Jun 11, 2016
Posts per Day
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>UltramanTaro</b></div><div><i><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Tonys_Pizza</b></div><div><i>Johnny and Filip and as close to an even trade as you can do... difference is Forsberg has already signed for 6 mil. and Johnny is most likely looking for more, so why would Nashville want that. Josi is a top 10 dman in the league without a doubt that is only getting paid 4 mil. Brodie, same age as Josi, generally same size, both left shots, but Brodie doesn't even crack the top 20 dmen in the league and is getting paid more then Josi. Poirier is a great prospect but Nashville likes Arvidsson quite a bit and Jarnkrok just signed the cheapest long term deal of the decade so unless something unusual happens I think it is safe to say he is untouchable. Lets not forget that you also think that the preds need to toss in a first round draft pick... for what? where does that help balance anything? I award you no stars and may god have mercy on your soul.</i></div></div> Lol Brodie doesn't crack top 20 because he's not flashy, and if you're using the NHl rankings, they put Gostisbehere and Seabrook in the top 20 even though they do not belong there whatsoever. Brodie is significantly better than Josi, only had one injury earlier this year (Josi has 5 concussions in his career already), has some of the best relative corsi stats in the league, despite facing harder competition, more defensive zone starts, and a bad system. Brodie also produces more on the even strength, his only weakness is scoring goals and power play. I guarantee if Brodie was offered for Josi and something else, Poile would take it without thinking.[/quote. I THINK YOU LOSE BASED ON TOO MANY MOVING PARTS! Simplify the trades you make bro, noone's going on a nerd quest with you to ultimate enlightenment. Give them the short and sweet of your conclusions and they will praise you.</i></div></div> <div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BreKel</b></div><div><i><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BruinsForTheWin</b></div><div><i><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BreKel</b></div><div><i><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BruinsForTheWin</b></div><div><i>Brekel I think you are the only one who believes in Bostons management. They took a Stanley Cup Winning + runner up team and made it miss the playoffs without HAVING to lose any of the core. Get a clue man.</i></div></div>
I'm just the only one who knows what they're talking about.</i></div></div> It's more like you have no clue. A new GM has around 3 years to prove his worth. Our GM did no better than the previous GM in year one. His gains / losses are about equal this year. We should finish just outside the playoffs again. If we suck again this year he's gone. You can't be given 4 top 100 F's ( Bergy Marchy Krejci Lucic) and 3 top 80 D's ( Chara Seids Krug) plus a top 10 type goalie in Rask and then miss the playoffs. We aren't getting better under dum dum Don and I know you're probably hard for him since he must have played during your prime, but you are grossly impaired if you think either you or he has a freakin clue.</i></div></div>
They should hire you. You're obviously an intelligent hockey mind who would know how to get the Bruins back on track.
But anyway, I'm 22 years old so Sweeney was at the end of his career by the time I started to follow hockey. I just laugh at the majority of moronic Bruins fans who rant about his moves like they think they have a clue. Sweeney (the correct spelling of his name. I know, it's too hard for a dumb dumb like yourself to comprehend how to actually spell someone's name...Especially when you try and **** on him constantly) has not been perfect, but no GM is. I liked the Hamilton/Lucic trades. The Martin Jones trade as well (I bet you're one of those idiots who blames him for not keeping MJ and trading Rask. It wouldn't shock me). The Beleskey and Backes signings were solid. He rebuilt our brutal prospect pool in 2 years, and we know have a good crop of legit defensive prospects that will be making an impact in 2-3 years. Rinaldo deal? Sucked. Hayes trade? Sucked.... But everyone wanted Reilly Smith gone. It's just the hindsight 20/20 crowd complaining about it. I won't get on him for not moving Eriksson at the TD b/c they were in it. You don't sell when you're in it. They've missed the playoffs by 1 point the last two years. They're closer to a playoff contender than a bottom dweller.I understand that retooling a team takes more than a few months. I'm not a goof Bruins fan with 10 brain cells who has the "I want it now," mentality.
The majority of you are just morons, to be perfectly blunt. Also, You do realize that most of your posts make you look like a total dumbass, right? Maybe it's the troll in you. I hope so...I hope you're not actually like this in everyday life.</i></div></div> You are so impaired. Beleskey wasn't a good signing you dipshit, he did nothing here and Perron and McGinn looked like all stars for the Ducks. You are an inferior hockey mind. If you are 22 and just got done playing college or a lesser pro level then step up! Fact is you're some nerd who played about High School level and has a superiority complex. Get on my level before you post against me again.... Kissing Sweeney's ass doesn't move you up either.