SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

Cham

Member Since
Mar. 7, 2017
Favourite Team
Calgary Flames
2nd Favourite Team
Chicago Blackhawks
Forum Posts
130
Posts per Day
0.1
Forum: NHL TradesFeb. 23, 2022 at 10:45 a.m.
Thread: (CHI / CBJ) - Saad, Forsberg for Panarin, Motte
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>phillyjabroni</b></div><div>Great trade for CHI</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Daoloth</b></div><div>I really like this trade for Chicago getting a potential starting goalie in Anton Forsberg who I had wanted Vegas to take/etc ;). Saad is under contract longer so they probably would have had a harder time signing Pan after he was done with current deal. So this might end up saving them more in the long run while giving them what could be a real deal number 1 goalie too :). Saad was always good on Chicago, pretty bold move, guess the Hossa situation along with losing Darling was major factor in it. Shocking in a way that they would trade him, though I think the return will pan out pretty well for Chicago long and short term :).</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mtdavis311</b></div><div>Panarin being coached by Torts is a disaster waiting to happen. He was already moving Saad down the lineup because he didn't like his two way or his physical play... Let's see how he reacts to Panarin's game.</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Hockeyplayer1</b></div><div>This trade makes absolute sense for the Hawks. Panarin is a one dimensional player. A DAMN good one but still one dimensional.
Saad brings the all around game (two-way, PP, PK) and has been proven to play great next to Toews and make Toews better as well. Saad has 4 years left on his deal while Panarin is a UFA in 2 which the Hawks likely cant afford after. Saad fits better into the Hawks system and is a year younger.

Not a fan of giving up Motte but the Hawks need goalies.

There is a lot more to a forward than just points.

I dislike the Hammer trade though. Don't agree with that one at all.</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Sahil2020</b></div><div>Panarin is a 60-65 point player, playing with Kane gives a slight bump, and saad is a 50-55 point player that might be 60 pointer with kane, panarin is better but Chicago still won the deal</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Cham</b></div><div>On paper Columbus won this trade in terms of the regular season, off paper Chicago b*tch slapped Columbus. In three years with Saad him and Toews won the Stanley cup twice, in two years with Panarin him and Kane dominated the regular season but couldn't finish. Also from last season we know that Panarin can't play well without Kane, or at least someone with his skill set, while Saad can definitely play with Toews and others. Also Saad is a year younger than Panarin, has a longer contract, and plays more physical. Panarin is older than Saad, has a contract that expires in two years and after that he'll definitely want more than 6 mil, and he isn't physical at all. Also Panarin won't fit with Torts, just like Saad didn't. Saad fits with Q, just like Panarin did. Also Motte looked like a bust in the games he played in the NHL last season and still underwhelmed in the AHL where Forsberg looked great in the AHL but also underperformed in the NHL in the few games he played (Darling also started out slow). Also Chicago gets a better pick in a better draft.</div></div>

Hahahaha sorry I couldn’t help myself.
Forum: NHL TradesJul. 28, 2021 at 11:52 a.m.
Forum: NHL TradesJul. 28, 2021 at 11:02 a.m.
Forum: NHL TradesJul. 28, 2021 at 11:02 a.m.