DISPLAY SETTING
Toggle Dark Mode
Automatic Theme
BETTING ODDS
Odds Enabled
LOCALE
FR
LOGIN
REGISTER
FORUMS
ARCHIVE ▾
ARCHIVE
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
CBA ▾
CBA
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
LTIR FAQ
Buyout FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ODDS
SCOUTING
CALCULATORS ▾
CALCULATORS
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
Injury History
TOOLS ▾
TOOLS
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Team Affiliates
Professional Tryouts
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
PLAYERS ▾
PLAYERS
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
TEAMS ▾
WESTERN CONFERENCE
PACIFIC
Anaheim Ducks
Calgary Flames
Edmonton Oilers
Los Angeles Kings
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
CENTRAL
Arizona Coyotes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Dallas Stars
Minnesota Wild
Nashville Predators
St. Louis Blues
Winnipeg Jets
EASTERN CONFERENCE
METROPOLITAN
Carolina Hurricanes
Columbus Blue Jackets
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
Washington Capitals
ATLANTIC
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Detroit Red Wings
Florida Panthers
Montreal Canadiens
Ottawa Senators
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
INTERACTIVE ▾
INTERACTIVE FEATURES
Armchair-GM (Custom Roster Simulator)
Mock Draft (Entry Draft Simulator)
Trade Machine (Trade Proposal Simulator)
SEARCH
ARMCHAIR-GM
MOCK-DRAFT
TRADE MACHINE
TEAMS ▾
Anaheim Ducks
Arizona Coyotes
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Calgary Flames
Carolina Hurricanes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Columbus Blue Jackets
Dallas Stars
Detroit Red Wings
Edmonton Oilers
Florida Panthers
Los Angeles Kings
Minnesota Wild
Montreal Canadiens
Nashville Predators
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Ottawa Senators
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
St. Louis Blues
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
Washington Capitals
Winnipeg Jets
PLAYERS ▾
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
TOOLS ▾
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Professional Tryouts
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
Team Affiliates
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
CALCULATORS ▾
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
SCOUTING REPORTS
ODDS
CBA▾
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
Buyout FAQ
LTIR FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ARCHIVE ▾
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
FORUMS
LOGIN
REGISTER
FR
Toggle Dark Mode
Odds Enabled
BigE
Go Jets, Go Hawks
Member Since
May 25, 2018
Forum Posts
320
Posts per Day
0.1
POSTS
THREADS
LIKES
ARMCHAIR-GM TEAMS
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Wed. at 2:49 p.m.
Thread:
Amazing Draft
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>wojme</b></div><div>Sabres with zero reason to trade back</div></div>
Just used them as a placeholder - I'm seeing Eiserman go a few picks later than 10 right now. Hawks have a ton of picks in the next 3 drafts to use as assets.... Also I've read in a few places that the consensus of this draft is that after the first 5 picks, there isn't much of a difference to mid 2nd round....so, if this is true, the Sabres or any other team could be tempted to stockpile more picks and still get the same value with later picks.
Forum:
Repêchage Simulé
Wed. at 2:24 p.m.
Thread:
Corey Pronman's April Ranking
If Eiserman does indeed fall to 14/mid-1st, I truly hope the Hawks trade some of their draft capital to move up to get him. Bedard, Eiserman, whoever they get at 1-4 will be very good.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jul. 14, 2023 at 10:22 a.m.
Thread:
Canuck Deal
I think Vacouver considers without the 1st rounder. Myers straight to Chicago with the cap hit has been reported as a straight 2nd to Chicago.... in lieu of the 2nd and Kurashev and the other pieces they might get Boeser.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 30, 2023 at 12:26 p.m.
Thread:
Rangers keeping goodrow and going young bottom 6
If Lafs agent lets him sign that deal, he should be fired. At that AAV, his agent will find a team to offer sheet him....
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 28, 2023 at 4:46 p.m.
