BrianCampbell

Member Since

Aug. 11, 2021

Favourite Team

Chicago Blackhawks

Forum Posts

345

Posts per Day

0.4

Forum: Armchair-GM19 hours ago

Thread: Starters

Swap the picks and I could see the Hawks doing this. Im not sure they are sold on Soderblum and they want to be better next year. But they wont give up assets to get a backup goalie. They would rather just outbid if needed for UFA.

Forum: Armchair-GMThu. at 11:18 a.m.

Thread: Chicago Bedards

Sabres will never trade Tuch. He was one of the big pieces in the Eichel trade coming back, they wont trade him.

Forum: Armchair-GMThu. at 11:11 a.m.

Thread: Making tough choices for the future

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>SpiderSpiderSpider28</b></div><div>I based this value off of a Hawks fan who sold Reichel for a 4th</div></div>

Everyone has a fan who loves to overreact.

Hawks have nothing but time for Reichel and he's showed he's got what it takes (look at the last 20 games of 22-23). I think it would take a 1st or similar value to get him from the Hawks at this time. Also would have to be an asset other than LHD, they arguably already have their top 2 LHD in a 22 and 19 year old, with 3 other solid prospects left to fight for 3LD or learn to play their offside.

Forum: Armchair-GMThu. at 10:56 a.m.

Thread: Making tough choices for the future

0% Chance Hawks even consider that. Reichel has a higher ceiling and Hawks are stacked on young LHD.

Forum: Armchair-GMWed. at 9:37 a.m.

Thread: Wings 24

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Kyle_Davidson</b></div><div>The hawks would bail you out of Husso for the right price, but not interested in the Holl contract.</div></div>

I actually have no problem with either player. I like the upside on Husso as a backup better than our current situation, and I think Holl is a good 7D/3rd with lots of NHL experience to add to the locker room. BUT.. taking on 12m takes WAY more than a 3rd.

Forum: Armchair-GMWed. at 9:20 a.m.

Thread: EDM2425

Hawks accept that. They will need a 3RD next year and Ceci is someone with enough NHL experience he can be paired with a young guy to ease the growing pains. Also would be someone the Hawks dont mind if he's the 7th Dman. Cap doesnt bother them next year.

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 15 at 5:38 p.m.

Thread: McGroarty Says No to Winnipeg

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Howie</b></div><div>Yeah someone is not understanding of the situation whatsoever lol. Whatever you'd trade nazar add a 2nd and that's what it would be fair even tho jets don't trade him whatsoever. Still time to delete this btw</div></div>

Fair, but in this fantasy world the Jets have no leverage either. Gautier was Drysdale and a 2nd just a few months ago.

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 15 at 5:25 p.m.

Thread: McGroarty Says No to Winnipeg

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ggha777</b></div><div>They will get a better return than that.</div></div>

1st rounder instead of 2nd? Two 2nd round picks? Thoughts?

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 15 at 4:19 p.m.

Thread: very serious

Hawks accept. No takesys backsys.

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 28 at 11:36 a.m.

Thread: Hawks Draft redraft 2018-2021

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Logicalicesports</b></div><div>Any change in the earlier drafts would probably change their standings for later drafts. Not saying some changes cannot be made. But once you start getting better talent your draft picks may be higher and you may miss out on Bedard</div></div>

Agree, that's why I only went back a few years. But you're correct. Also gotta think if they draft better they dont trade Cat and maybe resign Kane. Crazy to think of the ifs and buts

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 25 at 10:39 a.m.

Thread: Twitter Trade

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>RazWild</b></div><div>Just to point out.

That's not how rounding works anyway. I know it's been 20+ years since I was in school. But I'm pretty sure math hasn't changed that much.

If the number is higher than 5, round up.

If the number is lower than 5, round down.

Given your dealing with TOI. The TOI of 19:33 rounds with the number 33, not 19, so it would round DOWN to 19 minutes not up to 20.

So ergo NOT 1/3.</div></div>

BRUH, go back to school. 33 seconds is closer to 60 seconds than 0 seconds.

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 18 at 5:57 p.m.

Thread: Norris out just having fun

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>sens65</b></div><div>It's funny how we have the exact same thing because Tkachuk and Norris are best friends.</div></div>

Who else you want? Anybody but Bedard and we'll take both Norris and Brady.

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 18 at 5:51 p.m.

