DISPLAY SETTING
Toggle Dark Mode
Automatic Theme
BETTING ODDS
Odds Enabled
LOCALE
FR
LOGIN
REGISTER
FORUMS
ARCHIVE ▾
ARCHIVE
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
CBA ▾
CBA
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
LTIR FAQ
Buyout FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ODDS
SCOUTING
CALCULATORS ▾
CALCULATORS
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
Injury History
TOOLS ▾
TOOLS
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Team Affiliates
Professional Tryouts
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
PLAYERS ▾
PLAYERS
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
TEAMS ▾
WESTERN CONFERENCE
PACIFIC
Anaheim Ducks
Calgary Flames
Edmonton Oilers
Los Angeles Kings
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
CENTRAL
Arizona Coyotes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Dallas Stars
Minnesota Wild
Nashville Predators
St. Louis Blues
Winnipeg Jets
EASTERN CONFERENCE
METROPOLITAN
Carolina Hurricanes
Columbus Blue Jackets
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
Washington Capitals
ATLANTIC
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Detroit Red Wings
Florida Panthers
Montreal Canadiens
Ottawa Senators
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
INTERACTIVE ▾
INTERACTIVE FEATURES
Armchair-GM (Custom Roster Simulator)
Mock Draft (Entry Draft Simulator)
Trade Machine (Trade Proposal Simulator)
SEARCH
ARMCHAIR-GM
MOCK-DRAFT
TRADE MACHINE
TEAMS ▾
Anaheim Ducks
Arizona Coyotes
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Calgary Flames
Carolina Hurricanes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Columbus Blue Jackets
Dallas Stars
Detroit Red Wings
Edmonton Oilers
Florida Panthers
Los Angeles Kings
Minnesota Wild
Montreal Canadiens
Nashville Predators
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Ottawa Senators
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
St. Louis Blues
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
Washington Capitals
Winnipeg Jets
PLAYERS ▾
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
TOOLS ▾
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Professional Tryouts
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
Team Affiliates
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
CALCULATORS ▾
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
SCOUTING REPORTS
ODDS
CBA▾
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
Buyout FAQ
LTIR FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ARCHIVE ▾
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
FORUMS
LOGIN
REGISTER
FR
Toggle Dark Mode
Odds Enabled
CakeEaterBanks
Member Since
Feb. 20, 2022
Favourite Team
Toronto Maple Leafs
Forum Posts
1372
Posts per Day
1.7
POSTS
THREADS
LIKES
ARMCHAIR-GM TEAMS
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 5 at 3:49 p.m.
Thread:
Parayko
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Tennisman142</b></div><div>I mean the blues don't want to move him so other teams lining up to take him doesn't change anything</div></div>
They’ve openly said they’re trying to move out salary on the back end.
No team wants krug (plus he veto any trade he’s involved in like last year), scandella and Faulk.
St. Louis isn’t in a position to give up assets
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 5 at 3:47 p.m.
Thread:
Parayko
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>AC14</b></div><div>Again, if he’s so bad and the contract is that bad, why entertain the proposal?
It’s the same thing over and over again. I get if you’re just seeing something and seeing how it works. But in general to my understanding when you publish something on here you want input/discussion.
If your stance is he’s so bad you guys wouldn’t even take him for free. And all of us are saying the Blues aren’t and can’t trade him what does that tell you?</div></div>
What did Bret burns go for?
You can’t even tell me cause that’s how little the return was. Expect the same for Parayko once he is moved
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 5 at 2:54 p.m.
Thread:
Parayko
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>AC14</b></div><div>6.5 million for what? By most calculations you aren't going to find a top pair defenseman for 6.5m in UFA. So what you've done is you've given us a boat load of risk and some cap space, probably around 9 million in cap space to find a full top pairing. And you haven't cleared the cap space that we need to clear in Krug</div></div>
He hasn’t been a top pairing dman for better part of 2 years.
If the leafs had that contract you’d be asking for a kings ransom in return to take that contract lmfaoo
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 5 at 1:59 p.m.
Thread:
Parayko
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mokumboi</b></div><div>What on Earth are you babbling about? Just for starters, teams are calling on Parayko constantly, for years on end now. More importantly, where exactly is there a scintilla of risk for the Leafs here?
But hey, we get cap space! You guys need to watch some hockey. Stat.</div></div>
No there isn’t. Only Toronto is. The other teams is the media being fed by Doug Armstrong.
Gotta read between the lines.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 5 at 1:58 p.m.
