Avatar

CM_Insane

Avid Nucks fan
Member Since
Jun. 2, 2022
Favourite Team
Vancouver Canucks
2nd Favourite Team
Edmonton Oilers
Forum Posts
225
Posts per Day
0.6
Forum: Armchair-GMMay 27 at 9:41 p.m.
Thread: Hawks 23-24
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>rktkt66</b></div><div>Judging by the Vancouver reports, it seems the Canucks will first try to offload Myers and OEL; if they can't shed either contract, Boeser is supposedly the next target because of his cap hit, whether they like him or not.</div></div>

Boeser is probably 4th on the list but probably the most asked about as out of everyone he has the highest ceiling. List of Vancouver players that would like to shed imo is:
Myers (he really shouldn't be moved til after his signing bonus as cost to get out from him then should be less)
OEL (Probably going to cost too much too unload plus NMC is probably going to throw a wrench into trading him)
Garland (should be one of the easier to move and there should be some teams interested)
Boeser (been talked about before)
Beauvillier (1 year deal so if necessary should be more willing to retain on him but showed well when he was outside of the Islanders system)
Miller (Has value but can't be replaced and probably wouldn't get the return that would be ideally asked for him) But could be a draft day suprise
Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 19 at 7:43 p.m.
Thread: Ice Cats Doing Some Thumping NUFD 6969
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>palhal</b></div><div>Bob isn't waiving to the Canucks.</div></div>

I disagree with this as We are becoming the Russia west vs Washington's Russia East. The Goalie coach was his coach for the best years of his career (Ian Clark). But yeah without Florida eating probably at least 25%+ of his salary or paying us exteremly well for taking it (even with moving OEL the other way and if things work out right OEL will be more useful to Vancouver then Bobrovsky) I don't see it happening Vancouver even with moving Myers and Garland out are still probably too close to the cap to afford what they need (good 3C, 2 Top 4 D's (one RHD and one LHD) and a backup goalie that could at least spell Demko in case of injury or slow start again as management needs to learn from how Martin played last year vs this year. and Silovs might end up getting his confidence destroyed and not becoming the best prospect he could be.
Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 16 at 8:29 p.m.
Thread: GMBM
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Epic_Ninja_Dude</b></div><div>I think they will probably end up holding on to him. He’s bounced back under Tocchet (4 G, 11 A, 15 PTS in 20 GP), who is a coach he has also had success under in Arizona. If they do move Garland, it will be for picks, but certainly more than two 3rds. Only scenario I could see them doing this is if they go out and make a big splash in FA and have to move Garland like CBJ did with Bjorkstrand to be cap compliant.</div></div>

Well if they want to complete the revamping of the team either Boeser or Garland (and Myers) need to go. I like Garland but imo Boeser is the better player. And Garland should be moved for best pick/ pick compilation. That way we can get good 3rd line C to play between Podz and Kravstov. Hoglander can replace Garland as the skilled player on Joshua and Aman's wing.