Oilers
Florida Panthers
Los Angeles Kings
Minnesota Wild
Montreal Canadiens
Nashville Predators
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Ottawa Senators
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
St. Louis Blues
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
Washington Capitals
Winnipeg Jets
PLAYERS ▾
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
TOOLS ▾
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Professional Tryouts
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
Team Affiliates
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
CALCULATORS ▾
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
SCOUTING REPORTS
ODDS
CBA▾
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
Buyout FAQ
LTIR FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ARCHIVE ▾
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
FORUMS
LOGIN
REGISTER
FR
Toggle Dark Mode
Odds Enabled
BenderFlexoFry
Member Since
May 23, 2018
Favourite Team
Pittsburgh Penguins
2nd Favourite Team
Winnipeg Jets
Forum Posts
44
Posts per Day
0.0
POSTS
THREADS
LIKES
ARMCHAIR-GM TEAMS
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 20, 2018 at 4:23 p.m.
Thread:
Predators 2018-19
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GMTD</b></div><div>Five stars for any one who wants a bottom 6 forward from Buffalo. Well Larsson, Wilson and Rodrigues are all somewhat desirable.</div></div>
It was more about clearing out Bonino.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 20, 2018 at 4:21 p.m.
Thread:
Bruins 2018-19
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Codyymd16</b></div><div>i dont see Joe signing with the bruins, hes made it clear that hes interested in resigning</div></div>
Would be cool to see though.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 11, 2018 at 6:41 p.m.
Thread:
sabres
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Jdfitz77</b></div><div>Ahhhhh... ok, that makes much more sense then
Idk about another tank year though?
1) it’s probably time to start winning
2) that lineup probably has us closer to the playoffs than it does a bottom5 pick
3) Vanek didn’t even get a pick at the deadline last year (and the prospect they got is a bottom6 guy at best)...
so idk if he or Pommer or McGinn would even get us anything at the deadline anyways?
Maybe some low round picks- and if that’s the case,
I’d rather “tank” with letting some of the kids play & hopefully develop</div></div>
Good point, I forgot how little Vancouver got for Vanek. I don't think Buffalo is ready to compete for a playoff spot, but you're probably right about getting some younger players in the lineup.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 11, 2018 at 4:01 p.m.
Thread:
sabres
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Jdfitz77</b></div><div>U certainly addressed our need at LW
However, i don’t like any of your choices
Especially Vanek & McGinn
Our GM & scouts have been on local radio numerous times saying how we wanna get “faster”
Those 2 guys are far from it
So i just don’t see those moves happening</div></div>
Yeah these moves definitely do not make them faster. I saw it as one more tank year and they can trade Vanek, Wilson, McGinn, and Pominville at the deadline for a bunch of picks.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 11, 2018 at 3:55 p.m.
Thread:
Nyqvist to CGY
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>cberg</b></div><div>Hmmm. The Calgary trade is the type you really have to consider, as it gives them a scoring winger which is one of the things that they need, and gives up guys they haven't gotten too invested in yet, but are just arrived or on the verge. Unfortunately, since Nyquist is not right hand shot and only has 1 year till UFA, and really isn't an elite winger, I doubt they would do a 3 for 1 deal. Personally I dislike throwing massive quantity at deals because it depletes your depth too drastically, but if everything else was aligned might make an exception. The easiest way to balance it out is to add in a pick, say the Ottawa 2018 2nd and then it becomes much more attractive as they would have to figure they could get a good player with reasonable potential, albeit delayed versus what they are giving up. It also fills a hole in their drafts this year. Throwing in the Vegas 1st would likely seal the deal.
The other nice thing about the deal is it recognizes exactly where the Flames are at this moment, ie Kylington is really an A level prospect probably ready to step in this year, but also so young he could get another year in the AHL, and he's competing with 2-3 others so its not decimating to their line-up. Klimchuk is also an A level prospect with very good all-around skills also on the verge who could step in right away, but hasn't yet with the Flames. And finally, although Rittich was up and down last season, he's clearly past the AHL and played very well for extended periods last season and could easily fit in as a solid back-up, while remaining at Calgary is Gillies who could do the same for the Flames and might be best for them because their prospects are starting to pile up and they need to find out, soon exactly what they have at the next level.</div></div>
I saw Detroit as a good team for Calgary to deal with, as they don't have many draft picks to offer and Detroit doesn't really need any more this year. I didn't really think Klimchuk was that much of a prospect anymore, so that's why I threw him in there as the third piece. I would rather take him out than add a pick going to Calgary.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 9, 2018 at 3:03 p.m.