Thread:
Parayko
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>AC14</b></div><div>6.5 million for what? By most calculations you aren't going to find a top pair defenseman for 6.5m in UFA. So what you've done is you've given us a boat load of risk and some cap space, probably around 9 million in cap space to find a full top pairing. And you haven't cleared the cap space that we need to clear in Krug</div></div>
He isn’t a top pair defenceman at the moment. He was and Toronto is hoping he will be.
That’s like saying Kevin Hayes is a 2nd line centre because he had 54 points last year.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 5 at 1:39 p.m.
Thread:
Parayko
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>AC14</b></div><div>You're willing to pay a 1st and a 2nd for Ferraro yet you stuff him on the 3rd pair. You pay a 5th and a contract for parayko and stick him on the first pair.
Regardless Blues jump at that offer. Probably the best of the 50 i've seen in the last month.</div></div>
More about balancing out the pairs having a more balanced defensive group.
As well no to many team will give up a lot for Parayko especially with his contract. The most valuable asset STL gets is 6.5 million in cap space in the offseason.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 5 at 1:37 p.m.
Thread:
Parayko
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Tennisman142</b></div><div>Counteroffer. Parayko and Thomas 50% retained for Brodie and a 7th</div></div>
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>HolyJumpin81</b></div><div>Dear god</div></div>
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mokumboi</b></div><div>There seems to be some mistake. Clearly, you meant this as an offer for Krug or Leddy.</div></div>
How many teams are lining up to take Parayko contract?
Not that many. Toronto takes all the risk and you get 6.5 million in cap space in the offseason
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 21 at 1:18 a.m.
Thread:
Trades with ideal playoff lineup
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>kash</b></div><div>The CHI and COL trades seem reasonable, but I honestly think Brodie and Tanev is better than Ferraro and Tanev. I understand Brodie is having a down year but he is an integral part of defence and there would be no point in acquiring Tanev if we’re returning a top-4 DFD right back to them. I think just acquiring Tanev with retention for a 1st-rounder will be enough, maybe include Niemela if CGY doesn’t like it.</div></div>
Ferraro is stud that had bad stats due to his team.
He faces the toughest competition and has 80% D-zone stats.
You’ll his stats improve on a better team.
The reason I don’t want Brodie on the roster is that he isn’t a defender that helps the team playoff time. Name the last guy Brodie boxed out. He also has the least amount of hits on the backend.
Guys like Ferraro, Benoit, McCabe make the opponents life harder. Having more of those guys will help the leafs against teams like Boston and Florida
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 21 at 1:15 a.m.
Thread:
Trades with ideal playoff lineup
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Seiched</b></div><div>CGY not doing that trade anyway...Ferraro has term and I wouldn't say Brodie is better than Ferraro. ever</div></div>
I doubt Calgary gets a 1st.
If anything they get what Seattle got for Giordano.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 21 at 12:21 a.m.
Thread:
Next year
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Jakobie</b></div><div>no thanks, don't want Kampf, the 2.4 hit could be used somewhere else</div></div>
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>emoprettyboy</b></div><div>no matter how many times Leafs fans pretend otherwise, Kampf does not have positive value</div></div>
Then why has Staios called to ask if he’s available?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 16 at 11:26 p.m.
Thread:
Andersson
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MoxNix</b></div><div>Irrelevant. You claimed and I quote "the highest paid players are all centers" and as my list proves that's simply not true only 1/3 of them are centers that's not even close to all of them.
Yes context is important and you're wrong once again. The majority are not centers. A majority is more than 50%, 1/3 is not 50% and if you continue down you'll find the ratios remain pretty close.</div></div>
9/20 of the top 20 highest paid player next season are centres.
That’s almost 50 percent of a sports that has 6 positions…
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 16 at 11:06 p.m.
Thread:
Andersson
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MoxNix</b></div><div>No the highest paid players aren't all centers. Just in the top 10 salaries (which is 12 players) only 4 of them are, that's 1/3rd, the other 2/3rds are mostly wingers with 2 defensemen and 1 goalie.
1. Nathan MacKinnon C $12,600,000
2. Connor McDavid C $12,500,000
3. Artemi Panarin LW $11,642,857
4. Auston Matthews C $11,640,250
5. Erik Karlsson D $11,500,000
6. David Pastrnak RW $11,250,000
7. John Tavares C $11,000,000
Drew Doughty D $11,000,000
9. Mitchell Marner RW $10,903,000
10. Jonathan Huberdeau $10,500,000
Carey Price G $10,500,000
That small sample alone has 2 defensemen who get paid more than all but 4 centers in the entire league, including 28 1st line centers. In fact Karlsson gets paid more than all but 3 centers.
Mind you most of the players on that list are overpaid, many of them by several million/year.</div></div>
2 of those players were the best dman of their generation.
