SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

Can_Fan

Member Since
Sep. 13, 2020
Favourite Team
Montreal Canadiens
2nd Favourite Team
Calgary Flames
Forum Posts
105
Posts per Day
0.1
Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 22, 2023 at 9:50 a.m.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ricochetii</b></div><div>I said we <strong>may</strong> need to move Matheson because we will have 5 LHD if we don't move Edmundson.
Development is the priority and we need to ensure other players are getting sufficient minutes.
His value may also be at a high and/or enable us to pick up a RHD.
If he were a couple years younger and had a couple years more term, absolutely keep him and move one of the younger guys instead. As it stands we aren't in a position to capitalize on his performance before his contract expires.

If he plays the other side as a stop-gap measure, that's a little better but again a temporary measure we aren't in position to take advantage of. There is at least the benefit of giving us 3 years to fully develop our left side and work on an eventually replacement in that scenario.
On the left either him or Edmundson has to go. Combined they simply take too many minutes.</div></div>

All ture but of course you just trade edmundson instead.... and i mnot that worried about Rd as many players are comfortable on that side like Harris... i think Barron will be good and I do like Savard if mailloux doesnt develop then you can re-sign savard for 2 more seasons... So we shouldnt do a knee jerk trade and move matheson,,,, he could be better than all the prospects coming... Also Lane hutson plays the right side as well.

Matheson Barron
Guhle Savard
Xjerex Harris
Should be the pairs next year.

However next year is the year of the rookies forward and drafting a good goalie of the future.
Forum: Armchair-GMSep. 5, 2021 at 8:33 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 30, 2021 at 9:47 p.m.