Thread:
Moving up with Ottawa
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>buchnevichh</b></div><div>And knowing how much Ottawa cares about money, sure they'd be very interested in moving Ryan without tagging him along in Karlson deal</div></div>
Exactly. It would allow them to get a much better return for Karlsson.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 9, 2018 at 2:55 p.m.
Thread:
Moving up with Ottawa
I think this is an interesting idea. Ottawa gets rid of Ryan, while still getting someone like Boqvist or Wahlstrom. For the NYR to do it I think Zadina has to be available at 4, I don't think Tkachuk or anyone else would be worth the move up.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 8, 2018 at 7:40 p.m.
Thread:
Trade with NYI
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Subbanator7667</b></div><div>I was even thinking Boqvist, Smith, Hayton. Pretty much drafting your future top pairing and 2C behind Barzal. Your next 10 years is set.</div></div>
I would be fine with that. Lots of options for them with those 3 picks.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 8, 2018 at 7:18 p.m.
Thread:
Trade with NYI
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Subbanator7667</b></div><div>I think NY takes that. They can bury Hossa on LTIR and get a center if Tavares leaves and a top 10 pick to add to their other two top 15 picks.</div></div>
Yeah, that's what I was thinking. They could end up with something like Boqvist, Veleno, and Hayton, which would be a solid haul.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 8, 2018 at 7:15 p.m.
Thread:
Trade with NYI
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>tankbarzal</b></div><div>Lou laughs at that</div></div>
Considering Lee only has one year left and there are other LW options out there (JVR, Pacioretty, Hoffman, etc.), I think this is good value for the Isles if they want to go full rebuild. Ho-Sang doesn't necessarily have to be in there, it could be a different prospect.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 8, 2018 at 7:00 p.m.
Thread:
Rebuild without Tavares
8th overall pick is nothing?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 6, 2018 at 10:43 p.m.
Thread:
Oilers 2019-19
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Oilfan1717</b></div><div>This team is better than the Oilers were last year. It still needs help at D - I suggest moving the Oilers 2018 first and a prospect for a guy like Faulk or, better yet, Porayko.
Also, I don’t give Nurse dollars and term after one strong season; let’s bridge him and see what we have after 2-3 years.</div></div>
I wanted to focus more on forward depth, as I think that's what really killed them last year. With their 2018 1st hopefully they can get one of Dobson, Bouchard or Boqvist, which might not help next year, but will help out the D long term.
I'm not a big fan of bridge deals. I think Edmonton should get Nurse locked up now, or else they'll be paying him a lot more in a couple years.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 5, 2018 at 2:32 p.m.
Thread:
Bjustad to VAN, Add Kovalchuk
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>DomCholette</b></div><div>Why trading a young Top6 Bjugstad for a 13th F and a 5th D?
I think this should land you Tanev from Van and remove the 2nd td pick.
= Bjug + McGinn for Tanev</div></div>
This clears out some salary for Florida and opens up the 2RW spot for Tippet and 3C for Borgstrom. I expect Vancouver to finish near the bottom again next year, so the 2nd is almost like a late 1st. I also like Hutton, and think he's a valuable addition.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 5, 2018 at 2:19 p.m.
Thread:
Bjustad to VAN, Add Kovalchuk
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Kosterjr</b></div><div>I wouldn’t sign Petrovic I’d trade him and promote Josh Brown. Especially after signing Bogdan.</div></div>
I think it's important to have depth, especially on defense. I don't know much about Josh Brown though.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 5, 2018 at 1:08 a.m.
Thread:
Karlsson + Ryan to NJD
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Goulet</b></div><div>You're an Ottawa fan making that trade?</div></div>
No, I'm pretty neutral in this case. I think if Ottawa is going to trade Karlsson they aren't going to do much better than this, especially with getting rid of Ryan included.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 1, 2018 at 8:41 p.m.
Thread:
Trade with NYR
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BurnEmUp</b></div><div>Also, I've used the Brouwer/Smith idea on here a few times. I like it, but I think the above proposal with Rangers needs some picks going to CGY.
1. I think Brodie having 2 years left compared to Zucc having one year left needs some insurance. Like the Flames get a 2020 3rd if he doesn't re-sign with us and we don't trade him.