Drew Doughty made a stacked Olympic team at 20 yrs old and Karlsson has multiple Norris in his name and carried Ottawa on one leg to ECF.
Context is extremely important and furthermore if you continue down again majority will be centres.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 16 at 6:24 p.m.
Thread:
Andersson
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>boltsfan71</b></div><div>ok so was Matthews, tavares and o Reilly not good centre depth</div></div>
You’re missing the point…
Also O’Rielly and Horvat went for man than any other dman, that year.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 16 at 6:17 p.m.
Thread:
Andersson
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>boltsfan71</b></div><div>not a take its a fact lol</div></div>
Why has there only been 6 dman drafted 1st overall?
Centre is the most prominent 1st overall selection due to its value.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 16 at 6:16 p.m.
Thread:
Andersson
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>JaredOfLondon</b></div><div>Oh wow, benoit turned out to be a bottom pairing defender! I mean, at least i wasnt like thos3 weirdos who thought he was a legit top 4 guy.
You also thought treliving was a genius for signing reaves, so maybe you should simmer your hindsight attempts.
Lol, peeke</div></div>
When did I say that.
He’s not a top pairing guy but he’s the kind of defender that’s needed in deep playoff runs.
Guys like Brodie get bullied in the playoffs. Benoit does the bullying.
Also if you think the leafs haven’t played with more physicality this season it because of guys like Reaves in the locker room.
His contract is dreadful but he does bring value to this team and his contract can be buried in the AHL next season
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 16 at 6:13 p.m.
Thread:
Andersson
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>boltsfan71</b></div><div>not in the playoffs they're not more valuable</div></div>
Man that is a dreadful take.
Any GM in the league would take a 1st line centre over a top pairing dman.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 16 at 6:10 p.m.
Thread:
Andersson
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>boltsfan71</b></div><div>not when they have similar contracts and are being acquired for playoffs</div></div>
Ok now let’s compare.
Which is more valuable, a 1st line centre or top pairing dman.
Answer a 1st line centre.
So why would I pay the same for a top pairing dman.
Even the highest paid players are all centres because it’s more valuable.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 16 at 6:08 p.m.
Thread:
Andersson
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>JaredOfLondon</b></div><div>Lol, you think peeke is good</div></div>
You talked a lot of crap about Benoit and how tree should be fired for that signing and now he’s one of best defensive dman on our roster and heart and soul guy.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 16 at 6:07 p.m.
Thread:
Andersson
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>boltsfan71</b></div><div>other Lindholm</div></div>
Two completely different positions.
Can’t compare a trade for a centre with a trade for a defenceman.
Centres are far more valuable.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 16 at 6:05 p.m.
Thread:
Andersson
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>JaredOfLondon</b></div><div>I do like how you under paid for andersson and then still traded value for peeke for some reason and he wouldn't even crack the current leafs roster</div></div>
You get bullied on twitter.
Your option is quite irrelevant
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 16 at 6:04 p.m.
Thread:
Andersson
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>boltsfan71</b></div><div>its gonna be close to Lindholm</div></div>
Not without an extension.
What made Boston comfortable giving up that package for Lindholm was extension they had in place.
No team is giving that up. Orlov went for 1st, 2nd and 3rd with 75% retention.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 16 at 6:00 p.m.
Thread:
Andersson
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>boltsfan71</b></div><div>those teams will still prob overpay either way thats not enough for Andersson</div></div>
I would put money they’ll get far less. If he comes with an extension he’ll get Hampus Lindholm like deal.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 16 at 5:59 p.m.
Thread:
Andersson
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Totorou555</b></div><div>I’m an oilers fan but I know that the flames reject the anderson trade by a mile. He’s really good cheap and sign two more years. Deal start with knies++</div></div>
Highly unlikely. If they trade Anderson they’ll want back dman prospects.
I don’t think they have a single dman prospect that has top 4 potential in their system at the moment. Correct me if I’m wrong Calgary fans.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 16 at 5:57 p.m.
Thread:
Andersson
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MoSeider53</b></div><div>:laugh The only thing invalid is your pathetic offer for Rasmus Andersson.</div></div>
😂😂😂 just like Stevie Y on July 1st
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 16 at 5:57 p.m.
Thread:
Andersson
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>boltsfan71</b></div><div>theres gonna be a bidding war for Hanifin he'll fetch something like that</div></div>
But there’s a few teams he’ll accept a trade to.
That a small budding group.
1
2
Next
Page 1
SalarySwish
| NBA Salary Caps by CapFriendly
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Forum Rules
About
CBA FAQ
Contact Us
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com