Thread:
Hawks get Bedard and Fantili
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>KDev</b></div><div>If the roles were flipped do you honestly think you would accept that trade? The answer is no</div></div>
A couple of points about your comment. I used actual real-world draft pick values to determine this trade and the Hawks actually give up a little more value than they receive, about a 3rd rounder on this. With that said, I believe Fantili to be the real deal, and if he falls to 3 I personally wouldn't do this trade (because of Fantili, but otherwise I would)...unless, I was only worried about short-term and was in win-now mode, which Columbus is in. Could they take a few of those picks and a prospect and turn it into Konecky out of Phily? Probably. Could they bring in a 3rd team and trade these picks in order to get Sheifele out of Winnipeg? Probably.. (Winnipeg doesn't want picks for Sheif). Are either Konecky or Scheifele better than Fantili long-term...I don't think so but Scheif did score 42 last year. Are both better than Fantili next year - absolutely. This draft is historically good and very deep and those early 2nd rounders are very valuable.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 1, 2023 at 2:07 p.m.
Thread:
Laffy or no
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Despise</b></div><div>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_NHL_players_who_have_signed_offer_sheets</div></div>
https://www.sportsnet.ca/nhl/article/nhl-raising-salary-thresholds-for-2022-offer-sheet-compensation/
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 30, 2023 at 10:24 p.m.
Thread:
Laffy or no
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Despise</b></div><div>we can afford and we'll force him to play RW until he likes it</div></div>
You can't afford him at 4.3M.... and you have no idea how absolutely miserable a team like the Blackhawks could make the Rangers this offseason.....Drury should have made a handshake deal with the Hawks for the Kane trade for a 1st, that the Hawks wouldn't offer sheet any Rangers RFA's.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 12, 2023 at 1:59 p.m.
Thread:
Everyonehatesus
Both Miller and Laff get offer sheets at that salary. Also, this team is over the cap because the Rangers have bonus carryover from this year. I don't see how you are going to be able to keep both Miller and Laff this off-season.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 12, 2023 at 1:52 p.m.
Thread:
Big NYR trade and retool
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BroadwayBlueshirts</b></div><div>Panarin isn't a cap dump lmao he still had 92 points last szn. Rangers don't even trade Laff for Tampa's pick either</div></div>
Then prepare for Laff to get an offer sheet and receive a 2nd rounder in comp. There is no way the Rangers will sign Laff for anything less than 4.3 mill. as a 21-year-old RFA and former 1st OA. Panarin is 31 years old now, and yes - he had another good regular season - but his salary today makes him almost untradeable, soon it will be even worse. This is the Rangers chance to get out from under the cap hell that will plague them for awhile.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 12, 2023 at 1:16 p.m.
Thread:
Necessary Changes
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Hammerwise</b></div><div>PHI probably says yes.
I think NYR is better served trying to offload a contract with Laf, say Hayes at 50% and Ristolinen (arent you glad I didnt say DeAngelo?) for Trouba and Laf, or Goodrow and Laf for Hayes at 50% and Allison</div></div>
Agreed, this is similar to what Chicago did when they tried to get rid of Bickells contract back in the day - they ended up having to throw in Terravainen to do so. There are a few teams out there that have the cap space to take on a big contract and give the Rangers some flexibility. This is the better option that losing Laff for a 2nd rounder in an offer sheet.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 12, 2023 at 12:59 p.m.
Thread:
Rangers
This is pretty good - but if the Rangers plan on signing Laff to that low of contract, expect him to get an offer sheet - anything less than 4.2 is a 2nd round comp.... lot of teams will take a 2nd round flyer on him.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 11, 2023 at 10:12 a.m.
Thread:
Bedard
Finally, someone understands what it would take to get the #1 pick, this is similar to the Lindros haul minus the 15Mill (I think it was 15mill - going off memory). I'm a Hawks fan and I submitted a trade proposal on here except with the Canucks and was laughed off.....of course, a trade like this is likely never to happen again. If were the Hawks GM though, I'd be intrigued by this offer for sure.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 9, 2023 at 6:35 p.m.
Thread:
panzer
This draft is really deep - very little difference in players outside of the top 7, all the way to the end of the 3rd round. Trading 3 picks for a player at 14 that doesn't isn't going to be much better than a 3rd rounder isn't going to work - throw the NHL draft value guides out with this draft - it's really deep with excellent value outside of goalies everywhere.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 9, 2023 at 6:27 p.m.
Thread:
Marner to Chicago
As a Hawks fan, I'd say yes to the trade - but keep the salary retained and change the 1st to one of the early 2nds.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 9, 2023 at 6:23 p.m.