Thread: Twitter Trade

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Jco5ta5</b></div><div>Yeah I agree I think this is an easier no than if you exchanged Bedard with another elite but not quite generational player as I said in my post. Hockey more so than football and basketball is much more of a team sport. For as good as Bedard is, he doesn't even play 1/3 of the game. Football, we've seen what Tom Brady, Peyton Manning, and Patrick Mahomes can do. Basketball we see what guys like Lebron James can do. They can literally change games and seasons. Bedard is obviously special and can in fact change games but hockey you need more of a team. McDavid is best player in the world and hasn't even gone to the finals. Ovechkin has only won a single Stanley Cup. So for me, I'm building a team, not just playing my best player. And if you're going to offer me 2 all-star level players for 1, I'm thinking about it.</div></div>

He is averaging 19:33. If you round, that's 1/3 of the game.

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 5 at 11:26 a.m.

Thread: Rangers Trade

Hawks wouldnt retain on Jones for that long. That kills the deal alone. Plus, id rather have a slightly overpaid Seth Jones than eating 4m for 7 years and a retention slot.

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 5 at 11:22 a.m.

Thread: dnvr

Hawks decline

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 5 at 11:21 a.m.

Thread: Keep building

Vlasic gets more term/money- Likely both. McLeod is a good player, would love to have him, but dumping Campbell cost more than that. Hawks arent trying Boquist again, that experiment failed (mostly coaching).

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 5 at 10:20 a.m.

Thread: May thy knife chip and shatter

I think the Hawks would ask more for Donato retained. Seems like an overpay to Anaheim, but maybe that's what it takes. In this market, ANA could flip Liljegren for a 2nd+.

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 4 at 9:57 a.m.

Thread: Obvious Trade Pieces for the Rebuild

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BrodeurBro30</b></div><div>I thought of Blackwell, but I didn’t know where exactly to send him. Probably a fringe playoff contender for a 5th makes sense. I think this is the first year where Chicago isn’t going to send off potential core pieces for more futures. Imo, I think they keep Raddysh and they will need to trade one of the LHD (anyone not named Korchinski) to clear a logjam.</div></div>

Problem is Raddysh's value has completely eroded. He's worth nothing now. And we will need bodies to roster next year so I'd guess they see if he can turn it around next year.

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 8 at 12:16 p.m.

Thread: Whoa Whoa

I hope in the FUTURE you'll CONSIDERATION adding picks for that Forsberg cap dump. Hawks have no need or space for a goalie, so not only will they not take him for free, but it will cost a premium for him to land in Chicago (again).

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 8 at 11:56 a.m.

Thread: 24-25 After TBL deadline

You gotta pay more than that to move Sheary to the hawks at least. They have no use, so it would be a pure dump from their point of view.

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 2 at 12:31 p.m.

Thread: Trading Crosby

Crosby and Bedard would be the most fun way to completely ruin the rebuild. I'd enjoy the hell out of 2 years and then regret it for 15.

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 2 at 12:07 p.m.

Thread: Asset Management

Not sure the Hawks would be super interested in Timmins but I do think they'd consider Robertson and Timmins for a 2nd and 6th. Robertson's fairly quick with high compete- Seems to be the profile the Hawks are after. At 22, I'd say they would be open to discussion. Not sure they'll want to give up the 33rd OA pick in the draft though.

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 31 at 5:48 p.m.

Thread: New GM

RHD stopgap until prospects get here? If they do that it would tell me they plan on moving Murphy which I dont see happening. I doubt the hawks have any interest in giving up picks or prospects for him.

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 30 at 9:19 a.m.

Thread: Chimenko

At best, Toronto gives you a second, probably still a stretch. If they were willing to give that much up for him they would have just done it months ago. Hawks are interested in Kuzmenko but if the price is higher than a 3rd they aren't even considering it.

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 23 at 11:13 a.m.

Thread: load of poop

We've stolen Rockfords talent all year. The guys that were suppose to stay there have been up and down several times. I think a deep playoff run would be good for the young players. Send everyone you can down. As far as the trades, I think I'd rather keep some guys than get back 6th and 7ths. Plus, the retention slots used from Mrazek and Johnson are worth at least that alone. So we'd be better off keeping them and being 3rd party in a trade. I dont think thats enough to take on Campbells contract either.

12 Next

Page 1

DISPLAY SETTING

BETTING ODDS

LOCALE

ARCHIVE

CBA

CALCULATORS

FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS

TOOLS

PLAYERS

WESTERN CONFERENCE

EASTERN CONFERENCE

INTERACTIVE FEATURES

BrianCampbell

Member Since

Favourite Team

Forum Posts

Posts per Day