2. I think we need another 3rd from 2018 or 2019 coming our way because Smith A) spent most of the season in the AHL last year and B) has a 3rd year on his contract, where as Brouwer has only two. Flames are taking a bigger risk here in my opinion.</div></div>
The Rangers sure lost faith in Smith fast. He played 44 games with them this year, and he wasn't even that bad. I think he's worth taking the chance on for Calgary, even with the extra year, versus keeping Brouwer and likely playing him on the 4th line.
I can see a pick going Calgary's way to account for Brodie's extra year, but I can also see Calgary as the more desperate team in the trade (assuming they strike out in free agency). Either way, I think this is a pretty good base for a deal.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 1, 2018 at 7:55 p.m.
Thread:
Trade with NYR
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>wabit</b></div><div>Wild take that and run.</div></div>
I think it works for Calgary too, they have the cap room to spare and they don't have much for picks in the 2018 draft.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 1, 2018 at 7:00 p.m.
Thread:
Trade with NYR
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ragsandbluesfan</b></div><div>Deal from NY</div></div>
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Hedman77</b></div><div>I like this a lot for both teams</div></div>
Thanks. I think Zuccarello would be a really good fit on Calgary's top line, and Brodie is a big upgrade for the Rangers top 4.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 1, 2018 at 6:28 p.m.
Thread:
Jets 2018-19
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>palhal</b></div><div>The Leafs thank you for added 3.150 m cap hit for an inferior back up.</div></div>
You're welcome. There's also the pick upgrade in there to try to make it worth it.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 31, 2018 at 2:43 p.m.
Thread:
Trades with LAK, TOR, and NYR
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Hackadart16</b></div><div>Pesce is more like what toronto will be looking for rather than an offensive defenseman like faulk.. we had two 50 point defenseman but they cant play defence</div></div>
I understand Toronto would rather Pesce, I just don't think Carolina would move him.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 30, 2018 at 10:57 p.m.
Thread:
Trades with LAK, TOR, and NYR
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Hackadart16</b></div><div>Swap faulk for Pesce and Kapanen for brown and then i could get behind the leafs trade as a leafs fan</div></div>
I can see the Brown part working, but not Pesce heading out.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 30, 2018 at 10:54 p.m.
Thread:
Trades with LAK, TOR, and NYR
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>palhal</b></div><div>I think there is this fascination about ANY RHD being so good, especially if he is comes to the Leafs. But really having Faulk (and he really that wasn't good last year) for a first and Kapanen sure hurts the Leaf future. Kapanen looks to a starting second or third line winger. That's just my take, that these short terms gain for a rebuilding team (I still say the Leafs are rebuilding) aren't what the Leafs are looking for.
And the Skinner trade....these extension rarely happen, but they seem so in vogue on CapFriendly.</div></div>
I guess that might be the biggest difference, is I see Toronto being more aggresive with Matthews and Marner still on their ELCs. If they're still sort of rebuilding then pretty low chance of Kapanen moving.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 26, 2018 at 1:32 p.m.
Thread:
Trades with LAK, TOR, and NYR
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>CanesQue</b></div><div>Definitely not Hanifin and I might even argue that 1Rd should be a 2Rd, but this is a solid Armchair post!</div></div>
Thanks! Seeing the 7x7 extension Kane signed with SJS reminds me that a player like Krieder has a lot of value in the league, so I didn't want to undersell him. And I agree, Carolina isn't going to include Hanifin.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 26, 2018 at 1:17 p.m.
Thread:
Trades with LAK, TOR, and NYR
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>palhal</b></div><div>Don't know why the Kings would trade 4 years of Carter for one year of Skinner. Faulk and Hainsey are about the same for a year. Then you in effect the Leafs are trading Kapanen and first for one year of Faulk. Way too much for the Leafs to give up.</div></div>
From the LAK perspective, I saw it as them trying to get younger and a little more dynamic, but I can see how giving up 4 years for 1 may be a little much. I thought about skipping the conditional picks and having Skinner sign an extension as part of the deal, but conditional picks are fun.
With the TOR trade, as a neutral fan I think that a 1st and top prospect are definitely needed to get a RHD like Faulk. I originally had Carrick in instead of Hainsey, but switched to shed a bit of cap for the Leafs. If it was a 1st, 4th, Kapanen and Carrick do you think that makes more sense?
SalarySwish
| NBA Salary Caps by CapFriendly
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Forum Rules
About
CBA FAQ
Contact Us
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com