Thread:
Laff Trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>DQ42</b></div><div>Drury counters with Carpenter and Vesey for 2023 1st</div></div>
Good luck fitting Laff and 4.3 million under the cap - cause otherwise he is absolutely an offer sheet candidate. I'd love to see the Hawks offer both he and Miller twin 4.2 million offer sheets and watch Drury and every Rangers fan sweat as they realized they just lost the #1 OA pick for a 2nd rounder because they overpaid for Panarin and Trouba....even if he matches the Rangers are absolutely screwed. Good luck.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 9, 2023 at 11:48 a.m.
Thread:
Laff Trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Onlyfairtrades1</b></div><div>Absurd offer, Drury doesn't even take the call.</div></div>
Absurd comment.... he absolutely takes the call because the Rangers have cap issues... they can't spend up the limit next year because of bonuses this year.... go make a Rangers team with a cap limit of 80-81 million and if you think the Rangers sign Laff to 2 million bucks, I got a offer sheet waiting for you. Compensation for any RFA signed from 2.1 to 4.2 is 1 2nd rounder. Now that I think about it the 2nd and 4th is more than enough unless the Rangers plan to sign him for more than 4.2+
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 9, 2023 at 10:49 a.m.
Thread:
Laff Trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>exo2769</b></div><div>This won't get it done, but it's worth a conversation with Drury.</div></div>
What about the 20th pick? I thought that might be a bit too much, hence the 2nd and the 4th. Or the 35th and 56th pick?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 4, 2023 at 10:05 a.m.
Thread:
trying to keep everyone no kane or vladdy but it will have to do
Alexis gets an offer sheet at that salary - it's only a 2nd rounder as compensation....
You are also forgetting that the Rangers will likely have performance bonus overages that will reduce the total cap for them next year....Its likely their cap will be closer to 81 million....so this just isn't going to work.....You cannot keep both Laf and K'andre without trading Kreider of Trockeck.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 4, 2023 at 9:55 a.m.
Thread:
Just proof for a comment
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GM69</b></div><div>no, but there was a challenge that you couldn't get Laffy/Miller to 4.2m deals without making any trade.</div></div>
You do realize the Rangers have $3,700,000 in potential bonuses that will come out of next years salary cap, right? The Rangers will be lucky to have 80-81 Million in total cap space available.....which is one of the RFA signings.....You won't be able to sign both without trading Trocheck or Kreider...
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 4, 2023 at 9:49 a.m.
Thread:
habs rangers pt 1
For 2.2 million I can almost guarantee you the Hawks offer him 3+ million in an offer sheet and give up a 2nd rounder for him as compensation. The Rangers will need to find a way to offer him over $4,201,489 so the comp is a 1st and a 3rd or they will lose him. Same with K'Andre....Signing both will cost the Rangers a minimum of 8.4M+ combined...You guys are screwed...Shoot, the Hawks could offer sheet them both at 4.2 million and put the Rangers in a bad spot.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 3, 2023 at 4:33 p.m.
Thread:
1 overall traded to Vancouver
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mv21227</b></div><div>Fixed that for you</div></div>
Haha, I am a Blackhawk fan, but I wanted to model a trade that was similar to the Lindros trade and see what it came to from a Cap perspective - then decided to publish it. The Lindros trade of course was pre-cap days. This trade is ridiculous, but it is similar (despite a reply suggesting that Vancouver is giving up more), which is ludicrous. Of course, Bedard would be worth more to Vancouver than just about anyone else because he will sell out the arena for years to come being a hometown kid. With that said, the interesting question is, in a realistic trade scenario (given the teams actually get the draft position their standings currently dictate), the 2 1st's have to stay (1 of them being a swap this year)....I still think the Hawks would get 2 of the 3 from Boesser, Petterrson, and Hughes, no? So would Vancouver fans say yes to Boesser, Hughes, and 2 1st? I feel like that is more than fair, perhaps not enough...
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jul. 27, 2021 at 3:21 p.m.
Thread:
MAF traded to Pitt
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>RicXX</b></div><div>I could see either of those trades, but I think it will have to be 1st's to retain... or 2 2nds. I think just the 2nd is a little low.</div></div>
or a 2nd and a mid-level prospect?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jul. 27, 2021 at 3:20 p.m.
Thread:
Jets trade swap picks
Thought I would come back to the thread, I forgot about it but was trying to figure out what the Hawks are going to do with Strome and it popped in my head.....I just read an article that states Lundell may have had one of the best seasons of anyone not in the NHL. The Hawks never bought out Smith (as I rightly predicted).
As for Strome, there isn't a team in the league that would trade a 1st for him now....and I don't think any team would trade a 2nd for him unless the Hawks retain salary. That trade with Winnipeg would have at least resulted in a great future in goal for the Hawks, I'm not sold on Lankinen and clearly, neither are the Hawks with today's events...
Reading through this thread, I may have gone a bit too far....sorry for any name calling, ChiHawk.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ChiHawk</b></div><div>Seriously, stop the name calling. There are rules on the forums here and heavily enforced to keep this for adults to have healthy discussions and healthy debates which doesn't involve name calling. You may not agree with me and clearly i don't with your viewpoint, but in life in general when you resort to name calling it shows 1) immaturity and 2) weakness in your position; this is debate 101 stuff.
Ask all the Hawks fans on here, and there are 3 of us who are known to be the most knowledgeable about this team, that is what I said not the entire AGM forum so take it down a notch please.
Strome played 78 games last season at the age of 21. He missed 4 games when he was with AZ last season but played 100% of the games when he was a Blackhawk. Prior to last season, Arizona didn't play him a lot and mismanaged his development (AZ is known to do that) as evident of the success he's had since getting traded. The first injury he faced was this season and it was a week and a 1/2. Later he missed another week due to the flu. Strome does not have a injury history and one minor isolated incident does not take away from his value. Google is your friend.
In the last 2 seasons at the age of 21 and 22, he's put up .70ppg...that's pretty damn good and certainly worth a 1st round pick for a 2C, RFA who recently turned 23. A good comparison, for two similar centers potentially on the market is Cerelli and Domi. In the last two seasons...Cirelli = .55ppg (same age), Domi = .75ppg (age 25)
Your knocks against Strome starting in the offensive zone is a weak debate. Some of the greatest players in the league, make most of their starts in the offensive zone. Kane, Matthews, Marner, Laine, McDavid, etc. What's your point? The guy is a offensive player just like many big time guys who put up a ton of points. It's not a secret Strome is not very good defensively, it's like you pretend you just found the secret to how the earth was made. Good Lord guy
As for Lundell, The Athletic featured an article this morning on the most polarizing draft picks in the 1st round and featured ONLY 2 scout comments for each player; 1 scout high on the player and 1 scout low on the player. You should spend the $12 a year for some good insights into hockey and especially what the 2 most respected Hawks analysts have to say about the Hawks fans, buyouts and value of trades. Lundell has a 2C ceiling and a 3C floor, in other words low risk gamble despite what the scout in The Athletic said. Lundell is a defensive first player and doesn't have a lot of offense to his game despite a great wrister. He's not a very fast skater either. Those are the knocks against Lundell which is why he easily can be a 3C. If he can improve his speed and put together more offense then he'll be a 2C. It's a gamble either way you look at Lundell if what you absolutely need is a 2C. Why do you think so many Jets fans on here are trying to acquire Strome or Cerelli when it's pretty obvious lundell will be available at the #10 spot? Maybe because they realize, despite being the most NHL ready player in the top 12 of the draft, he has quite a bit of work if he's going to be a 3C.
You're the only person, professional analysts included, I've heard say the Hawks won't buy out Smith and move big assets to trade him. Maybe you're right or maybe you're an audience of one arguing something you're completely wrong on; time will tell. Bottom line, the Hawks are cornered on the cap nearly as much as you are trying to make it sound.
We'll gladly keep Strome, not trade him to move up 7 spots in the draft, and throw a 1 year qualifying offer at him or a 2 year $3.5M deal. If a team offer sheets him, Hawks match up to $4.3M at which point the Hawks gladly take a first and 3rd and move on.
Have a nice day.</div></div>
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 29, 2021 at 12:48 p.m.
Thread:
Draft and Offseason
You have the Hawks trading for Nolan Patrick but then not signing him? Also, I'd rather trade Keith than Murphy...
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 14, 2021 at 7:47 a.m.
Thread:
Next years trade deadline
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Mr_Canoehead</b></div><div>At next year's trade deadline, you might have to ask Seattle for Appleton, not Winnipeg.</div></div>
That's a good point and there are a number of Jets that Seattle could take. The Hawks may be able to get more than Appleton for Zadarov anyway.
1
2
Next
Page 1
SalarySwish
| NBA Salary Caps by CapFriendly
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Forum Rules
About
CBA FAQ
Contact Us
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com